Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a few stylistic issues with the new parallel code #185

Merged

Conversation

giovannipizzi
Copy link
Member

This solves #128

  • comms.F90 moved to main folder
  • removed unneeded checks from param_read

`param_read` is indeed called already inside a
`if (on_root)` so these checks were not needed.
Also added a comment at the top stating that the
function should be called only from one (root) node.
@giovannipizzi giovannipizzi requested review from jryates and VVitale June 21, 2018 11:43
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #185 into develop will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 87.5%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #185      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    57.99%   57.99%   +<.01%     
===========================================
  Files           27       27              
  Lines        16051    16052       +1     
===========================================
+ Hits          9309     9310       +1     
  Misses        6742     6742
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/comms.F90 49.55% <ø> (ø)
src/parameters.F90 77.66% <87.5%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3ee17aa...ac42671. Read the comment docs.

The current coverage is < 70% (codecov min default)
so we get a lot of "failures". Setting the warning to when
the failure is below <30% that should not trigger the 'failed' state.
@jryates jryates merged commit c1292dd into wannier-developers:develop Jun 21, 2018
@giovannipizzi giovannipizzi deleted the fix_128_parallel_stylistic branch June 21, 2018 13:44
manxkim pushed a commit to manxkim/wannier90 that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2021
…parallel_stylistic

Fix a few stylistic issues with the new parallel code
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants