Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[doc][misc] clarify VLLM_HOST_IP for multi-node inference #12667

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

youkaichao
Copy link
Member

@youkaichao youkaichao commented Feb 3, 2025

As more and more people are trying deepseek models with multi-node inference, #7815 becomes more frequent. Let's give clear message to users.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@mergify mergify bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 3, 2025
@youkaichao
Copy link
Member Author

doc build is good. merge directly as we don't have tests for this.

@youkaichao youkaichao merged commit e643309 into vllm-project:main Feb 3, 2025
9 of 12 checks passed
@youkaichao youkaichao deleted the warn_host_ip branch February 3, 2025 01:32
youngkent pushed a commit to youngkent/vllm that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
…ct#12667)

As more and more people are trying deepseek models with multi-node
inference, vllm-project#7815 becomes more
frequent. Let's give clear message to users.

Signed-off-by: youkaichao <[email protected]>
srikanthsrnvs pushed a commit to srikanthsrnvs/vllm that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
…ct#12667)

As more and more people are trying deepseek models with multi-node
inference, vllm-project#7815 becomes more
frequent. Let's give clear message to users.

Signed-off-by: youkaichao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Srinivas <[email protected]>
sahelib25 pushed a commit to krai/vllm that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
…ct#12667)

As more and more people are trying deepseek models with multi-node
inference, vllm-project#7815 becomes more
frequent. Let's give clear message to users.

Signed-off-by: youkaichao <[email protected]>
fxmarty-amd pushed a commit to fxmarty-amd/vllm that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
…ct#12667)

As more and more people are trying deepseek models with multi-node
inference, vllm-project#7815 becomes more
frequent. Let's give clear message to users.

Signed-off-by: youkaichao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Marty <[email protected]>
ShangmingCai pushed a commit to ShangmingCai/vllm that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2025
…ct#12667)

As more and more people are trying deepseek models with multi-node
inference, vllm-project#7815 becomes more
frequent. Let's give clear message to users.

Signed-off-by: youkaichao <[email protected]>
GWS0428 pushed a commit to GWS0428/VARserve that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
…ct#12667)

As more and more people are trying deepseek models with multi-node
inference, vllm-project#7815 becomes more
frequent. Let's give clear message to users.

Signed-off-by: youkaichao <[email protected]>
panf2333 pushed a commit to yottalabsai/vllm that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
…ct#12667)

As more and more people are trying deepseek models with multi-node
inference, vllm-project#7815 becomes more
frequent. Let's give clear message to users.

Signed-off-by: youkaichao <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants