chore: Remove self user creator [WPB-11559]

[m-zagorski]

WPB-11559 [Android] Delete a group as admin

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-11559

What's new in this PR?

Issues

We dont need the selfUserCreator anymore as the constraints on deleting group have changes, and now we need to belong to the same team.

Merge after

Merge only after this is merged wireapp/wire-android#3652

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 329 tests   - 1   3 222 ✅  - 1   5m 1s ⏱️ -12s
  571 suites ±0     107 💤 ±0 
  571 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 4520416. ± Comparison against base commit a02f920.

This pull request removes 1 test.

com.wire.kalium.persistence.dao.ConversationDAOTest ‑ givenSelfUserIsCreatorOfConversation_whenGettingConversationDetails_itReturnsCorrectDetails[jvm]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	chore/remove-self-user-creator
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	nanoseconds (ns)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	656,355.36
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	380,253,395.93
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,322,181,975.39
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	21,303,153.86

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.21%. Comparing base (a02f920) to head (4520416).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3118      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    54.21%   54.21%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1250     1250              
  Lines        36328    36323       -5     
  Branches      3658     3657       -1     
===========================================
- Hits         19697    19693       -4     
  Misses       15218    15218              
+ Partials      1413     1412       -1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ire/kalium/logic/data/conversation/Conversation.kt	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...lium/logic/data/conversation/ConversationMapper.kt	58.15% <ø> (+0.12%)	⬆️
...onversation/ConversationDetailsWithEventsMapper.kt	92.55% <ø> (-0.08%)	⬇️
...persistence/dao/conversation/ConversationMapper.kt	97.87% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
...istence/dao/conversation/ConversationViewEntity.kt	97.87% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a02f920...4520416. Read the comment docs.

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: chore/remove-self-user-creator
Commit report: a69f9a4
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3222 Passed, 107 Skipped, 35.96s Total Time

[MohamadJaara]

please also remove it from the view where it is created

[m-zagorski]

please also remove it from the view where it is created

should I also remove it from db?

[MohamadJaara]

please also remove it from the view where it is created

should I also remove it from db?

if it is not used anywhere else then yes

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud