i18n(de): update astro-syntax.mdx

[trueberryless]

Description (required)

• update astro-syntax.mdx
• Redistribute Built-in components and remove page #9888

Related issues & labels (optional)

• Closes #
• Suggested label:

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for astro-docs-2 ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	8ed6b4e
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/astro-docs-2/deploys/6730904ac7c2c8000829290a
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-9942--astro-docs-2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[astrobot-houston]

Lunaria Status Overview

🌕 This pull request will trigger status changes.

Learn more

By default, every PR changing files present in the Lunaria configuration's files property will be considered and trigger status changes accordingly.

You can change this by adding one of the keywords present in the ignoreKeywords property in your Lunaria configuration file in the PR's title (ignoring all files) or by including a tracker directive in the merged commit's description.

Tracked Files

Locale	File	Note
de	basics/astro-syntax.mdx	Localization changed, will be marked as complete.

Warnings reference

Icon	Description
🔄️	The source for this localization has been updated since the creation of this pull request, make sure all changes in the source have been applied.

[jsparkdev]

I found a few things that were wrong.

{item} and visiable are words that don't exist, but want to highlight them. This causes the highlighting to not render. (lines 80, 93)

[jsparkdev]

In the original English, client:* hydration directives is set as a link, but here, only client:* is set as a link.

This seems wrong to me, but I could be wrong, as different countries have different language usage.

If this is what you intended, please let me know!

[jsparkdev]

Other than the parts mentioned above, everything else seems to be perfect!

[trueberryless]

Thank you so much for not only looking at the new content, but the whole page! Otherwise, I would never have found those mistakes!

You are right with the client: * link, the other word was not highlighted...

[jsparkdev]

LGTM!

[trueberryless]

Another cool tip, now that you're one of the maintainers:

You probably have seen many reviews from other people with over 1000 commits in 3 withastro repos, but I don't know if you know how to create a review. Follow this nice guide: 😉

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/reviewing-proposed-changes-in-a-pull-request#starting-a-review

I'm just mentioning this because you posted the review as normal comments, so maybe I can help... 😊

[trueberryless]

Follow this nice guide: 😉

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/reviewing-proposed-changes-in-a-pull-request#starting-a-review

One important point, I always miss when starting a review myself: Click the "Start a review" button (Step 10 in the GitHub guide). It's usually green and somewhere at the bottom right of the "files changed" page. 😉

[jsparkdev]

@trueberryless Thanks!

By the way, it looks like I can only add reviews to modified code in PR, so I added this review as a general comment!

I often forget to hit the green button to complete a review, haha.

[trueberryless]

By the way, it looks like I can only add reviews to modified code in PR, so I added this review as a general comment!

Oh yeah, I didn't think about this... Sorry 😔
What HiDeoo does in this situation though, is just to add the comment at the last possible line and mention something like "can't add comment there cause out of review range"

[jsparkdev]

Thanks for the tip, I'll try it next time :)