Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XCM specific configuration. #242

Closed
darkforest0202 opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

XCM specific configuration. #242

darkforest0202 opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority:high

Comments

@darkforest0202
Copy link
Contributor

The following XCM configuration is needed for Kreivo and Virto parachains:

  • For the native token (DOT/KSM) the relay chain should be recognized as a reserve (not asset hubs).
  • For other fungible assets, Asset Hubs parachains should be the reserve.
@darkforest0202 darkforest0202 added enhancement New feature or request priority:high labels Jun 2, 2023
@darkforest0202 darkforest0202 added this to the Rococo Deploy milestone Jun 2, 2023
@darkforest0202 darkforest0202 moved this to Backlog in Virto MVP Jun 2, 2023
@darkforest0202 darkforest0202 moved this from Backlog to Ready in Virto MVP Jun 2, 2023
@darkforest0202 darkforest0202 moved this from Ready to In Progress in Virto MVP Jun 7, 2023
@olanod
Copy link
Member

olanod commented Jun 7, 2023

Adding to point 2, should we add the remote account conversion that was added recently so users in our parachain can act on the assets hub with their own accounts instead of every asset being locked in the parachain's sovereign account?

@darkforest0202
Copy link
Contributor Author

Depends on #254

@darkforest0202
Copy link
Contributor Author

Facing an error at the moment when reserve transferring an asset from statemine to kreivo:

ERROR: UntrustedReserveLocation

Investigation is on going.

@darkforest0202 darkforest0202 moved this from In Progress to Under Review in Virto MVP Jun 15, 2023
@darkforest0202
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adding to point 2, should we add the remote account conversion that was added recently so users in our parachain can act on the assets hub with their own accounts instead of every asset being locked in the parachain's sovereign account?

#260

@darkforest0202 darkforest0202 moved this from Under Review to Done in Virto MVP Jun 21, 2023
@olanod olanod closed this as completed Apr 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority:high
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants