Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: stronger security level for JWT verification with RSA keys #21

Merged

Conversation

aversini
Copy link
Collaborator

@aversini aversini commented Jun 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced authentication processes with new utilities for token verification and user authentication.
  • Refactor

    • Refactored local storage key usage with a new constant for easier management.
    • Improved token verification and user ID setting based on JWT payload extraction.
  • Performance

    • Increased the bundle size limit for better handling of new authentication features.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes primarily enhance the authentication module in the auth-provider package by increasing the bundle size limit, adding new constants, introducing token verification and extraction functions, and updating the AuthState type to include additional fields. These adjustments allow for more secure and efficient handling of JWT tokens and user authentication.

Changes

File Path Summary
packages/auth-provider/bundlesize.config.js Increased the size limit for dist/index.js from 4 kb to 9 kb.
packages/auth-provider/src/common/constants.ts Added new constants: LOCAL_STORAGE_PREFIX, JWT_PUBLIC_KEY, and LOGOUT_SESSION.
packages/auth-provider/src/common/types.d.ts Modified AuthState to include idToken, userId, and logoutReason. Updated AuthContextProps.
packages/auth-provider/src/common/utilities.ts Added imports for token verification (JWT, jose, JWT_PUBLIC_KEY). Introduced verifyAndExtractToken and authenticateUser functions.
packages/auth-provider/src/components/.../AuthProvider.tsx Added/modified imports for JWT handling. Refactored usage of local storage keys and enhanced token verification and user ID setting.

Sequence Diagrams

Token Verification and Authentication

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant AuthProvider
    participant Utilities

    User->>AuthProvider: Login/Verify Request
    AuthProvider->>Utilities: Call verifyAndExtractToken
    Utilities->>Utilities: Verify JWT using jose
    Utilities-->>AuthProvider: Return token payload
    AuthProvider->>AuthProvider: Extract userId from token
    AuthProvider-->>User: Successful Login/Verification Response
Loading

Local Storage Key Refactoring

sequenceDiagram
    participant AuthProvider
    participant LocalStorage

    AuthProvider->>LocalStorage: Set item using LOCAL_STORAGE_PREFIX
    LocalStorage-->>AuthProvider: Acknowledge Setting Key
    AuthProvider->>LocalStorage: Get item using LOCAL_STORAGE_PREFIX
    LocalStorage-->>AuthProvider: Return Stored Item
Loading

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a135015 and a1a13b4.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/auth-provider/bundlesize.config.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/auth-provider/src/common/constants.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/auth-provider/src/common/types.d.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/auth-provider/src/common/utilities.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/auth-provider/src/components/AuthProvider/AuthProvider.tsx (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/auth-provider/bundlesize.config.js
Additional comments not posted (5)
packages/auth-provider/src/common/types.d.ts (2)

12-18: Addition of optional fields in AuthState is appropriate.

The new fields idToken, userId, and logoutReason enhance the authentication state management, aligning with the PR's objectives to strengthen security measures.


21-24: Enhanced clarity and integration in AuthContextProps.

Extending AuthState and specifying parameters for login function improves the API's clarity and usability.

packages/auth-provider/src/common/constants.ts (2)

12-12: Good addition of LOCAL_STORAGE_PREFIX.

The use of a specific prefix for local storage keys enhances namespace management and reduces potential key collisions.


14-22: Secure and practical storage of JWT_PUBLIC_KEY.

Storing the JWT public key as a constant facilitates secure and efficient token verification processes.

packages/auth-provider/src/components/AuthProvider/AuthProvider.tsx (1)

Line range hint 18-63: Consistent use of LOCAL_STORAGE_PREFIX and centralized token verification logic.

The refactoring to use LOCAL_STORAGE_PREFIX for key naming and centralizing the token verification logic in verifyAndExtractToken enhances maintainability and consistency across the component.

Copy link

Bundle Size

Status File Size (Gzip) Limits
index.js 7.88 KB (+4.56 KB +137.08%) 9 kb

Overall bundle size: 7.88 KB (+4.56 KB +137.08%)
Overall status: ✅

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/auth-provider/src/common/utilities.ts (1)

Line range hint 5-43: Consider re-throwing errors after logging in serviceCall.

The function logs errors but does not re-throw them. This might suppress error handling in the calling context, which could lead to hidden bugs especially in production environments.

- console.error(_error);
+ console.error(_error);
+ throw _error;
Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1a13b4 and fc4a327.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (5)
  • examples/implicit-flow/src/main.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/auth-provider/package.json (2 hunks)
  • packages/auth-provider/src/common/constants.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/auth-provider/src/common/utilities.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/auth-provider/src/components/AuthProvider/AuthProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • examples/implicit-flow/src/main.tsx
  • packages/auth-provider/package.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/auth-provider/src/common/constants.ts
Additional comments not posted (1)
packages/auth-provider/src/common/utilities.ts (1)

48-59: Well-implemented token verification function.

The verifyAndExtractToken function uses the jose library effectively for JWT verification. Consider adding specific error logging for better traceability in production environments.

- console.error(_error);
+ console.error("JWT verification failed:", _error);

@aversini aversini merged commit 0750b75 into main Jun 24, 2024
4 checks passed
@aversini aversini deleted the feat-stronger-security-level-for-JWT-verification-with-RSA-keys branch June 24, 2024 18:42
@aversini aversini mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant