Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving the Import of Termination Axioms #548

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 13, 2022

Conversation

ArquintL
Copy link
Member

@ArquintL ArquintL commented Oct 12, 2022

This PR optimizes the import of axioms for termination measures to only import those that are actually needed based on the type of termination measure tuples.

Furthermore, this PR sorts the Viper members reported by GeneratedViperMessage

…port and emits the Viper encoding before applying Viper-to-Viper transformations
@ArquintL ArquintL requested a review from jcp19 October 12, 2022 15:10
…per transformations because termination measures are printed in invalid syntax
Copy link
Contributor

@jcp19 jcp19 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ArquintL
Copy link
Member Author

bors merge

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2022
548: Improving the Import of Termination Axioms r=ArquintL a=ArquintL

This PR optimizes the import of axioms for termination measures to only import those that are actually needed based on the type of termination measure tuples.

Furthermore, this PR sorts the Viper members reported by `GeneratedViperMessage`

Co-authored-by: Linard Arquint <[email protected]>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Oct 13, 2022

Build failed:

@ArquintL
Copy link
Member Author

bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Oct 13, 2022

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit 05578cb into master Oct 13, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the selectively-importing-termination-axioms branch October 13, 2022 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants