-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Syntax highlighting for html techniques #3381
Conversation
* add support for syntax highlighting * update one example
* added support for syntax highlighting * updated resources link
* syntax highlighting * replaced HTML 4.01 link to living standard
* support for syntax highlighting * replaced HTML 4.01 link to living standard
* syntax highlighting * replaced out of date resource link
Note: this technique should be retired. See: [issue 1234](#1234)
* add support for syntax highlighting * update links from W3C HTML spec to WHATWG * add lang support for change of languages * removed references to XHTML and HTML5
* add support for syntax highlighting * remove references to XHTML * update Resources links * remove test to check that `td` elements have `scope` attribute as that’s invalid HTML now * swapped a male name for a female one
* add support for syntax highlighting * remove references to HTML 4.01
Should be safe, as H100.html already does this and renders fine. Should probably be run over entire repo
Discussed on call 1/12. We noted need for Preview and that build errors need to be resolved. |
I started, there's a few tricky conflicts and it won't build yet, so it's taking a while. |
# Conflicts: # techniques/html/H59.html # techniques/html/H63.html
Merge conflicts resolved, build working, and preview looks good. @mbgower Let's move this one across the board quickly before we get more merge conflicts! |
@alastc not easily finding a link to the preview; can you please post? |
@fstrr either you or @patrickhlauke was going to clean these conflicts up as part of whichever of your holistic PRs was regarded as the 'top gun'. Have you had a chance to discuss? |
@mbgower I'm working on it. Got a bunch of merge conflicts to deal with, but am hoping to get this finished and pushed up today. |
@mbgower @patrickhlauke I merged our two branches and I think everything's good. Definitely needs a good look to be sure. |
superseded by #3757 |
Merges #3381 and #3738 to: - update / correct WCAG links - update resource links - add support for syntax highlighting - remove references to XHTML Closes #3381 Closes #3738 --------- Co-authored-by: Patrick H. Lauke <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alastair Campbell <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bruce Bailey <[email protected]>
Also: