Minor cleanups of the JDBC code

[systay]

Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor [email protected]

---

This change is 

[systay]

@harshit-gangal if you have time to look this over, it would be much appreciated

[harshit-gangal]

Reviewed 1 of 12 files at r1.
Reviewable status: 1 of 12 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @systay and @sougou)

---

java/jdbc/src/main/java/io/vitess/jdbc/VitessConnection.java, line 486 at r1 (raw file):

Quoted 13 lines of code…

     * @throws SQLException
     */
    public boolean isClosed() throws SQLException {
        return this.closed;
    }
 
     *
     * @param name - Property Name
     * @return Property Value
     * @throws SQLException
     */
    public String getClientInfo(String name) throws SQLException {
        return null;

This is the signature of the method implemented from Connection interface.
As of now, they are not throwing SQLException. But, any reason for doing this?

---

java/jdbc/src/test/java/io/vitess/jdbc/ConnectionPropertiesTest.java, line 36 at r1 (raw file):

import static io.vitess.util.Constants.DEFAULT_INCLUDED_FIELDS;
import static io.vitess.util.Constants.DEFAULT_TABLET_TYPE;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;

explicitly import the classes.

[systay]

Reviewable status: 1 of 12 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @harshit-gangal, @systay, and @sougou)

---

java/jdbc/src/main/java/io/vitess/jdbc/VitessConnection.java, line 486 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, harshit-gangal wrote…

     * @throws SQLException
     */
    public boolean isClosed() throws SQLException {
        return this.closed;
    }
 
     *
     * @param name - Property Name
     * @return Property Value
     * @throws SQLException
     */
    public String getClientInfo(String name) throws SQLException {
        return null;

This is the signature of the method implemented from Connection interface.
As of now, they are not throwing SQLException. But, any reason for doing this?

When implementing interfaces, it's allowable to throw less than the interface declares, not more. I just feel like it's always is better to minimize the surface exposed when possible. If you want, I can keep the throws declarations as is instead.

[harshit-gangal]

Reviewable status: 1 of 12 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @systay and @sougou)

---

java/jdbc/src/main/java/io/vitess/jdbc/VitessConnection.java, line 486 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, systay (Andres Taylor) wrote…

When implementing interfaces, it's allowable to throw less than the interface declares, not more. I just feel like it's always is better to minimize the surface exposed when possible. If you want, I can keep the throws declarations as is instead.

I am good with removing exceptions from method signature which are not throwing those exceptions.

[harshit-gangal]

Reviewed 11 of 12 files at r1.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @systay and @sougou)

---

java/jdbc/src/test/java/io/vitess/jdbc/VitessConnectionTest.java, line 40 at r1 (raw file):

import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
 

explicitly import the classes / methods.

---

java/jdbc/src/test/java/io/vitess/jdbc/VitessStatementTest.java, line 48 at r1 (raw file):

import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import static org.mockito.Matchers.*;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;

explicitly import the classes / methods.

[sougou]

@mpawliszyn: please review.