Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing the logic for the SCDM method with guiding centres and constrained centres in SLWF #202

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2018

Conversation

VVitale
Copy link
Collaborator

@VVitale VVitale commented Oct 5, 2018

Also, some minor changes in parameters.F90 (printing more clear error messages for the SLWF method).

…ntres for SLWF. Also, some minor changes in parameters.F90 (printing more clear error messages for the SLWF method).
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #202 into develop will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 33.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #202      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    61.01%   61.01%   +<.01%     
===========================================
  Files           29       29              
  Lines        16930    16933       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits         10329    10331       +2     
- Misses        6601     6602       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/parameters.F90 80.58% <33.33%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ae7405f...d72d821. Read the comment docs.

@giovannipizzi giovannipizzi merged commit 7105413 into wannier-developers:develop Oct 5, 2018
manxkim pushed a commit to manxkim/wannier90 that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2021
Fixing the logic for the SCDM method with guiding centres and constrained centres in SLWF
Fixes wannier-developers#201
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants