Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Registration Process resolutions from 2020-12-17 telecon. #240

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 31, 2021

Conversation

msporny
Copy link
Member

@msporny msporny commented Jan 24, 2021

Implement resolutions from 2020-12-17 telecon:

https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2020-12-17-did-topic#section2

Merging this will address w3c/did#425.


Preview | Diff

@msporny msporny requested a review from OR13 as a code owner January 24, 2021 19:49
@msporny msporny requested review from iherman and jandrieu January 24, 2021 19:49
@msporny msporny changed the title Implement resolutions from 2020-12-17 telecon. Implement Registration Process resolutions from 2020-12-17 telecon. Jan 24, 2021
Copy link
Member

@iherman iherman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@msporny I am not a process-geek... While I do not see any problems myself with the proposed text on the registration process, we may want to check this with those who are working on the process changes related to registries.

This being said, maybe this should be done once the WG has a consensus on the whole section, to avoid unnecessary interference. If that is the direction we choose (ie, involve outsiders later) then I am fine with the text

@msporny
Copy link
Member Author

msporny commented Jan 31, 2021

Normative, multiple reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging.

@msporny msporny merged commit fc8074e into master Jan 31, 2021
@msporny
Copy link
Member Author

msporny commented Jan 31, 2021

@msporny I am not a process-geek... While I do not see any problems myself with the proposed text on the registration process, we may want to check this with those who are working on the process changes related to registries.

Yes, agreed.

This being said, maybe this should be done once the WG has a consensus on the whole section, to avoid unnecessary interference. If that is the direction we choose (ie, involve outsiders later) then I am fine with the text

Yes, agree that we should wait for consensus from the WG -- I still think the process is going to change between now and Proposed Rec, so would want to see those settle in before taking it externally.

@msporny msporny deleted the msporny-issue-did-core-425 branch November 14, 2021 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants