Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

File Operations Documentation #2005

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025
Merged

File Operations Documentation #2005

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

oneirocosm
Copy link
Member

Add docs for

  • The various file commands (cp, mv, ls, etc.)
  • Directory preview drag and drop to copy

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the documentation in two areas. The first update adds a "Copy a File" section under the "Preview" widget in the widgets documentation. This new section explains how to copy files or directories between open directory widgets using drag and drop, including operations across different connections. The second update modifies the Wave Shell reference documentation for the file command by removing the phrase "(not yet supported)" regarding the S3 storage system, indicating that S3 is now supported for file management. It also clarifies that if no scheme is specified when addressing files, the file will be treated as a local connection. The documentation maintains the existing structure and details regarding the URI format and supported URI schemes.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f91ea1d and 19903fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/docs/wsh-reference.mdx (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/docs/wsh-reference.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: merge-gatekeeper
  • GitHub Check: Build for TestDriver.ai
  • GitHub Check: Build Docsite

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/docs/widgets.mdx (1)

65-68: Expressive Copy Guidance:
The new "Copy a File" section clearly explains how to use drag and drop between directory widgets, which is a great usability enhancement. However, at line 67, the phrasing "simply drag" might be made a bit more expressive (for example, “click and drag” or “select and drag”) to better guide users through the interaction.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~67-~67: Consider a more expressive alternative.
Context: ... a file or a directory between them. To do this, simply drag the file or directory...

(DO_ACHIEVE)

docs/docs/wsh-reference.mdx (3)

529-575: Detailed URI Documentation:
The note following the subcommand listings provides an in-depth explanation of the supported URI schemes and file systems. This level of detail is very useful. To enhance readability, consider reformatting the list (e.g., using bullet points or a table) so that users can quickly scan the formats and supported systems.


580-617: Avoid Redundancy in Command Examples:
The document now contains a second set of detailed examples for commands like cat, write, and append. While the additional examples are helpful for contextual learning, they duplicate information already provided in the earlier segments. Consider either merging these sections or clearly labeling them as “Extended Examples” to help distinguish from the initial command summaries.


619-728: Consistent Formatting for Extended Examples and Flags:
The extended examples and flag descriptions for commands (such as those for rm, info, cp, mv, and another listing for ls) are comprehensive and informative. To further improve usability, consider adopting a consistent format (for example, using bullet lists for flags and ensuring a uniform style across all subcommands). This will help users better navigate the documentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27c01cf and bce8716.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/docs/widgets.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/wsh-reference.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/docs/widgets.mdx

[style] ~67-~67: Consider a more expressive alternative.
Context: ... a file or a directory between them. To do this, simply drag the file or directory...

(DO_ACHIEVE)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: merge-gatekeeper
  • GitHub Check: Build for TestDriver.ai
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: Build Docsite
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/docs/wsh-reference.mdx (1)

463-528: Comprehensive File Command Overview:
The introduction of the file command and its subcommands (including ls, cat, info, rm, write, append, cp, and mv) is clear and well-structured. Each command is accompanied by a concise code snippet and a brief description, which should help users quickly grasp the available functionality.

The `file` command provides a set of subcommands for managing files across different storage systems, such as `wavefile`, `wsh` remote servers, and S3 (not yet supported).
The `file` command provides a set of subcommands for managing files across different storage systems, such as `wavefile`, `wsh` remote servers, and S3.

### ls
Copy link
Member

@esimkowitz esimkowitz Feb 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commands are already documented below in this file

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/docs/wsh-reference.mdx (4)

465-472: ls Subcommand Documentation
The documentation for the ls subcommand is concise and clear, showing the syntax and a brief description. To further assist users, you might consider providing an example—especially one that demonstrates available flags (like -l for long format) in a practical context.


481-488: Enhancing the info Command Details
The info subcommand clearly shows its syntax and purpose. It might be beneficial to list the expected file attributes (e.g., name, permissions, last modified time, and size) in a bullet-point format to further clarify the output provided by this command.


489-496: rm Command Functionality
The documentation for the rm command is straightforward and explains that it performs a permanent file removal. If the command supports any flags (for instance, a recursive deletion flag), it would help to mention them here or provide a reference to their usage.


505-512: Clarification for the append Command
The append command is well documented with its intended purpose and size limitation. However, a brief explanation on the behavior when appending would result in surpassing the 10MB limit could be valuable for user understanding.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bce8716 and dbef8a2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/docs/wsh-reference.mdx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Build for TestDriver.ai
  • GitHub Check: Build Docsite
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: merge-gatekeeper
🔇 Additional comments (7)
docs/docs/wsh-reference.mdx (7)

461-528: Review on Potential Redundancy in File Commands Documentation
A previous review comment (line 465) noted: "The commands are already documented below in this file." Please verify that these additions are intentional enhancements rather than duplicating existing content. If duplication is unintentional, consider consolidating the file command documentation to avoid redundancy.


463-464: Clear Introduction for the File Command
The introductory description now explains that the file command manages files across different storage systems. For added clarity, consider explicitly listing the storage systems (e.g., local, remote via WSH, S3) or linking to a section that details them.


473-480: cat Subcommand Explanation
The cat command section succinctly describes its purpose and usage. Consider adding a brief note on how the command handles very large files or non-text (binary) files, which may help set proper user expectations.


497-504: write Command Documentation Verification
The description for the write command correctly notes that it writes standard input to a file with a 10MB file size limit. Consider clarifying what users should expect if the input data exceeds 10MB (e.g., does it error out, or is the input truncated?).


513-520: cp Command Usage is Clear
The cp subcommand is documented clearly with the appropriate syntax and description. It effectively communicates its ability to copy files between various storage systems. An example that demonstrates the use of optional flags (such as recursive copy) could further enhance this section.


521-528: Comprehensive mv Command Explanation
The mv command section clearly states that the source file is deleted upon a successful move, which helps prevent misuse. To further assist users, consider emphasizing the differences compared to the cp command and documenting any related flags if available.


533-534: URI Handling Clarification
The updated note clarifying that file URIs "vary depending on the storage system" and that a missing scheme defaults to a local connection is very useful. For better user guidance, you might add a cross-reference to the more detailed URI format section further down in the document.

@oneirocosm oneirocosm merged commit 9b4ca0f into main Feb 21, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@oneirocosm oneirocosm deleted the sylvie/fileops-docs branch February 21, 2025 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants