SPM ADM0

[leeberryman]

Thanks @alex-imb!

SPM ADM0 This is digitized from Sentinel2 imagery.

Why do we need this boundary?

#2961

Anything Unusual?

[DanRunfola]

Thanks Lee! Going to have our Data Engineer work on this - may have to redo the PR so it kicks off our bot (not quite sure why it didn't in this case, so going to check).

[rohith4444]

Hello @leeberryman,

No files have been altered in the commit. We're uncertain how this pull request was generated without any file modifications.

[leeberryman]

@rohith4444 I took a branch on @alex-imb's fork and pulled it into my branch on geoboundaries SPM ADM0 and created a pull request from this branch to main. Can you see the additional files?

[DanRunfola]

@leeberryman looks like the files themselves aren't being included in some step here - i.e., the diff itself is "0", indicating that no changes are present from this commit vs. the gB main. My guess is this has somethign to do with our use of LFS, and how that might interact with a fork that doesn't have LFS installed?

I added @alex-imb to the collaborators list, so I think they'll be able to commit direclty now.

[leeberryman]

Thanks @DanRunfola, @alex-imb will go ahead and make a new commit.

[github-actions]

Hello! I am the geoBoundary Bot, and I just did an initial check on your submitted files.

I will automatically re-run my checks when you edit your Pull Request, and provide the new results in a comment just like this.
Once all of your files meet my programmed standards, I will flag your file for a manual human review.
=========== Submission Findings ===========

Full logs for geometryDataChecks

OVERALL STATUS: 2 checks are failing. I have some recommendations for you on how you might fix these.

fileChecks: You submitted at least one file that is missing a meta.txt, which is required. Please make sure your meta.txt is in the root of your submitted zip file - I have not yet been programmed to look in folders for your meta.txt.
Full logs for fileChecks

geometryDataChecks: All checks PASSED. Nothing that needs to be done here right now.
Full logs for geometryDataChecks

metaChecks: It looks like your metadata has one or more errors - take a look at the logs to see what you need to fix.
Full logs for metaChecks

----- Preview -----

[github-actions]

Hello! I am the geoBoundary Bot, and I just did an initial check on your submitted files.

I will automatically re-run my checks when you edit your Pull Request, and provide the new results in a comment just like this.
Once all of your files meet my programmed standards, I will flag your file for a manual human review.
=========== Submission Findings ===========

Full logs for fileChecks

Full logs for geometryDataChecks

Full logs for metaChecks

All checks have passed! I'll flag your boundary submission for a manual review by one of my humans.

[jingjli1]

Looks good!

[jingjli1]

looks good

[github-actions]

Hello! I am the geoBoundary Bot, and I just did an initial check on your submitted files.

I will automatically re-run my checks when you edit your Pull Request, and provide the new results in a comment just like this.
Once all of your files meet my programmed standards, I will flag your file for a manual human review.
=========== Submission Findings ===========

Full logs for fileChecks

Full logs for geometryDataChecks

Full logs for metaChecks

All checks have passed! I'll flag your boundary submission for a manual review by one of my humans.

[github-actions]

Hello! I am the geoBoundary Bot, and I just did an initial check on your submitted files.

I will automatically re-run my checks when you edit your Pull Request, and provide the new results in a comment just like this.
Once all of your files meet my programmed standards, I will flag your file for a manual human review.
=========== Submission Findings ===========

Full logs for fileChecks

Full logs for geometryDataChecks

Full logs for metaChecks

All checks have passed! I'll flag your boundary submission for a manual review by one of my humans.