Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Github Actions #6100

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
May 19, 2023
Merged

Improve Github Actions #6100

merged 42 commits into from
May 19, 2023

Conversation

avkos
Copy link
Contributor

@avkos avkos commented May 16, 2023

Description

  • All tests depend on the build. To decrease build time I've moved ESM and Types builds to a separate process
  • Fix lint test to auto create .secret file if it doesn't not exists
  • Replace the 14 to 18 Node version.

Please include a summary of the changes and be sure to follow our Contribution Guidelines.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • I have selected the correct base branch.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules.
  • I ran npm run lint with success and extended the tests and types if necessary.
  • I ran npm run test:unit with success.
  • I ran npm run test:coverage and my test cases cover all the lines and branches of the added code.
  • I ran npm run build and tested dist/web3.min.js in a browser.
  • I have tested my code on the live network.
  • I have checked the Deploy Preview and it looks correct.
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md file in the root folder.
  • I have linked Issue(s) with this PR in "Linked Issues" menu.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 16, 2023

Bundle Stats

Hey there, this message comes from a github action that helps you and reviewers to understand how these changes affect the size of this project's bundle.

As this PR is updated, I'll keep you updated on how the bundle size is impacted.

Total

Asset Old size New size Diff Diff %
Total 643 KB 643 KB 710 bytes 0.11%
View detailed bundle breakdown

Added

No assets were added

Removed

No assets were removed

Bigger

No assets were bigger

Smaller

No assets were smaller

Unchanged

Asset Old size New size Diff Diff %
web3.min.js 626 KB 627 KB 710 bytes 0.11%
../lib/commonjs/index.d.ts 8.43 KB 8.43 KB 0 0.00%
../lib/commonjs/accounts.d.ts 3.67 KB 3.67 KB 0 0.00%
../lib/commonjs/types.d.ts 2.37 KB 2.37 KB 0 0.00%
../lib/commonjs/abi.d.ts 1000 bytes 1000 bytes 0 0.00%
../lib/commonjs/web3.d.ts 808 bytes 808 bytes 0 0.00%
../lib/commonjs/eth.exports.d.ts 280 bytes 280 bytes 0 0.00%
../lib/commonjs/providers.exports.d.ts 148 bytes 148 bytes 0 0.00%
../lib/commonjs/version.d.ts 60 bytes 60 bytes 0 0.00%

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented May 16, 2023

Deploying with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: b74138b
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://5e57ebd6.web3-js-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://improve-github-actions.web3-js-docs.pages.dev

View logs

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6100 (b74138b) into 4.x (88628bb) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              4.x    #6100   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.93%   87.93%           
=======================================
  Files         199      199           
  Lines        7570     7570           
  Branches     2053     2054    +1     
=======================================
  Hits         6657     6657           
  Misses        913      913           
Flag Coverage Δ
UnitTests 87.93% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
web3 ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-core ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-errors ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-abi ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-accounts ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-contract ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-ens ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-iban ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-eth-personal ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-net ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-providers-http ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-providers-ipc ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-providers-ws ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-rpc-methods ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-utils ∅ <ø> (∅)
web3-validator ∅ <ø> (∅)

@avkos
Copy link
Contributor Author

avkos commented May 18, 2023

Blackbox tests fixed
image
Here is a link to the tests: https://github.com/web3/web3.js/actions/runs/5018104015/jobs/8997618185

@@ -67,6 +68,8 @@ import type {
SignResult,
} from './types';

const secp256k1 = ethereumCryptography.secp256k1 ?? ethereumCryptography;

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What was the reason for needing this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in case of ESM secp256k1 was undefined

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ jobs:
build:
strategy:
matrix:
node: [14, 16]
node: [18, 16]
name: Build Packages
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
name: Build Packages
name: Build CJS

lets be consistent with other build naming and more visibility in ci ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

- run: tar -czf /tmp/web3-${{ matrix.node }}.js.tar.gz --exclude="./.git" ./
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: web3-${{ matrix.node }}.js.tar.gz
path: /tmp/web3-${{ matrix.node }}.js.tar.gz

build-cjs-types:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
build-cjs-types:
build-esm-types:

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done


build-cjs-types:
name: Build ESM & Types
needs: build
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is no need of needs: build so it should be removed? as ESM is not dependent on CJS technical

Copy link
Contributor Author

@avkos avkos May 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@avkos It should though, our code is written using modules, so the CJS build should be irrelevant. I think when can keep this as is, but should create an issue to investigate further @jdevcs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines 57 to 58
matrix:
node: [ 18 ]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

matrix should only be used when we want to run job for multiple variables, so it should be removed, as Lint is being run for one node version.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done


build-web:
name: Build Web
needs: build
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
matrix:
node: [ 18 ]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here, for matrix

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

jobs:
build:
strategy:
matrix:
node: [14]
node: [16]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here for matrix

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@jdevcs
Copy link
Contributor

jdevcs commented May 19, 2023

Thanks @avkos for fixing ESM bug, and testing on v18,
I suggested few improvements ( less priority ) as compared to other bugs like ( truffle migration bugs, tx, ..etc ) so we can do it later after full release if its time consuming.

Copy link
Contributor

@spacesailor24 spacesailor24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming we create an issue to track above esm build error, LGTM

@spacesailor24 spacesailor24 merged commit ed5a7f8 into 4.x May 19, 2023
@spacesailor24 spacesailor24 deleted the improve-github-actions branch May 19, 2023 23:15
@djrann13 djrann13 linked an issue May 20, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add repository
4 participants