Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retain browser setting for modal dynamic groups #5149

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

benjaminpkane
Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane commented Nov 19, 2024

Retain browser setting for dynamic groups mode

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new selector for managing dynamic group view modes, allowing for more flexible state handling.
    • Updated the dynamic group view mode atom to support null values, enhancing configuration options.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated references to dynamic group view modes, streamlining modal state management.

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane added bug Bug fixes app Issues related to App features labels Nov 19, 2024
@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane self-assigned this Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the useSetModalState.ts and options.ts files related to the management of the dynamicGroupsViewMode state. In useSetModalState.ts, references to dynamicGroupsViewMode have been removed from the data array. In options.ts, the dynamicGroupsViewMode atomFamily has been renamed and its type updated to allow null values, along with the introduction of a new selectorFamily for enhanced state handling.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/packages/state/src/hooks/useSetModalState.ts Removed references to dynamicGroupsViewMode from the data array in the default exported function.
app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts Added import for DefaultValue, renamed dynamicGroupsViewMode to dynamicGroupsViewModeStore, updated its type to allow null, changed its default value to null, and introduced a new dynamicGroupsViewMode selectorFamily.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix dynamic groups carousel bug #4863: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the dynamicGroupsViewMode state management, which is directly related to the removal of dynamicGroupsViewMode references in the main PR, indicating a connection in how modal state is managed.

Suggested reviewers

  • brimoor
  • ritch

Poem

In the burrow where changes bloom,
Dynamic views now find more room.
With states that shift and atoms that play,
Our modal dance finds a new way!
Hops of joy, we celebrate,
For flexibility is truly great! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane marked this pull request as draft November 19, 2024 18:15
@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2024 14:09
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts (1)

71-93: LGTM: Well-implemented selector with proper fallback handling

The selector implementation is robust:

  • Proper fallback logic for null values
  • Correct handling of DefaultValue for resets
  • Type-safe implementation

However, consider adding a comment explaining the fallback logic for better maintainability:

  get:
    (modal: boolean) =>
    ({ get }) => {
      const value = get(dynamicGroupsViewModeStore(modal));

+     // For modal views, try to use the main view's setting as fallback
      if (!value) {
        return modal
          ? get(dynamicGroupsViewModeStore(false)) ?? "pagination"
          : "pagination";
      }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a40599 and baa11a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/packages/state/src/hooks/useSetModalState.ts (0 hunks)
  • app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • app/packages/state/src/hooks/useSetModalState.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts (2)

7-7: LGTM: Import statement is correctly structured

The DefaultValue import is properly added and grouped with other Recoil imports.


58-67: LGTM: Well-structured atomFamily with persistence

The atomFamily is well-designed with:

  • Clear naming indicating its storage role
  • Proper type definition including null for initialization
  • Browser storage effect for persistence

effects: (modal) => [
getBrowserStorageEffectForKey(`dynamicGroupsViewMode-${modal}`),
],
});

export const dynamicGroupsViewMode = selectorFamily({
key: "dynamicGroupsViewModeStore",
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix potential key conflict in selector definition

The selector is using the same key as the atomFamily ("dynamicGroupsViewModeStore"), which could cause state management issues.

-  key: "dynamicGroupsViewModeStore",
+  key: "dynamicGroupsViewMode",
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
key: "dynamicGroupsViewModeStore",
key: "dynamicGroupsViewMode",

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐰 is right, there's a key conflict

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sashankaryal, glad you agree. Updating the selector's key to "dynamicGroupsViewMode" will resolve the conflict:

key: "dynamicGroupsViewMode",

Let me know if you need any further assistance.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ope

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!

effects: (modal) => [
getBrowserStorageEffectForKey(`dynamicGroupsViewMode-${modal}`),
],
});

export const dynamicGroupsViewMode = selectorFamily({
key: "dynamicGroupsViewModeStore",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐰 is right, there's a key conflict

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts (1)

84-93: Consider documenting the fallback behavior

The set implementation is correct, but consider adding a comment explaining the fallback behavior and why the modal view inherits from the grid view when no value is set.

 export const dynamicGroupsViewMode = selectorFamily({
   key: "dynamicGroupsViewMode",
   get:
     (modal: boolean) =>
     ({ get }) => {
       const value = get(dynamicGroupsViewModeStore(modal));
 
+      // Modal view inherits grid view settings when no value is set
+      // Fallback to pagination mode as the default view
       if (!value) {
         return modal
           ? get(dynamicGroupsViewModeStore(false)) ?? "pagination"
           : "pagination";
       }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between baa11a5 and 262f096.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/options.ts (3)

7-7: LGTM: Import changes are correct

The addition of DefaultValue import is appropriate for its usage in the selector's set function.


69-83: LGTM: Selector's get implementation is robust

The get function correctly:

  • Handles null values
  • Provides appropriate fallbacks
  • Considers modal state

58-67: LGTM: atomFamily implementation is well-structured

The implementation correctly:

  • Allows null values in the type signature
  • Uses browser storage for persistence
  • Has appropriate default value

Let's verify the browser storage implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the browser storage effect implementation further by checking its definition and usage.


Let me check one final aspect - the browser storage effect implementation.


Browser storage implementation is correctly used

The verification confirms that:

  • The dynamicGroupsViewModeStore atomFamily correctly uses the browser storage effect
  • The storage key is properly parameterized with the modal state (dynamicGroupsViewMode-${modal})
  • The implementation is consistently used across the codebase with proper selector integration
  • The browser storage effect is properly defined in customEffects.ts with appropriate type safety
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent browser storage key usage
rg -A 2 "getBrowserStorageEffectForKey.*dynamicGroupsViewMode" 

Length of output: 265


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of getBrowserStorageEffectForKey
ast-grep --pattern 'function getBrowserStorageEffectForKey($_) {
  $$$
}'

# Check for any other usage of dynamicGroupsViewMode in storage
rg "dynamicGroupsViewMode" -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 8657


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the browser storage effect implementation
rg -B 2 -A 5 "export const getBrowserStorageEffectForKey"

Length of output: 644

Copy link
Contributor

@sashankaryal sashankaryal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!!

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane merged commit dac2474 into release/v1.1.0 Nov 22, 2024
11 checks passed
@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane deleted the bugfix/dynamic-groups-setting branch November 22, 2024 21:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
app Issues related to App features bug Bug fixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants