Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix carousel lookers rendering as imavid in ordered dynamic groups #4938

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2024

Conversation

sashankaryal
Copy link
Contributor

@sashankaryal sashankaryal commented Oct 17, 2024

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Roughly speaking, the flow we use to decide whether to render image vs imavid looker is shown below:

useCreateLooker(isModal) -> shouldRenderImavid(isModal) -> image vs imavid looker

Notice how shouldRenderImavid itself is parametrized by the modal setting - this was introduced in #4676. For the flow to work correctly, useCreateLooker needs the appropriate prop. It was erroneously set to false in DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper and GroupCarousel::Column, causing lookers to be rendered as Imavid when grid's "render frames as video" setting was enabled. This PR fixes the issue by passing isModal = true for both cases.

How is this patch tested? If it is not, please explain why.

Existing E2E

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change that should be mentioned in the release notes?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release
    notes for FiftyOne users.

Description: Fixes an issue with image rendering in the carousel when grid’s render-frames-as-video setting is enabled.

What areas of FiftyOne does this PR affect?

  • App: FiftyOne application changes
  • Build: Build and test infrastructure changes
  • Core: Core fiftyone Python library changes
  • Documentation: FiftyOne documentation changes
  • Other

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced functionality of the Dynamic Groups Flashlight and Group Carousel components.
    • Improved highlight logic based on the current sample's state.
    • Updated flashlight behavior to respond to changes in the selected media field.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues with the lifecycle management of the flashlight instance.

@sashankaryal sashankaryal added bug Bug fixes app Issues related to App features labels Oct 17, 2024
@sashankaryal sashankaryal requested review from benjaminpkane and a team October 17, 2024 08:31
@sashankaryal sashankaryal self-assigned this Oct 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper and GroupCarousel components. The createLooker function's second argument has been changed from false to true, impacting the Looker instance's behavior. In DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper, useLayoutEffect hooks now include mediaField as a dependency, and the updateItem function has been enhanced to improve highlight logic. In GroupCarousel, a new highlight function has been added, and the lifecycle management of the flashlight instance has been refined.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper.tsx Updated useLayoutEffect to include mediaField dependency; modified updateItem for highlight logic.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/GroupCarousel.tsx Defined highlight function; updated createLooker parameters; refined lifecycle management of flashlight.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix dynamic groups carousel bug #4863: The changes in this PR directly modify the DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper component, which is also altered in the main PR, focusing on enhancing the component's performance and behavior in relation to the carousel functionality.

Suggested reviewers

  • Benjamin Kane
  • Ritch

🐰 In the garden where we play,
Changes bloom in bright array.
Flashlight shines with new delight,
Highlighted samples, oh what a sight!
With Looker’s magic, we explore,
Hopping through the code, we adore! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-185: Well-structured component with room for minor improvement

The DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper component is well-implemented, making good use of React hooks and Recoil for state management. The integration of the Flashlight instance and its lifecycle management is handled effectively.

To further improve code readability, consider extracting some of the complex logic (e.g., Flashlight initialization and update logic) into separate custom hooks or utility functions. This would make the main component more concise and easier to understand.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/GroupCarousel.tsx (2)

75-75: Approved: Fix for looker rendering issue.

The change from false to true in the useCreateLooker call addresses the issue mentioned in the PR objectives, fixing the rendering of image and Imavid lookers.

Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of this boolean value for future maintainability. For example:

useCreateLooker(
  true, // Set to true to enable correct rendering for image and Imavid lookers
  true,
  // ... rest of the arguments
)

Line range hint 77-80: Approved: New highlight function improves group visualization.

The newly added highlight function enhances the component by determining which samples should be highlighted based on their group. This improvement aligns with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary.

Consider adding type annotations to improve code clarity:

const highlight = useCallback(
  (sample: Sample): boolean => get(sample, groupField).name === currentSlice,
  [currentSlice, groupField]
);

This change would make the function's input and output types explicit, enhancing code readability and type safety.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f1d133 and 65edbb4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/GroupCarousel.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/GroupCarousel.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (4)
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/DynamicGroup/carousel/DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper.tsx (3)

62-62: Approved: Key fix for looker rendering issue

This change from false to true in the useCreateLooker hook is crucial for addressing the main objective of this PR. It ensures that lookers are created with the correct configuration, fixing the issue where image lookers were incorrectly rendered as Imavid lookers.


Line range hint 122-133: Correct usage of dependencies in useLayoutEffect hooks

The useLayoutEffect hooks in this component have appropriate dependency arrays:

  1. The first hook (lines 122-133) correctly includes mediaField, ensuring that the flashlight is reset when the selected media field changes.
  2. The second hook (lines 149-157) has a comprehensive list of dependencies (deferred, flashlight, updateItem, options, selected) that trigger updates to flashlight items when relevant data changes.

This implementation ensures that the component responds correctly to changes in its dependencies, maintaining consistency between the state and the UI.

Also applies to: 149-157


Line range hint 1-185: Summary: Approved changes with minor improvement suggestions

The changes in this file successfully address the main objective of the PR by fixing the looker rendering issue. The overall implementation of the DynamicGroupsFlashlightWrapper component is of high quality, with proper use of React hooks and Recoil for state management.

Key points:

  1. The critical fix on line 62 resolves the looker rendering problem.
  2. The component structure and lifecycle management are well-implemented.
  3. Dependencies in useLayoutEffect hooks are correctly specified.

While the current implementation is approved, consider the earlier suggestion to extract complex logic into separate hooks or utility functions for improved readability in future iterations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/Group/GroupCarousel.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-238: Summary: Changes effectively address the PR objectives.

The modifications in this file successfully tackle the rendering issue for image and Imavid lookers in the group carousel. The changes are minimal yet impactful, maintaining good code quality and adhering to React and TypeScript best practices. The new highlight function and the adjustment to useCreateLooker work together to improve the visualization of grouped samples.

While the changes are approved, consider implementing the minor suggestions provided in the previous comments to further enhance code clarity and maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure how existing e2e covers this, but makes sense to me. My mistake

@sashankaryal sashankaryal merged commit adad569 into develop Oct 19, 2024
11 checks passed
@sashankaryal sashankaryal deleted the fix/imavid-hover-render branch October 19, 2024 08:15
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2024
5 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2024
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
app Issues related to App features bug Bug fixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants