-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 712
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pseudo nodes are unclickable #249
Comments
This was also my reasoning. Nothing to see there. |
Pseudo nodes in the containers view have a ton of metadata. On Tuesday, 16 June 2015, David [email protected] wrote:
|
Pseudonodes are nodes we have to invent because we have them as a destination in an edge, but don't have any other data (metadata) for them. If a node has metadata, by definition it is not a pseudonode. |
Are you suggesting uncontained should not be a pseudo node? Note that even under you definition, we still have useful info we should On Saturday, 20 June 2015, Peter Bourgon [email protected] wrote:
|
Agh, uncontained. Right. For the record, we're abusing the pseudo flag for that one. But, point taken. There's always going to be some information we can display, actually. |
Which nodes in which topologies do not have any data? I'm asking because we could show an actionable message like install a probe in the details panel in that case. |
Not much in the process topology to show. And "the internet" never has any info. Really its only the uncontained node that has meaningful info I think. OTOH paul's recent connections stuff might work for all pseudo nodes... |
Is this intentional?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: