Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add github_release alias for travis_release task #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2021

Conversation

bastelfreak
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@bastelfreak bastelfreak requested a review from ekohl October 2, 2021 11:23
@bastelfreak bastelfreak self-assigned this Oct 2, 2021
Copy link
Member

@smortex smortex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 the travis is confusing!

Maybe it is more future-proof to rename the existing implementation and add a task with the old name for backward compatibility?

And maybe we can also have a release task that also run github_release for even more future-proof-proofness 😄 ?

@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Oct 4, 2021

I also thought more about a generic name. release or module:release

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Member Author

@ekohl I thought about it, but I wanted to avoid collisions and I wasn't sure which namespace is the best. Do you have a suggestion? module:release doesn't sound to bad.

Copy link
Member

@smortex smortex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bastelfreak bastelfreak merged commit 0266140 into voxpupuli:master Oct 15, 2021
@bastelfreak bastelfreak deleted the github_release branch October 15, 2021 07:44
@@ -33,6 +33,11 @@
g.push!
end

desc 'Release via GitHub Actions (alias for travis_release)'
task :release do
Rake::Task['travis_release'].invoke
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I'd have preferred the other way around. Rename travis_release to release and add a travis_release for backwards compatibility. Then travis_release should also output a warning that it's deprecated.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we did that in #32

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah thanks. I see it didn't add a warning. That can still be a good addition.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#33

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants