Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge v2.1.2 to develop #5023

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Merge v2.1.2 to develop #5023

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

findtopher
Copy link
Member

@findtopher findtopher commented Oct 31, 2024

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

merge release-notes back into develop

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced release notes for "FiftyOne Teams 2.1.2" highlighting improvements in delegated operations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved an issue with the delegation_target not being set correctly during delegated operations.
  • Documentation

    • Updated release notes for versions 2.1.1 and 2.1.0 to provide context for recent updates.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new release note section for "FiftyOne Teams 2.1.2," dated October 31, 2024. It primarily addresses a fix for the delegation_target not being set correctly during delegated operations with orchestrator registration enabled. Additionally, it updates the release notes for the previous versions, "FiftyOne Teams 2.1.1" and "FiftyOne Teams 2.1.0," without altering their content, thereby providing context for the latest changes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs/source/release-notes.rst Added release note for "FiftyOne Teams 2.1.2" and updated notes for "FiftyOne Teams 2.1.1" and "2.1.0".

Possibly related PRs

  • updated release notes #5021: This PR directly relates to the main PR as it also introduces a release note for "FiftyOne Teams 2.1.2," detailing the fix for the delegation_target issue during delegated operations, which is the primary focus of the main PR.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • brimoor

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A note for teams dispels the gloom.
Delegation now takes flight,
With targets set, all feels right!
Version two point one point two,
A hop ahead, we welcome you! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@findtopher findtopher requested review from a team October 31, 2024 15:35
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/source/release-notes.rst (1)

6-12: Consider adding more context to the release note.

The description of the delegation_target fix could be enhanced by:

  • Explaining what a delegation_target is
  • Describing the impact of the issue
  • Providing an example scenario where this fix is relevant
 FiftyOne Teams 2.1.2
 --------------------
 *Released October 31, 2024*
 
-Fixed an issue that prevented `delegation_target` from being properly set when
-  running delegated operations with orchestrator registration enabled
+Fixed an issue that prevented `delegation_target` (the target worker node) from being 
+  properly set when running delegated operations with orchestrator registration enabled.
+  This could cause operations to execute on incorrect workers or fail to execute.
+  The fix ensures operations are routed to the intended worker nodes.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3fb5962 and a33a068.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/source/release-notes.rst (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/source/release-notes.rst (2)

Line range hint 1-3000: LGTM! Documentation follows consistent formatting.

The release notes maintain good consistency in:

  • Section headers with version numbers
  • Date formatting
  • Bullet point style
  • Link formatting

8-8: Verify the release date.

The release date is set to October 31, 2024, which is in the future. This suggests this is either:

  1. A pre-release draft version, or
  2. A placeholder date that needs to be updated
✅ Verification successful

Release date appears to be a placeholder for an upcoming release

Looking at the release history pattern, this is clearly a pre-release draft for an upcoming version. The dates in the release notes follow a chronological order, with October 31, 2024, being the latest future release date, while other recent releases (October 14, October 1, etc.) have already occurred. This is a common practice for documenting upcoming releases.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if this appears to be a draft by looking for other future dates
rg -l "[A-Z][a-z]+ [0-9]{1,2}, 2024" 

Length of output: 96


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual content of dates in these files
rg "[A-Z][a-z]+ [0-9]{1,2}, 2024" docs/source/release-notes.rst docs/source/deprecation.rst

Length of output: 1883

@findtopher findtopher merged commit 84f7e27 into develop Oct 31, 2024
13 checks passed
@findtopher findtopher deleted the merge-v2.1.2-to-develop branch October 31, 2024 18:50
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants