-
§ Success Criterion 1.4.7 Low or No Background Audio has a part that says:
This confused me. As far as I know, the Bel is a base 10 logarithmic scale, and 20 decibel would therefore equal 2 bel or a factor of 10² or one-hundred. Which is much more in line with my understanding of a 20 decibel sound difference. Hint: Think of the difference between a band with five musicians (all equally loud), where one plays a completely different song than the other four. Versus the same situation with a orchestra of 101 musicians where still one plays the wrong song. In the second case, the one musician that's off, can be considered low background noise. In the first case it's a terrible nuisance. Is this an error in the NOTE section of the document? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
Indeed, well spotted. 20dB indeed shakes out to something being 100 times louder/quieter, which now makes me wonder if it's the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think that the signal-to-noise ratio here is based on Sound Pressure Level difference. SPL (dB) is calculated by 20×log(P/P0) where P0 is the reference pressure (by definition 20 micro pascals). So the 20 dB SNR means 20×log(P1/P0) - 20×log(P2/P0) = 20, therefore P1 should be 10 times P2. Not 4 times anyway. Extra note: I would like to recommend the "Back to Basics: Speech Audiometry" article. Killion and colleagues (2004) suggest that a person with severe SNR loss would require more than 15 decibel signal-to-noise ratio to obtain 50% speech understanding. (QuickSIN test uses 25 dB SNR at max.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
"four times" is from the linked article in the understanding: https://ds.gpii.net/content/about-decibels-db
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the answers. I think the 20dB is correct, based on my personal "gut feeling", and @JediLin's citation. However, it's interesting that the note may be right when it comes to perception of loudness. As this is a psychoacoustic matter, it's probably based on research on a large amount of people. I've worked in audio engineering, so it's possible that my personal perception has been calibrated away from the "default" towards the absolute decibel factor used by audio equipment. Maybe the note could be updated to read: Per the definition of "decibel," background sound that meets this requirement will be perceived approximately four times quieter than the foreground speech content. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
so the note is just badly handwaving things / not clarifying what it actually means. I'd suggest proposing a change to the definition's note in a PR |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I suggest we use DBA going forward to avoid confusion
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
"four times" is from the linked article in the understanding: https://ds.gpii.net/content/about-decibels-db