-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
new Table B descriptor for "Satellite sub-identifier" #118
Comments
@jbathegit thanks for taking the time to discuss this with me. As we noted, there may also be the possibility to use the Issue Number of the WIGOS station ID for this purpose. We are discussing this in the framework of the CGMS Task Group on Satellite Data and Codes, and also in TT-WSI. |
presented at https://github.com/wmo-im/CCT/wiki/Teleconference-18-and-19.5.2022
|
The branch has been updated. |
@jbathegit thank you. |
Summary and purpose
This issue proposes a new Table B descriptor for "Satellite sub-identifier"
Stakeholders
This would be of interest and potential use by any commercial or non-commercial providers of satellite data, as an additional way to define and classify the data within their BUFR reports.
As already discussed with @SimonElliottEUM, this would also be of interest to the CGMS, who may in turn want to consider the use of this new value within WIGOS Station Identifiers (WSIs) for satellite reports.
Discussion
One of the commercial providers for satellite radio occultation has requested a new "Satellite sub-identifier" descriptor in BUFR. As envisioned, this would have a numerical value between 1 and 65534 (i.e. 16 bits wide) and which any satellite data provider (commercial or non-commercial) could then use to differentiate between multiple satellites under a single "Satellite identifier" value from the 0-01-007 table. So you could basically define up to 65534 subentries for each corresponding 0-01-007 entry, and at least for the commercial RO data this would allow a better way for each vendor to categorize reports from among all of the different nanosatellites within their own constellations. It would be up to each vendor to internally keep track of which number corresponded to which individual satellite in their constellation, but this would be a preferable way to be able to backtrack vs. the current situation where each vendor has a combination of a small number of 0-01-007 and 0-02-019 entries for this same purpose.
We could do this without impacting the BUFR Table D sequence 3-10-026 which is currently used to report RO data, because any vendors who wanted to report this additional information could do so by simply adding this new descriptor to their BUFR messages immediately preceding the main 3-10-026 descriptor, which itself would remain unchanged. Again, I'm thinking this new descriptor would be completely optional, but potentially useful supplementary information if anyone wanted to use it, including for other types of satellite reports besides just RO data.
Detailed proposal
Add new descriptor to Class 1 of BUFR Table B:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: