refactor locations to remove a bit of redundancy #352
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
p.s. If you choose to merge this and #351, I'll need to tweak whichever goes second. I tried to keep both sets of changes isolated in case you only wanted one over the other. |
|
@jfryman any thoughts on this ? |
|
Looks alright. |
jfryman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2014
refactor locations to remove a bit of redundancy
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: I haven't extensively tested this (aside from
rake spec, which passed). Please look this over carefully before merging.