Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use mixins in IDL definitions #3187

Closed
TimothyGu opened this issue Nov 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Use mixins in IDL definitions #3187

TimothyGu opened this issue Nov 2, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@TimothyGu
Copy link
Member

TimothyGu commented Nov 2, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Mixins have been added to Web IDL to replace the [NoInterfaceObject] extended attribute + implements statement.

See whatwg/webidl#433.

/cc @tobie
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres mentioned this issue Nov 2, 2017
Closed
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Nov 3, 2017

I think we also need to block this on tooling as the HTML Standard is scraped for IDL. If that tool can no longer recognize our IDL all kinds of cross-references might go dead.

@tobie
Copy link
Contributor

tobie commented Nov 3, 2017

Here again, it would help if this was closed as dup of #3194 (as the latter's tracked in whatwg/webidl#472). Here again, I apologize for the noise.

@domenic domenic mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2017
Closed
33 tasks
@domenic domenic closed this as completed Nov 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@tobie @domenic @TimothyGu @annevk