[bug] at is ignored

[lmartelli]

Just a test case to show the bug.

[ashleyfrieze]

I'll look at this one. Thanks for raising it @lmartelli

[ashleyfrieze]

I can explain this one. It's sort of user-error, but it's sort of not.

When we use objectContains we're essentially relaxing the rules. We're telling the asserter to ignore any field not present in the expected.

The following version of your test does what your assertion is trying to do:

assertThatThrownBy(() ->
        assertJson("{foo: 42}")
                .where().objectContains()
                .at("/foo").isText()
                .isEqualTo("{foo:42}"))
        .isInstanceOf(AssertionFailedError.class);