Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove explicit thread destruction code in the libasync driver. #1837

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2017

Conversation

s-ludwig
Copy link
Member

See the discussion in #1835. Libasync now uses the default thread pool of std.parallelism, which is shut down automatically.

See the discussion in #1835. Libasync now uses the default thread pool of std.parallelism, which is shut down automatically.
@dlang-bot dlang-bot merged commit e79c871 into master Jul 13, 2017
@wilzbach
Copy link
Member

Wow that was a quick resolution - could you maybe release a new tag, s.t. these changes are propagated to the Project-Tester? Thanks!

@s-ludwig
Copy link
Member Author

Let's wait with this until #1838 is merged, too.

@s-ludwig
Copy link
Member Author

0.8.1-alpha.1 is now tagged and also available on code.dlang.org.

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member

0.8.1-alpha.1 is now tagged and also available on code.dlang.org.

Thanks a lot. I will try to keep an eye on the Project-Tester to check whether this solved our problems.

@s-ludwig s-ludwig deleted the remove_libasync_destroy_threads branch July 16, 2017 13:53
s-ludwig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2017
…y_threads

Remove explicit thread destruction code in the libasync driver.
merged-on-behalf-of: Sönke Ludwig <[email protected]>
Conflicts:
	source/vibe/core/drivers/libasync.d
s-ludwig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2017
…y_threads

Remove explicit thread destruction code in the libasync driver.
merged-on-behalf-of: Sönke Ludwig <[email protected]>
Conflicts:
	source/vibe/core/drivers/libasync.d
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants