Solve I_S queries using CNF rewriting #7677
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: GuptaManan100 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <[email protected]>
|
@pontusmelke am I doing it right? ;) |
Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <[email protected]>
|
We could use this strategy in more situations - we could replan when we encounter Scatter queries, vtgate joins and probably some more. |
Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <[email protected]>
harshit-gangal
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2021
Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <[email protected]>
Still got it 💥 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
To handle I_S queries correctly, we need to be able to find the
table_schemaandtable_namepredicates in the WHERE clause. Sometimes, this is difficult because of how the query is written.What this PR does is to introduce a rewriter that is able to massage boolean logic into a simpler form. It normalises the predicates into a form that the planner is looking for, and this makes it possible for the planner to find more applicable rules.
CNF, short for conjuctive normal form, rewrites the predicates into
an AND of ORs, which is exactly what the planner is looking for.Related Issue(s)
Fixes: #7377
Checklist
NopeAddedNot neededImpacted Areas in Vitess
Components that this PR will affect: