Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

True Delta-Based Itereation 1 #585

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

True Delta-Based Itereation 1 #585

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

h4uges
Copy link
Contributor

@h4uges h4uges commented Apr 20, 2023

The goal of this PR is to save Vitruv Models in a delta-based representation. In iteration 1 we save the complete delta from start to current status of the model, without any concept of checkpoints or similar concepts.

Not in this PR:

- make ModelInstance a Resource (with delta based (de)serialization)
- add new entry for ModelInstances in ResourceFactoryRegistry of models resource set
h4uges and others added 5 commits April 25, 2023 10:11
@h4uges h4uges marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2023 11:40
@h4uges h4uges requested a review from a team as a code owner May 5, 2023 11:40
@h4uges
Copy link
Contributor Author

h4uges commented May 8, 2023

@TomWerm please retrigger actions after vitruv-tools/Vitruv-Change#69 is merged.

TomWerm
TomWerm previously approved these changes May 8, 2023
static val LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(ModelInstance)
@Accessors(PUBLIC_GETTER)
Resource resource
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing the public getter for resource breaks the "Component-Based Systems Application Test Utilities" in the Vitruv-CaseStudies repository (see https://github.com/vitruv-tools/Vitruv-CaseStudies/blob/86958b26f9ad3708232a57e1fc29d2212dc7859b/bundles/tools.vitruv.applications.cbs.testutils/src/tools/vitruv/applications/cbs/testutils/equivalencetest/EquivalenceTestExecutable.xtend#L90), which is why the build fails.

- handle loading of aware of state based representations and pathmap-mechanism
- work in progress
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants