You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
2opremio opened this issue
Dec 12, 2016
· 2 comments
Labels
bugBroken end user or developer functionality; not working as the developers intended itecsPertains to integration with Amazon Elastic Container Service
Right now (after #2026) we only "discover" ECS services through tasks (we obtain the task list from Docker labels and obtain services associated to those tasks, the process is well documented in #2065).
This means we don't obtain information nor render services without associated tasks (e.g. Services with replication factor 0, which is valid, and services whose tasks are not running).
This may or may not be a real problem for users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
2opremio
added
the
bug
Broken end user or developer functionality; not working as the developers intended it
label
Dec 12, 2016
Well, as of #2065 we only describe services that have tasks running on our machine. I like this because it means the number of calls is bounded by the number of things running per machine, whereas describing every service on every machine would be problematic in very large clusters.
Sigh. These rate limits make everything difficult.
Given the current constraints we may need to accept not supporting showing non-running services for now.
Ideally we should document that somewhere.
bugBroken end user or developer functionality; not working as the developers intended itecsPertains to integration with Amazon Elastic Container Service
Right now (after #2026) we only "discover" ECS services through tasks (we obtain the task list from Docker labels and obtain services associated to those tasks, the process is well documented in #2065).
This means we don't obtain information nor render services without associated tasks (e.g. Services with replication factor 0, which is valid, and services whose tasks are not running).
This may or may not be a real problem for users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: