-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improving transmatrix and related functions #26
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
- npm packages upgrade
- npm packages upgrade
- bunch of debug logs - removing enableBlur bool variable because not necessary anymore (commit files previously missed)
I'm trying to improve the note: if you want to try, you can see the num. of keypoints in the console with other infos. |
I have little test in the chrome performance console and it seems that the
|
- set NONE_BLUR for processFrame
I have uploaded a new example
|
Improving transmatrix and related functions and other improves
This PR try to improve the transmattrix and related functions but also add a bunch of improves in different part of the code.
I have tested the code that use Th Grayscale class and the other: we can exclude that use a different OpenCV code base so i noted that for example with teblid example i got a maximum of feature points instead with the three.js - jsfeatNext example i got much less. I have the suspect that there is a discrepance in the video data ( and this only a js code issue) between the video data passed by the Grayscale.js and the video data (also this in Gray format) from jsfeatNext. I will try to find the reason, if i solve this issue the code will be ready to be released.