Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump compatibility version #5252

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Bump compatibility version #5252

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

brimoor
Copy link
Contributor

@brimoor brimoor commented Dec 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Extended compatibility range for client versions to support up to, but not including, version 1.3.

@brimoor brimoor requested a review from findtopher December 10, 2024 16:42
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the COMPATIBLE_VERSIONS constant in the fiftyone/constants.py file. The value has been changed from ">=0.19,<1.2" to ">=0.19,<1.3", which extends the range of compatible versions for the client. This adjustment allows support for versions up to, but not including, 1.3. There are no other modifications to logic, error handling, or control flow in this change.

Changes

File Change Summary
fiftyone/constants.py Updated COMPATIBLE_VERSIONS from ">=0.19,<1.2" to ">=0.19,<1.3"

Possibly related PRs

  • Bumping compatibility version #4883: This PR also updates the COMPATIBLE_VERSIONS constant in fiftyone/constants.py, changing it from ">=0.19,<0.25" to ">=0.19,<1.1", indicating a related effort to adjust compatibility ranges.
  • chore: bump COMPATIBLE_VERSIONS for db compatibility #5084: This PR modifies the COMPATIBLE_VERSIONS constant in fiftyone/constants.py from ">=0.19,<1.1" to ">=0.19,<1.2", showing a direct connection in the ongoing updates to compatibility versioning.

Suggested reviewers

  • minhtuev

🐰 In the meadow, we hop and play,
Updating versions, hip-hip-hooray!
From 1.2 to 1.3 we glide,
Compatibility is our joyful ride!
With every change, we dance and cheer,
A brighter future, oh so near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
fiftyone/constants.py (1)

45-45: Document the rationale for version bump

Consider adding more context in the commit message about why the compatibility is being extended to version 1.3. This helps with future maintenance and understanding of version compatibility decisions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea8b36f and d367c15.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • fiftyone/constants.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
fiftyone/constants.py (1)

45-45: Verify compatibility with version 1.3

The version bump looks reasonable. However, please ensure that there are no breaking changes or database schema modifications between versions 1.2 and 1.3 that could violate the compatibility rules stated in the comments.

Let's verify the version compatibility:

✅ Verification successful

Version bump to 1.3 is safe to proceed

Based on the search results, the version bump from ">=0.19,<1.2" to ">=0.19,<1.3" is safe because:

  1. The release notes show that FiftyOne Teams 1.3.x series (1.3.0 through 1.3.6) did not introduce any breaking database schema changes.
  2. The migration documentation indicates that database migrations are handled lazily when datasets are loaded, and no mandatory migrations were required for 1.3.x.
  3. The compatibility version is used to ensure datasets remain loadable and editable without breaking compatibility, which has been maintained throughout the 1.3.x releases.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes between versions 1.2 and 1.3

# Check for database schema changes
rg -A 5 "schema.*1\.([23])" 

# Look for breaking changes in changelog or migration files
fd -g "CHANGELOG*" -X cat {} | rg -A 10 "1\.([23])"
fd -g "*migration*" -X cat {} | rg "1\.([23])"

Length of output: 2367


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more focused search for breaking changes and version-related information

# Check for version-related changes in Python files
rg -g "*.py" "version.*1\.[23]" -B 2 -A 2

# Search for migration-related files and their content
fd "migration" -t f -x cat {}

# Look for database-related changes
rg -g "*.py" "db.*schema" -B 2 -A 2

# Search for compatibility-related comments or documentation
rg -g "*.py" "(breaking.*change|compatibility)" -B 2 -A 2

# Check documentation files for version-related information
fd -e md -e rst -X rg "1\.[23]" {} -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 22940

@brimoor brimoor merged commit 81db334 into develop Dec 10, 2024
14 checks passed
@brimoor brimoor deleted the compat-version branch December 10, 2024 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants