Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry picks for release/v1.0.1 #4896

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

Cherry picks for release/v1.0.1 #4896

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

benjaminpkane
Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane commented Oct 4, 2024

Adds #4876 and #4878 to release/v1.0.1

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new VideoLookerReact component for enhanced video playback functionality.
    • Added useLooker and useKeyEvents hooks for improved event handling and lifecycle management.
    • New methods for managing video state and frame handling in the VideoLooker class.
  • Improvements

    • Refactored ModalLooker and ModalLookerNoTimeline components for better clarity and maintainability.
    • Enhanced state management for video configurations, including timeline support.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined event handling to improve responsiveness during video playback.

sashankaryal and others added 2 commits October 4, 2024 17:55
* add dynamic embedded document field type for rrd files

* add schema utils to work with embedded doc type fields

* add versioned renderer with url+metadata support

* remove explicit version
* organizing

* rm Tmp

* cleanup

* add example back

* cleaning

* useKeyEvents hook

* after load handling

* fix import

* enable timeline

* default to true

* refreshers
@benjaminpkane benjaminpkane self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant modifications across multiple components related to video playback and looker functionality. Key changes include the refactoring of the ImaVidLookerReact and ModalLooker components, the introduction of new hooks for managing looker options and keyboard events, and the addition of a new VideoLookerReact component for video playback. Import statements have been updated for better organization, and several interfaces and methods have been modified to enhance functionality and maintainability.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx Imports updated; useKeyEvents replaces hoveredSample handling; useEffect hooks modified to simplify state management.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ModalLooker.tsx Removed AbstractLooker import; added ImageLooker type; refactored ModalLookerNoTimeline to use useLooker hook; made sample property required in LookerProps.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/VideoLooker.tsx New VideoLookerReact component added for video playback; integrates FiftyOne hooks for playback and timeline management.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/hooks.ts New hook useLookerOptionsUpdate added for updating looker options in Recoil state.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-key-events.ts New custom hook for managing keyboard events based on hovered sample; includes hoveredSampleId selector.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-looker.ts New hook useLooker introduced to manage looker lifecycle and interactions; includes state management and event handlers.
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/utils.ts New function shortcutToHelpItems added for processing shortcut items.
app/packages/looker/src/elements/base.ts Updated boot method to use optional chaining for adding event listeners.
app/packages/looker/src/elements/common/looker.ts Updated import statements to use type-only imports; modified destructuring in getEvents method.
app/packages/looker/src/index.ts Export updated to include getFrameNumber along with freeVideos.
app/packages/looker/src/lookers/imavid/index.ts New export BUFFERING_PAUSE_TIMEOUT added from ./constants.
app/packages/looker/src/lookers/video.ts New method getVideo added; postProcess method updated for timeline handling.
app/packages/looker/src/state.ts BaseOptions and VideoConfig interfaces updated to include new properties for key event handling and timeline functionality.
app/packages/state/src/hooks/useCreateLooker.ts Function signature updated to include enableTimeline parameter in looker configuration.
app/packages/state/src/recoil/modal.ts modalLooker atom type updated for more specific state management.
app/packages/state/src/utils.ts getStandardizedUrls function updated to handle ModalSample["urls"].
app/packages/utilities/src/schema.test.ts Schema updates and new test cases added for embedded document types.
app/packages/utilities/src/schema.ts New functions getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType and doesSchemaContainEmbeddedDocType added for schema handling.
e2e-pw/src/oss/poms/modal/imavid-controls.ts New private method waitUntilBufferingIsFinished added to improve play/pause functionality.
fiftyone/server/metadata.py New import for RrdFile added to _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS.
fiftyone/utils/rerun.py New file rerun.py added with RrdFile class for handling rerun data files.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sashankaryal
  • brimoor

Poem

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A looker brightens every room.
With hooks that dance and videos play,
New paths to joy, we hop and sway.
So let us cheer for code so bright,
A rabbit's dream in morning light! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

sashankaryal
sashankaryal previously approved these changes Oct 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sashankaryal sashankaryal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 12

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
app/packages/looker/src/index.ts (1)

6-6: LGTM! Consider grouping related exports.

The addition of getFrameNumber to the exports is correct and follows TypeScript best practices. This change aligns with the PR objectives for cherry-picking specific changes.

For improved readability and maintainability, consider grouping related exports from the same module. You could move this line next to other exports from ./elements/util if there are any, or consider creating a separate export statement for utility functions if this becomes a pattern.

fiftyone/utils/rerun.py (1)

14-22: Enhance the class docstring for better clarity.

The class docstring provides useful information, but it could be improved for better clarity and consistency with Python documentation standards.

Consider updating the docstring as follows:

class RrdFile(DynamicEmbeddedDocument, fol._HasMedia):
    """Class for storing a rerun data (rrd) file and its associated metadata.

    Attributes:
        filepath (str): The path to the rrd file.
        version (str): The version of the rrd file.
    """

This change:

  1. Uses "Attributes" instead of "Args" since these are class attributes.
  2. Specifies the types of the attributes (str).
  3. Capitalizes the attribute descriptions for consistency.
app/packages/utilities/src/schema.ts (2)

55-74: LGTM! Consider a minor readability improvement.

The implementation of getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType is correct and efficient. It properly traverses the schema recursively and collects fields with the specified embeddedDocType.

For improved readability, consider using the Array.prototype.push method with spread syntax to add all matching fields at once:

 function recurse(schema: Schema) {
-  for (const field of Object.values(schema ?? {})) {
-    if (field.embeddedDocType === embeddedDocType) {
-      result.push(field);
-    }
+  result.push(...Object.values(schema ?? {}).filter(field => field.embeddedDocType === embeddedDocType));
+  for (const field of Object.values(schema ?? {})) {
     if (field.fields) {
       recurse(field.fields);
     }
   }
 }

This change would make the code more concise and potentially more efficient by reducing the number of array mutations.


76-93: LGTM! Consider simplifying the recursive function.

The implementation of doesSchemaContainEmbeddedDocType is correct and efficient. It properly traverses the schema recursively and short-circuits when a matching embeddedDocType is found.

Consider simplifying the recursive function for improved readability:

 export function doesSchemaContainEmbeddedDocType(
   schema: Schema,
   embeddedDocType: string
 ): boolean {
-  function recurse(schema: Schema): boolean {
-    return Object.values(schema ?? {}).some((field) => {
-      if (field.embeddedDocType === embeddedDocType) {
-        return true;
-      }
-      if (field.fields) {
-        return recurse(field.fields);
-      }
-      return false;
-    });
-  }
+  const recurse = (schema: Schema): boolean =>
+    Object.values(schema ?? {}).some(
+      (field) =>
+        field.embeddedDocType === embeddedDocType ||
+        (field.fields && recurse(field.fields))
+    );

   return recurse(schema);
 }

This refactored version:

  1. Uses an arrow function for conciseness.
  2. Simplifies the logic by combining conditions.
  3. Eliminates the need for explicit return statements.

The resulting code is more readable and maintains the same functionality and efficiency.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/hooks.ts (1)

22-41: Good implementation, but type safety can be improved

The useLookerOptionsUpdate hook is well-implemented using Recoil patterns. However, there are a few improvements we can make:

  1. Replace the {} type with a more specific type for better type safety.
  2. Add JSDoc comments to improve documentation.

Here's a suggested refactor:

/**
 * Options for the Looker component
 */
type LookerOptions = {
  // Define the structure of your options here
  // For example:
  // showJSON?: boolean;
  // showHelp?: boolean;
  // Add other properties as needed
};

/**
 * Hook to update Looker options
 * @returns A function to update Looker options
 */
export const useLookerOptionsUpdate = () => {
  return useRecoilCallback(
    ({ snapshot, set }) =>
      async (update: Partial<LookerOptions>, updater?: (updated: LookerOptions) => void) => {
        const currentOptions = await snapshot.getPromise(
          fos.savedLookerOptions
        );

        const panels = await snapshot.getPromise(fos.lookerPanels);
        const updated: LookerOptions = {
          ...currentOptions,
          ...update,
          showJSON: panels.json.isOpen,
          showHelp: panels.help.isOpen,
        };
        set(fos.savedLookerOptions, updated);
        if (updater) updater(updated);
      }
  );
};

This refactor:

  1. Introduces a LookerOptions type for better type safety.
  2. Uses Partial<LookerOptions> for the update parameter to allow partial updates.
  3. Adds JSDoc comments for better documentation.

Please adjust the LookerOptions type to match your actual options structure.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 25-25: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)

app/packages/looker/src/elements/common/looker.ts (2)

29-33: Improved state destructuring in keydown event handler

The changes to the state destructuring in the keydown event handler are good:

  1. Accessing shouldHandleKeyEvents through options reflects an update in the state structure, improving consistency.
  2. The destructuring is clear and follows TypeScript best practices.

To further enhance readability, consider using an interface or type for the state shape:

interface LookerState extends BaseState {
  SHORTCUTS: Record<string, Control>;
  error: boolean;
  options: {
    shouldHandleKeyEvents: boolean;
  };
}

This would make the state structure more explicit and self-documenting.


52-52: Consistent state destructuring in keyup event handler

The change to the state destructuring in the keyup event handler is good and consistent with the keydown handler. This maintains a uniform approach to accessing state properties across different event handlers.

For improved consistency with the keydown handler and better readability, consider using multi-line destructuring:

update(({ 
  SHORTCUTS, 
  error, 
  options: { shouldHandleKeyEvents } 
}) => {
  // ... rest of the function
});

This format aligns with the keydown handler and makes the destructured properties easier to read at a glance.

e2e-pw/src/oss/poms/modal/imavid-controls.ts (1)

35-42: Approve implementation with a suggestion for timeout

The waitUntilBufferingIsFinished method is well-implemented and follows good E2E testing practices by using data attributes. However, consider adding a timeout to prevent potential infinite waiting.

Consider modifying the method to include a timeout:

private async waitUntilBufferingIsFinished(timeout = 30000) {
  await this.page.waitForFunction(
    () =>
      document
        .querySelector("[data-cy=imavid-playhead]")
        ?.getAttribute("data-playhead-state") !== "buffering",
    { timeout }
  );
}

This change allows for a configurable timeout and prevents the test from hanging indefinitely if buffering doesn't complete.

app/packages/state/src/recoil/modal.ts (1)

1-1: LGTM! Consider grouping related imports.

The changes to the import statements look good. Removing unused imports and adding the necessary Lookers type improves code cleanliness.

Consider grouping related imports together. For example, you could move the Lookers import next to other imports from "@fiftyone/looker" for better organization:

import { PointInfo, type Sample } from "@fiftyone/looker";
import type { Lookers } from "../hooks";

Also applies to: 6-6

app/packages/state/src/hooks/useCreateLooker.ts (2)

39-40: New optional parameter added for enhanced flexibility

The addition of the enableTimeline optional parameter is a good enhancement, providing more control over the looker instance configuration. This change maintains backward compatibility while extending functionality.

Consider adding a JSDoc comment to describe the purpose and expected values of the enableTimeline parameter. This would improve the function's documentation and help other developers understand its usage.


116-116: Enhanced configuration options for looker instance

The addition of enableTimeline and shouldHandleKeyEvents properties to the config object enhances the flexibility and control over the looker instance. These changes are consistent with the function signature update and provide logical configuration options.

For consistency, consider grouping related configuration properties together. You might want to move the shouldHandleKeyEvents property closer to the enableTimeline property in the config object, as they both relate to user interaction settings.

Also applies to: 137-137

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx (4)

20-26: Improved import organization

The refactoring of imports enhances code organization by moving hooks to a separate file. This is a good practice for maintainability and readability.

Consider grouping related imports together. For example, you could group all hooks imports:

import {
  useClearSelectedLabels,
  useShowOverlays,
  useInitializeImaVidSubscriptions,
  useModalContext,
} from "./hooks";
import useKeyEvents from "./use-key-events";

136-136: Effective use of custom hooks

The introduction of the useKeyEvents hook simplifies the component's logic by encapsulating key event handling. This aligns with React best practices for code organization and reusability.

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the useKeyEvents hook for better code documentation:

// Handle keyboard events for navigation and interaction within the looker
useKeyEvents(initialRef, sample._id, looker);

Line range hint 36-364: Consider component decomposition for improved maintainability

The ImaVidLookerReact component is well-structured but quite complex. To enhance maintainability and readability, consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused components. For example:

  1. Extract the timeline-related logic into a separate TimelineManager component.
  2. Create a FrameRenderer component to handle frame rendering and buffering.
  3. Move the event handling logic into a custom hook, e.g., useLookerEvents.

This decomposition would make the code easier to understand, test, and maintain.

Would you like assistance in creating a plan for this refactoring?


Line range hint 36-364: Enhance TypeScript usage for improved type safety

While the component effectively uses TypeScript, there are opportunities to improve type safety:

  1. Replace type assertions like as ImaVidLooker with proper type guards or generics where possible.
  2. Consider using more specific types for event handlers, e.g., React.MouseEvent<HTMLDivElement> instead of just Event.
  3. Explicitly type the return value of functions and methods, especially for complex objects.

Example improvement:

// Before
const handleError = useErrorHandler();
useEventHandler(looker, "error", (event) => handleError(event.detail));

// After
const handleError = useErrorHandler();
useEventHandler(looker, "error", (event: CustomEvent<Error>) => handleError(event.detail));

These changes will enhance type safety and make the code more self-documenting.

Would you like assistance in implementing these TypeScript improvements?

app/packages/looker/src/state.ts (1)

178-178: LGTM with a minor suggestion.

The addition of shouldHandleKeyEvents as an optional boolean property to the BaseOptions interface is a good improvement. It allows for more granular control over key event handling while maintaining backward compatibility.

Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment to explain the purpose and default behavior of this property. For example:

/**
 * Whether key events should be handled. If not set, defaults to true.
 */
shouldHandleKeyEvents?: boolean;
fiftyone/server/metadata.py (1)

Line range hint 27-37: Suggestion: Add documentation for RrdFile integration

The changes to add support for RrdFile look good. However, it would be beneficial to add a brief comment or documentation explaining the purpose of RrdFile and its role in the metadata handling system. This would help other developers understand the rationale behind these changes and how RrdFile fits into the larger picture.

Consider adding a comment above the _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS dictionary or updating the module's docstring to include information about RrdFile.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-key-events.ts (2)

7-12: Consistent Naming Convention for Recoil Selectors

The hoveredSampleId selector is well-defined. For better maintainability and consistency, consider following a naming convention that distinguishes selectors from atoms, such as prefixing with select or suffixing with Selector.


14-18: Name the Default Exported Function for Better Debugging

The anonymous default export can make debugging more difficult since stack traces may not display a function name. Consider naming the function to enhance readability and debugging.

Apply this change:

-export default function (
+export default function useKeyEvents(
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/VideoLooker.tsx (1)

38-38: Reevaluate inclusion of data-cy attribute in production

The data-cy attribute is typically used for end-to-end testing with tools like Cypress. Consider whether it should be included in production code or if it can be conditionally added during testing builds.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17e8e53 and a14f30a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • app/packages/looker/package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • app/yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx (2 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ModalLooker.tsx (3 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/VideoLooker.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/hooks.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-key-events.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-looker.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/utils.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/looker/src/elements/base.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/looker/src/elements/common/looker.ts (3 hunks)
  • app/packages/looker/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/looker/src/lookers/imavid/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/looker/src/lookers/video.ts (3 hunks)
  • app/packages/looker/src/state.ts (3 hunks)
  • app/packages/state/src/hooks/useCreateLooker.ts (4 hunks)
  • app/packages/state/src/recoil/modal.ts (3 hunks)
  • app/packages/state/src/utils.ts (2 hunks)
  • app/packages/utilities/src/schema.test.ts (7 hunks)
  • app/packages/utilities/src/schema.ts (1 hunks)
  • e2e-pw/src/oss/poms/modal/imavid-controls.ts (1 hunks)
  • fiftyone/server/metadata.py (2 hunks)
  • fiftyone/utils/rerun.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (19)
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ModalLooker.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/VideoLooker.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/hooks.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-key-events.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-looker.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/utils.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/looker/src/elements/base.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/looker/src/elements/common/looker.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/looker/src/index.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/looker/src/lookers/imavid/index.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/looker/src/lookers/video.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/looker/src/state.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/state/src/hooks/useCreateLooker.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/state/src/recoil/modal.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/state/src/utils.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/utilities/src/schema.test.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/utilities/src/schema.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

e2e-pw/src/oss/poms/modal/imavid-controls.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🪛 Biome
app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/hooks.ts

[error] 25-25: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)

🔇 Additional comments (36)
fiftyone/utils/rerun.py (3)

1-11: LGTM: File structure and imports are appropriate.

The file structure is well-organized with a clear module docstring, copyright information, and relevant imports from the fiftyone package. This sets up the file correctly for the implementation of Rerun utilities.


24-25: LGTM: Class attributes are well-defined.

The filepath and version attributes are appropriately defined as StringFields, which is suitable for storing the path to the rrd file and its version, respectively.


1-25: Overall assessment: Well-implemented new utility for Rerun integration.

This new file introduces a concise and focused implementation for handling Rerun data files. The RrdFile class is well-structured and provides the necessary attributes for storing rrd file information. The implementation aligns with the PR objectives and seems appropriate for the intended purpose.

Minor improvements to the docstring have been suggested, but overall, the code is of good quality and ready for integration into the release.

app/packages/looker/src/elements/base.ts (1)

67-67: Improved null checking with optional chaining

The change from this.element && to this.element?. is a good improvement. It uses the optional chaining operator, which is a more modern and expressive way to handle potentially null or undefined values. This change maintains the same functionality while making the code more concise and aligned with TypeScript best practices.

app/packages/looker/src/elements/common/looker.ts (1)

6-9: Improved import statements

The changes to the import statements are beneficial:

  1. Using import type for BaseState, Control, and Events is a TypeScript best practice for type-only imports. This can lead to better performance and clearer code intentions.
  2. Separating the ControlEventKeyType import allows for more granular control over what's being imported, potentially reducing bundle size.

These changes align well with TypeScript best practices and should be maintained.

e2e-pw/src/oss/poms/modal/imavid-controls.ts (2)

45-50: Approve changes to togglePlay method

The addition of waitUntilBufferingIsFinished at the beginning of the togglePlay method is a good improvement. It ensures that the play/pause action only occurs after buffering is complete, which should increase the reliability of the test.

The blank line added after the new method call improves readability by clearly separating the new buffering check from the existing logic.


Line range hint 1-150: Summary of changes

The changes in this file improve the reliability of video playback control in E2E tests by introducing a method to wait for buffering to complete before toggling play/pause. The implementation follows TypeScript and Playwright best practices, and aligns well with the PR objectives of cherry-picking specific changes for a release.

These modifications enhance the robustness of the E2E tests without introducing significant complexity, which is beneficial for maintaining test stability in the release branch.

app/packages/state/src/utils.ts (1)

21-21: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly

The addition of ModalSample to the import statement is consistent with its usage in the updated function signature. This change enhances type safety and improves code clarity.

app/packages/looker/src/lookers/imavid/index.ts (1)

18-18: LGTM. Verify the intentionality of the new export.

The addition of this export statement looks good. It makes BUFFERING_PAUSE_TIMEOUT available to other modules that import from this file.

To ensure this change is intentional and doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please run the following script:

app/packages/state/src/recoil/modal.ts (2)

72-72: LGTM! Good use of optional chaining.

The change from if (id && id.endsWith("-modal")) to if (id?.endsWith("-modal")) is a good improvement. Using optional chaining (?.) is a safer approach as it handles cases where id might be undefined or null more gracefully, reducing the risk of runtime errors.


26-26: LGTM! Please provide documentation for the Lookers type.

The change from AbstractLooker<BaseState> | null to Lookers | null looks good and aligns with the import changes. This suggests a more specific type for the modalLooker state.

Could you please provide documentation for the Lookers type? This will help maintain clarity about what this type represents. You can run the following command to check if the Lookers type is documented:

app/packages/state/src/hooks/useCreateLooker.ts (1)

12-12: Improved type import for better code organization

The change to import BaseState and ImaVidConfig as types is a good practice in TypeScript. It clearly separates runtime dependencies from type-only imports, which can lead to better code organization and potentially smaller bundle sizes after compilation.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-364: Overall assessment: Well-structured component with room for minor improvements

The ImaVidLookerReact component is well-implemented and follows many React and TypeScript best practices. The recent changes have improved code organization and simplified some logic. To further enhance the code:

  1. Consider decomposing the component into smaller, more focused parts.
  2. Improve TypeScript usage for better type safety.
  3. Add more inline documentation for complex logic.
  4. Group related imports for better readability.

These suggestions will help maintain the code's quality as it evolves and make it easier for other developers to understand and work with the component.

app/packages/looker/src/state.ts (2)

462-462: LGTM!

The addition of shouldHandleKeyEvents: true to DEFAULT_BASE_OPTIONS is appropriate. It ensures that the default behavior remains unchanged (handling key events), while still allowing for this behavior to be overridden when needed.

This change aligns well with the addition of the shouldHandleKeyEvents property to the BaseOptions interface and maintains consistency in the codebase.


222-222: Approve with a compatibility concern.

The addition of enableTimeline: boolean to the VideoConfig interface is a good feature that allows control over timeline visibility in video configurations.

However, as this is a required property, it may break existing code that doesn't provide this value. Consider the following options:

  1. Make it optional (enableTimeline?: boolean) to maintain backward compatibility.
  2. If it must be required, ensure all existing VideoConfig usages are updated accordingly.

To verify the impact, please run the following script:

This will help identify areas that might need attention due to this change.

fiftyone/server/metadata.py (2)

27-27: LGTM: Import statement for RrdFile

The import statement for RrdFile from fiftyone.utils.rerun is correctly added. This import is necessary for the subsequent usage in _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS.


37-37: LGTM: Addition of RrdFile to _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS

The addition of RrdFile: "filepath" to _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS is correct and consistent with other entries. This change extends the metadata handling capabilities to include RrdFile.

To ensure this change is properly integrated, please verify its usage with the following script:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: RrdFile Addition to _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS

The addition of RrdFile: "filepath" to _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS has been successfully integrated and utilized across the codebase without any issues.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of RrdFile in metadata handling

# Search for usages of _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS
echo "Searching for usages of _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS:"
rg "_ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS" --type python

# Search for usages of RrdFile
echo "\nSearching for usages of RrdFile:"
rg "RrdFile" --type python

# Search for functions that might need updating due to this change
echo "\nSearching for potential functions that might need updating:"
rg "def get_metadata|def read_metadata|def _create_media_urls|def _get_additional_media_fields" --type python

Length of output: 596


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of RrdFile in metadata handling without relying on --type python

# Find all Python files and search for _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS
echo "Searching for usages of _ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS in Python files:"
fd --extension py --type f | xargs rg "_ADDITIONAL_MEDIA_FIELDS"

# Find all Python files and search for RrdFile
echo "\nSearching for usages of RrdFile in Python files:"
fd --extension py --type f | xargs rg "RrdFile"

# Find all Python files and search for specific function definitions that might need updating
echo "\nSearching for potential functions that might need updating in Python files:"
fd --extension py --type f | xargs rg "def (get_metadata|read_metadata|_create_media_urls|_get_additional_media_fields)"

Length of output: 1529

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/VideoLooker.tsx (3)

13-15: Clarify the usage of sample prop and sample from useLooker

It appears that sample is being passed as a prop and also retrieved from useLooker. Please verify whether passing sample as a prop is necessary if it can be obtained from useLooker, or if there's a redundancy.

Also applies to: 19-19


76-77: Verify event handler attachment with fos.useEventHandler

Ensure that using fos.useEventHandler to attach pause and play event handlers to looker is correct and aligns with the intended use of the API.


28-28: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify parameters passed to getFrameNumber

You're passing duration as both the currentTime and duration parameters in getFrameNumber(duration, duration, frameRate). Please verify if this is intentional. If the goal is to calculate the total number of frames, ensure that the parameters align with the function's expected inputs.

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ModalLooker.tsx (3)

30-60: Implementation of ModalLookerNoTimeline is correct

The ModalLookerNoTimeline component is properly implemented. It correctly utilizes the useLooker hook and manages state with useEffect. The props and Recoil states are used appropriately, and the component follows React and Recoil best practices.


80-80: Verify conditional rendering logic for potential overlap

The conditional rendering checks for shouldRenderImavid and video to determine which component to render. Please ensure that there are no scenarios where both shouldRenderImavid and video could be true simultaneously, which might lead to unintended component rendering or unexpected behavior.

Consider reviewing the conditions or adding safeguards to handle cases where both conditions might be true.

Also applies to: 86-89


27-27: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure all usages of LookerProps provide the required sample property

The sample property in LookerProps has been changed from optional to required. Please make sure that all components and functions using LookerProps are updated to provide the sample property to prevent potential type errors or runtime issues.

Run the following script to find all usages of LookerProps and check if the sample prop is provided:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: All usages of LookerProps provide the required sample property.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all components or functions using `LookerProps` and verify they include the 'sample' prop.

# Search for all TypeScript files that reference 'LookerProps'
rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' --type typescript 'LookerProps' -l | xargs -I {} sh -c '
  echo "Checking {}"
  # Check if "sample" is provided in the props or used within the component
  if ! rg "sample" {}; then
    echo "Warning: 'sample' prop may be missing in {}"
  fi
'

Length of output: 614

app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-looker.ts (5)

43-48: Confirm event handlers are properly cleaned up

When using fos.useEventHandler to attach event handlers, it's important to ensure that these handlers are correctly removed when the component unmounts or when dependencies change to prevent memory leaks or unintended behaviors. Verify that fos.useEventHandler handles cleanup internally.

You might want to check similar usages or documentation to confirm this.


104-104: Ensure all necessary dependencies are passed to useKeyEvents

When invoking useKeyEvents, confirm that all required dependencies are provided. Specifically, verify that initialRef, sample.sample._id, and looker are sufficient for the hook to function correctly without missing any necessary context.


13-107: Good use of custom hook and state management

The useLooker hook is well-structured, effectively managing state, refs, and side effects. It demonstrates good practices in custom hook creation, event handling, and integration with external libraries like Recoil and React Error Boundary.


1-12: Imports are organized and follow conventions

The import statements are correctly organized, importing necessary modules and hooks from React, Recoil, and other local modules. This aligns with the project's coding guidelines for import organization.


76-78: Verify cleanup logic in useEffect

The cleanup function in this useEffect depends on looker. This means that whenever the looker instance changes, the previous instance will be destroyed. Ensure that this behavior is intentional and that re-creating and destroying looker instances as dependencies change won't lead to performance issues or unintended side effects.

To confirm that this is the desired behavior, you can run the following script to check how often looker is re-created:

app/packages/utilities/src/schema.test.ts (6)

22-22: Update Reflects Correct Field Naming and Paths

The changes to the name and path properties in the embedded schema correctly reflect the structure of the embedded fields. This improves clarity and consistency within the schema definition.

Also applies to: 33-33


45-45: Consistent Naming and Path Updates for Embedded Fields with Database Fields

The updates to the name and path properties for embeddedWithDbFields and its nested field sample_id maintain consistency in the schema, especially where database fields (dbField) are involved. This ensures that the schema accurately represents the underlying data structure.

Also applies to: 57-57


92-92: Ensure Non-Null Assertion on fields is Safe

The use of the non-null assertion operator ! on SCHEMA.embedded.fields assumes that fields is always defined. Verify that fields is indeed always present to prevent potential runtime errors due to undefined values.


113-144: New Test Suite Enhances Coverage for getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType

The addition of the describe block for getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType significantly enhances test coverage. The tests effectively verify:

  • Retrieval of fields with a specific embeddedDocType at the top level.
  • Retrieval of fields with a specific embeddedDocType within nested fields.
  • Correct handling when the specified embeddedDocType does not exist.
  • Behavior with an empty schema.

These tests improve confidence in the function's correctness across various scenarios.


146-176: Comprehensive Tests Added for doesSchemaContainEmbeddedDocType

The new test cases for doesSchemaContainEmbeddedDocType thoroughly validate the function's behavior by checking:

  • Detection of embeddedDocType at the top level.
  • Detection of embeddedDocType within nested fields.
  • Correct response when the embeddedDocType does not exist.
  • Functionality with an empty schema.

This comprehensive testing ensures that any changes to the schema will be accurately reflected in the presence checks for embedded document types.


92-92: Verification of fields Presence in Schema

To ensure that the non-null assertion on fields does not cause runtime errors, you can verify the presence of fields in the schema definitions.

Run the following script to check for any schema entries where fields might be undefined:

Ensure that schema.json contains your schema object for this test. If the script returns no results, it confirms that all schema entries have fields defined.

app/packages/looker/src/lookers/video.ts (2)

23-25: Imports added appropriately

The added imports of setFrameNumberAtom and getDefaultStore are necessary for the new timeline and state management functionality.


530-535: Timeline state synchronization implemented correctly

The code correctly updates the frame number atom when the timeline feature is enabled, ensuring synchronization between the video looker's frame number and the global state.

Comment on lines +1 to +7
export function shortcutToHelpItems(SHORTCUTS) {
const result = {};
for (const k of SHORTCUTS) {
result[SHORTCUTS[k].shortcut] = SHORTCUTS[k];
}
return Object.values(result);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure changes to shortcutToHelpItems are reflected in all usages

The function shortcutToHelpItems is used in the following files:

  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/utils.ts
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/use-looker.ts
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Modal/ImaVidLooker.tsx

Please make sure that any modifications to shortcutToHelpItems are compatible with these implementations to prevent introducing issues.

🔗 Analysis chain

Improve type safety and function implementation

The function shortcutToHelpItems has several areas for improvement:

  1. Add type annotations to enhance type safety.
  2. Clarify the expected structure of the SHORTCUTS parameter.
  3. Use a more descriptive function name.
  4. Build the result as an array directly for better performance.
  5. Use lowercase for the parameter name as it's not a constant.

Here's a suggested implementation with these improvements:

interface ShortcutItem {
  shortcut: string;
  [key: string]: any;
}

export function getUniqueShortcutItems(shortcuts: Record<string, ShortcutItem>): ShortcutItem[] {
  const uniqueShortcuts = new Map<string, ShortcutItem>();
  
  for (const item of Object.values(shortcuts)) {
    if (item.shortcut) {
      uniqueShortcuts.set(item.shortcut, item);
    }
  }
  
  return Array.from(uniqueShortcuts.values());
}

This implementation:

  • Uses TypeScript interfaces for better type checking.
  • Clarifies that shortcuts is an object with string keys and ShortcutItem values.
  • Renames the function to getUniqueShortcutItems for clarity.
  • Uses a Map to store unique shortcuts, which is more idiomatic and efficient.
  • Builds and returns the array in one step, avoiding the need for Object.values at the end.
  • Checks if item.shortcut exists before using it, preventing potential undefined behavior.

To ensure this change doesn't break existing usage, please run the following command to check current usage of the function:

If there are any usages, make sure to update them accordingly.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

rg --type typescript "shortcutToHelpItems"

Length of output: 77


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Searching for the usage of `shortcutToHelpItems` in TypeScript files
rg --type ts "shortcutToHelpItems"

Length of output: 571

@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ export const getStandardizedUrls = (
urls:
| readonly { readonly field: string; readonly url: string }[]
| { [field: string]: string }
| ModalSample["urls"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Implementation does not handle new ModalSample["urls"] type

The getStandardizedUrls function signature now accepts ModalSample["urls"] as a possible type, but the function body lacks the necessary handling for this type. Ensure that the function correctly processes ModalSample["urls"] to maintain type safety and functionality.

  • File: app/packages/state/src/utils.ts
    • Function: getStandardizedUrls
🔗 Analysis chain

Function signature updated correctly, verify implementation

The addition of ModalSample["urls"] as a possible type for the urls parameter enhances the function's flexibility. This change is consistent with the updated import statement.

Please verify that the function body can handle the new ModalSample["urls"] type correctly. Run the following script to check the implementation:

If the function body doesn't handle the new type explicitly, consider adding appropriate type checks or assertions to ensure type safety.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of getStandardizedUrls function

# Test: Check if the function handles ModalSample["urls"] type
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function getStandardizedUrls($_) {
  $$$
  if (!Array.isArray(urls)) {
    return urls;
  }
  $$$
}'

# Test: Check if there are any type assertions or checks for ModalSample["urls"]
rg --type typescript 'ModalSample\["urls"\]' app/packages/state/src/utils.ts

Length of output: 254


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of getStandardizedUrls function

# Test: Check if the function handles ModalSample["urls"] type
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function getStandardizedUrls($_) {
  $$$
  if (!Array.isArray(urls)) {
    return urls;
  }
  $$$
}'

# Test: Check if there are any type assertions or checks for ModalSample["urls"]
rg 'ModalSample\["urls"\]' app/packages/state/src/utils.ts

Length of output: 227


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Further verify the implementation of getStandardizedUrls function with ModalSample["urls"]

# Test: Broaden ast-grep pattern to capture any handling of ModalSample["urls"]
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function getStandardizedUrls($_) {
  $$$
  if (!Array.isArray(urls)) {
    return urls;
  }
  $$$
}'

# Test: Search for any handling of ModalSample["urls"] within the function
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'getStandardizedUrls($_) {
  $$$
  if (urls instanceof ModalSample["urls"]) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Test: Find any utility functions or type assertions related to ModalSample["urls"]
rg 'ModalSample\["urls"\]' app/packages/state/src/utils.ts

Length of output: 884

shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
});
}
}, [hoveredId, id, looker, ref]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize Dependency Array in useEffect

The ref object in the dependency array doesn't trigger updates when its current value changes because the object reference remains the same. If you intend to react to changes in ref.current, you should adjust your approach.

Consider using a state or a derived value to trigger updates when ref.current changes, or, if ref doesn't change, you can remove it from the dependency array:

 useEffect(() => {
   // existing code
-}, [hoveredId, id, looker, ref]);
+}, [hoveredId, id, looker]);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
}, [hoveredId, id, looker, ref]);
}, [hoveredId, id, looker]);

Comment on lines +22 to +39
useEffect(() => {
if (ref.current) {
// initial call should wait for load event
const update = () => {
looker.updateOptions({
shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
});
ready.current = true;

looker.removeEventListener("load", update);
};
looker.addEventListener("load", update);
} else if (ready.current) {
looker.updateOptions({
shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
});
}
}, [hoveredId, id, looker, ref]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add Cleanup Function in useEffect to Prevent Memory Leaks

When adding event listeners within a useEffect, it's important to clean them up to prevent memory leaks. Currently, if the component unmounts before the 'load' event fires, the event listener may not be removed.

Refactor the useEffect hook to include a cleanup function:

 export default function useKeyEvents(
   ref: MutableRefObject<boolean>,
   id: string,
   looker: Lookers
 ) {
   const hoveredId = useRecoilValue(hoveredSampleId);
   const ready = useRef(false);

   useEffect(() => {
+    const update = () => {
+      looker.updateOptions({
+        shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
+      });
+      ready.current = true;
+      looker.removeEventListener("load", update);
+    };

     if (ref.current) {
       // initial call should wait for load event
-      const update = () => {
-        looker.updateOptions({
-          shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
-        });
-        ready.current = true;
-        looker.removeEventListener("load", update);
-      };
       looker.addEventListener("load", update);
     } else if (ready.current) {
       looker.updateOptions({
         shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
       });
     }

+    return () => {
+      looker.removeEventListener("load", update);
+    };
   }, [hoveredId, id, looker, ref]);
 }

This ensures the event listener is removed when the component unmounts, even if the 'load' event hasn't fired yet.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
useEffect(() => {
if (ref.current) {
// initial call should wait for load event
const update = () => {
looker.updateOptions({
shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
});
ready.current = true;
looker.removeEventListener("load", update);
};
looker.addEventListener("load", update);
} else if (ready.current) {
looker.updateOptions({
shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
});
}
}, [hoveredId, id, looker, ref]);
useEffect(() => {
const update = () => {
looker.updateOptions({
shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
});
ready.current = true;
looker.removeEventListener("load", update);
};
if (ref.current) {
// initial call should wait for load event
looker.addEventListener("load", update);
} else if (ready.current) {
looker.updateOptions({
shouldHandleKeyEvents: id === hoveredId,
});
}
return () => {
looker.removeEventListener("load", update);
};
}, [hoveredId, id, looker, ref]);

Comment on lines +21 to +23
const frameRate = useMemo(() => {
return sample.frameRate;
}, [sample]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider removing unnecessary useMemo for frameRate

Using useMemo to memoize a simple scalar value like sample.frameRate is unnecessary and adds complexity without performance benefits. You can directly assign the value to frameRate.

Apply this diff to simplify the code:

-const frameRate = useMemo(() => {
-  return sample.frameRate;
-}, [sample]);
+const frameRate = sample.frameRate;

Ensure to update the dependencies in the useEffect hook accordingly.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const frameRate = useMemo(() => {
return sample.frameRate;
}, [sample]);
const frameRate = sample.frameRate;

Comment on lines +32 to +39
const looker = React.useMemo(() => {
/** start refreshers */
reset;
selectedMediaField;
/** end refreshers */

return createLooker.current(sample);
}, [createLooker, reset, sample, selectedMediaField]) as L;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Remove unnecessary expressions inside useMemo

The expressions reset; and selectedMediaField; within the useMemo function body do not have any operational effect. Including them may cause confusion for other developers reading the code. Since these variables are already in the dependency array and if they do not directly influence the computation inside useMemo, consider removing these expressions to clean up the code.

Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary expressions:

 const looker = React.useMemo(() => {
-    /** start refreshers */
-    reset;
-    selectedMediaField;
-    /** end refreshers */

     return createLooker.current(sample);
   }, [createLooker, reset, sample, selectedMediaField]) as L;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const looker = React.useMemo(() => {
/** start refreshers */
reset;
selectedMediaField;
/** end refreshers */
return createLooker.current(sample);
}, [createLooker, reset, sample, selectedMediaField]) as L;
const looker = React.useMemo(() => {
return createLooker.current(sample);
}, [createLooker, reset, sample, selectedMediaField]) as L;

Comment on lines +54 to +61
useEffect(() => {
/** start refreshers */
colorScheme;
/** end refreshers */

!initialRef.current && looker.updateSample(sample);
}, [colorScheme, looker, sample]);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Eliminate redundant expression in useEffect

The standalone expression colorScheme; within this useEffect doesn't perform any action and might be misleading. Since colorScheme is already included in the dependency array, and if it's not used inside the effect, you can safely remove this expression to improve code clarity.

Apply this diff to improve the code:

 useEffect(() => {
-    /** start refreshers */
-    colorScheme;
-    /** end refreshers */

     !initialRef.current && looker.updateSample(sample);
   }, [colorScheme, looker, sample]);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
useEffect(() => {
/** start refreshers */
colorScheme;
/** end refreshers */
!initialRef.current && looker.updateSample(sample);
}, [colorScheme, looker, sample]);
useEffect(() => {
!initialRef.current && looker.updateSample(sample);
}, [colorScheme, looker, sample]);

Comment on lines +18 to +30
const [id] = useState(() => uuid());
const initialRef = useRef<boolean>(true);
const ref = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null);
const [reset, setReset] = useState(false);
const lookerOptions = fos.useLookerOptions(true);
const createLooker = fos.useCreateLooker(
true,
false,
lookerOptions,
undefined,
true
);
const selectedMediaField = useRecoilValue(fos.selectedMediaField(true));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Memoize createLooker to prevent unnecessary re-creations

The createLooker function might be redefined on every render if fos.useCreateLooker does not memoize its result. This can lead to unnecessary re-creation of the looker instance. Consider memoizing createLooker to ensure that it remains stable across renders unless its dependencies change.

You can memoize createLooker like this:

 const createLooker = React.useMemo(() => fos.useCreateLooker(
   true,
   false,
   lookerOptions,
   undefined,
   true
- ), []);
+ ), [lookerOptions]);

Ensure that fos.useCreateLooker is suitable for memoization in this manner.

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Comment on lines +116 to +161
schema.getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType(
SCHEMA,
"fiftyone.core.labels.TopLabel"
)
).toEqual([SCHEMA.top]);
});

it("should get all fields with embeddedDocType in nested fields", () => {
expect(
schema.getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType(
SCHEMA,
"fiftyone.core.labels.EmbeddedLabel"
)
).toEqual([
SCHEMA.embedded.fields!.field,
SCHEMA.embeddedWithDbFields.fields!.sample_id,
]);
});

it("should return empty array if embeddedDocType does not exist", () => {
expect(
schema.getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType(SCHEMA, "nonexistentDocType")
).toEqual([]);
});

it("should return empty array for empty schema", () => {
expect(schema.getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType({}, "anyDocType")).toEqual([]);
});
});

describe("doesSchemaContainEmbeddedDocType", () => {
it("should return true if embeddedDocType exists at top level", () => {
expect(
schema.doesSchemaContainEmbeddedDocType(
SCHEMA,
"fiftyone.core.labels.TopLabel"
)
).toBe(true);
});

it("should return true if embeddedDocType exists in nested fields", () => {
expect(
schema.doesSchemaContainEmbeddedDocType(
SCHEMA,
"fiftyone.core.labels.EmbeddedLabel"
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider Using Constants for Embedded Document Type Strings

The embedded document type strings, such as "fiftyone.core.labels.TopLabel" and "fiftyone.core.labels.EmbeddedLabel", are repeated across multiple test cases. To enhance maintainability and reduce the potential for typos, consider defining these strings as constants or enumerations.

Example:

const TOP_LABEL = "fiftyone.core.labels.TopLabel";
const EMBEDDED_LABEL = "fiftyone.core.labels.EmbeddedLabel";

Then use them in your tests:

expect(
  schema.getFieldsWithEmbeddedDocType(SCHEMA, TOP_LABEL)
).toEqual([SCHEMA.top]);

Comment on lines +558 to +560
getVideo() {
return this.lookerElement.children[0].element as HTMLVideoElement;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add null checks to prevent potential runtime errors

The method getVideo() assumes that this.lookerElement.children[0] and this.lookerElement.children[0].element are always defined. If children is empty or element is undefined, this will cause a runtime error. Consider adding null checks to ensure these properties exist before accessing them.

Apply this diff to add null checks:

-getVideo() {
-  return this.lookerElement.children[0].element as HTMLVideoElement;
+getVideo() {
+  const child = this.lookerElement.children[0];
+  if (child && child.element) {
+    return child.element as HTMLVideoElement;
+  }
+  return null;
+}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
getVideo() {
return this.lookerElement.children[0].element as HTMLVideoElement;
}
getVideo() {
const child = this.lookerElement.children[0];
if (child && child.element) {
return child.element as HTMLVideoElement;
}
return null;
}

@sashankaryal sashankaryal self-requested a review October 4, 2024 23:51
Copy link
Contributor

@sashankaryal sashankaryal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@sashankaryal sashankaryal merged commit a2d26f0 into release/v1.0.1 Oct 4, 2024
13 checks passed
@sashankaryal sashankaryal deleted the cherry-picks branch October 4, 2024 23:52
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2024
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants