Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore[ci]: increase concurrency #3870

Closed

Conversation

charles-cooper
Copy link
Member

What I did

How I did it

How to verify it

Commit message

Commit message for the final, squashed PR. (Optional, but reviewers will appreciate it! Please see our commit message style guide for what we would ideally like to see in a commit message.)

Description for the changelog

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

should reduce test time, especially when there are a high number of
cores
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.17%. Comparing base (8f05b4e) to head (6541008).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3870      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.21%   86.17%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines       14010    14010              
  Branches     3077     3077              
==========================================
- Hits        12079    12073       -6     
- Misses       1496     1500       +4     
- Partials      435      437       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Mar 17, 2024

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: pypi/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

@charles-cooper
Copy link
Member Author

i couldn't get the matrix to collect all the items properly

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants