-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge v2.1.2 to develop #5023
Merge v2.1.2 to develop #5023
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new release note section for "FiftyOne Teams 2.1.2," dated October 31, 2024. It primarily addresses a fix for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/source/release-notes.rst (1)
6-12
: Consider adding more context to the release note.The description of the
delegation_target
fix could be enhanced by:
- Explaining what a delegation_target is
- Describing the impact of the issue
- Providing an example scenario where this fix is relevant
FiftyOne Teams 2.1.2 -------------------- *Released October 31, 2024* -Fixed an issue that prevented `delegation_target` from being properly set when - running delegated operations with orchestrator registration enabled +Fixed an issue that prevented `delegation_target` (the target worker node) from being + properly set when running delegated operations with orchestrator registration enabled. + This could cause operations to execute on incorrect workers or fail to execute. + The fix ensures operations are routed to the intended worker nodes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/source/release-notes.rst
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/source/release-notes.rst (2)
Line range hint 1-3000
: LGTM! Documentation follows consistent formatting.
The release notes maintain good consistency in:
- Section headers with version numbers
- Date formatting
- Bullet point style
- Link formatting
8-8
: Verify the release date.
The release date is set to October 31, 2024, which is in the future. This suggests this is either:
- A pre-release draft version, or
- A placeholder date that needs to be updated
✅ Verification successful
Release date appears to be a placeholder for an upcoming release
Looking at the release history pattern, this is clearly a pre-release draft for an upcoming version. The dates in the release notes follow a chronological order, with October 31, 2024, being the latest future release date, while other recent releases (October 14, October 1, etc.) have already occurred. This is a common practice for documenting upcoming releases.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this appears to be a draft by looking for other future dates
rg -l "[A-Z][a-z]+ [0-9]{1,2}, 2024"
Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual content of dates in these files
rg "[A-Z][a-z]+ [0-9]{1,2}, 2024" docs/source/release-notes.rst docs/source/deprecation.rst
Length of output: 1883
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
merge release-notes back into develop
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
delegation_target
not being set correctly during delegated operations.Documentation