Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update base images to bookworm #17539

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update base images to bookworm #17539

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+21 −17

Conversation

dbussink
Copy link
Contributor

Bullseye is already in the LTS phase, so we really should upgrade to bookworm here.

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

@dbussink
Update base images to bookworm
d35613f 
Bullseye is already in the LTS phase, so we really should upgrade to
bookworm here.

Signed-off-by: Dirkjan Bussink <[email protected]>
@vitess-bot vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Jan 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Jan 15, 2025
@frouioui frouioui mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2025
Open
5 tasks
L3o-pold
L3o-pold reviewed Jan 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
docker/bootstrap/Dockerfile.common
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FROM --platform=linux/amd64 golang:1.23.4-bullseye
FROM --platform=linux/amd64 golang:1.23.4-bookworm

# Install Vitess build dependencies
RUN apt-get update && DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

etcd package do not longer exists in bookworm if I am not mistaken. Should be replaced with etcd-client and etcd-server

@dbussink
Copy link
Contributor Author

This depends on #17552 as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@L3o-pold L3o-pold L3o-pold left review comments

@deepthi deepthi Awaiting requested review from deepthi deepthi is a code owner

@derekperkins derekperkins Awaiting requested review from derekperkins derekperkins is a code owner

@mattlord mattlord Awaiting requested review from mattlord mattlord is a code owner

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 Awaiting requested review from GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 is a code owner

@frouioui frouioui Awaiting requested review from frouioui frouioui is a code owner

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v22.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@dbussink @L3o-pold