-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a test that ensures fetchStart
matches the SW's fetch event start time
#148
Comments
This was referenced May 18, 2021
noamr
added a commit
to web-platform-tests/wpt
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2021
Mark the timing inside the service worker (and adjust by timeOrigin), to make sure the timing reported to Navigation Timing correspond with the milestones specified in https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#service-worker-timing. The four relevant milestones which should be in order: - PerformanceNavigationTiming.workerStart - Finish the activation event - PerformanceNavigationTiming.fetchStart - Handling the Fetch event in the worker This is to ensure that the difference between workerStart and fetchStart measures the delay caused by service worker activation. See w3c/navigation-timing#148
noamr
added a commit
to web-platform-tests/wpt
that referenced
this issue
Oct 11, 2021
Mark the timing inside the service worker (and adjust by timeOrigin), to make sure the timing reported to Navigation Timing correspond with the milestones specified in https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#service-worker-timing. The four relevant milestones which should be in order: - PerformanceNavigationTiming.workerStart - Finish the activation event - PerformanceNavigationTiming.fetchStart - Handling the Fetch event in the worker This is to ensure that the difference between workerStart and fetchStart measures the delay caused by service worker activation. See w3c/navigation-timing#148
noamr
added a commit
to web-platform-tests/wpt
that referenced
this issue
Oct 12, 2021
* [navigation-timing]: Test fine-grained Service Worker timing Mark the timing inside the service worker (and adjust by timeOrigin), to make sure the timing reported to Navigation Timing correspond with the milestones specified in https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#service-worker-timing. The four relevant milestones which should be in order: - PerformanceNavigationTiming.workerStart - Finish the activation event - PerformanceNavigationTiming.fetchStart - Handling the Fetch event in the worker This is to ensure that the difference between workerStart and fetchStart measures the delay caused by service worker activation. See w3c/navigation-timing#148 * Use step_timeout * Remove unnecessary timeouts
moz-v2v-gh
pushed a commit
to mozilla/gecko-dev
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2021
…ervice Worker timing, a=testonly Automatic update from web-platform-tests [navigation-timing]: Test fine-grained Service Worker timing (#31187) * [navigation-timing]: Test fine-grained Service Worker timing Mark the timing inside the service worker (and adjust by timeOrigin), to make sure the timing reported to Navigation Timing correspond with the milestones specified in https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#service-worker-timing. The four relevant milestones which should be in order: - PerformanceNavigationTiming.workerStart - Finish the activation event - PerformanceNavigationTiming.fetchStart - Handling the Fetch event in the worker This is to ensure that the difference between workerStart and fetchStart measures the delay caused by service worker activation. See w3c/navigation-timing#148 * Use step_timeout * Remove unnecessary timeouts -- wpt-commits: 2f8b6be9749e160f9902c9b2f99b00cf7b74b238 wpt-pr: 31187
jamienicol
pushed a commit
to jamienicol/gecko
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2021
…ervice Worker timing, a=testonly Automatic update from web-platform-tests [navigation-timing]: Test fine-grained Service Worker timing (#31187) * [navigation-timing]: Test fine-grained Service Worker timing Mark the timing inside the service worker (and adjust by timeOrigin), to make sure the timing reported to Navigation Timing correspond with the milestones specified in https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#service-worker-timing. The four relevant milestones which should be in order: - PerformanceNavigationTiming.workerStart - Finish the activation event - PerformanceNavigationTiming.fetchStart - Handling the Fetch event in the worker This is to ensure that the difference between workerStart and fetchStart measures the delay caused by service worker activation. See w3c/navigation-timing#148 * Use step_timeout * Remove unnecessary timeouts -- wpt-commits: 2f8b6be9749e160f9902c9b2f99b00cf7b74b238 wpt-pr: 31187
Done |
Gabisampaio
pushed a commit
to Gabisampaio/wpt
that referenced
this issue
Nov 18, 2021
…tform-tests#31187) * [navigation-timing]: Test fine-grained Service Worker timing Mark the timing inside the service worker (and adjust by timeOrigin), to make sure the timing reported to Navigation Timing correspond with the milestones specified in https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#service-worker-timing. The four relevant milestones which should be in order: - PerformanceNavigationTiming.workerStart - Finish the activation event - PerformanceNavigationTiming.fetchStart - Handling the Fetch event in the worker This is to ensure that the difference between workerStart and fetchStart measures the delay caused by service worker activation. See w3c/navigation-timing#148 * Use step_timeout * Remove unnecessary timeouts
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Followup on #143.
We should extend NavigationTiming's SW test to cover matching times.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: