Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport and fix tags for examples/operator #7358

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 23, 2021

Conversation

sougou
Copy link
Contributor

@sougou sougou commented Jan 23, 2021

Description

Backport and tag fix for #7357

Related Issue(s)

#7355

Checklist

  • Should this PR be backported?
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Impacted Areas in Vitess

Components that this PR will affect:

  • Query Serving
  • VReplication
  • Cluster Management
  • Build
  • VTAdmin

Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <[email protected]>
vtgate: vitess/lite:v8.0.0
vttablet: vitess/lite:v8.0.0
vtbackup: vitess/lite:v8.0.0
vtctld: vitess/lite:v9.0.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see what you did here. Given how close we are to the release I think this is fine.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea. Otherwise, we'd have to wait to merge the other PR.

@deepthi
Copy link
Member

deepthi commented Jan 23, 2021

@askdba you should merge this just before creating the 9.0 release.

@sougou sougou merged commit 635e65b into vitessio:release-9.0 Jan 23, 2021
@sougou sougou deleted the ss-v9-examples branch January 23, 2021 23:18
@askdba askdba added this to the v9.0 milestone Jan 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants