Incorrect docker configuration #44804
Comments
|
Using the standalone mode with experimental preCompiledNextServer: true will also reintroduce old bug: #32513 With the same error: Error: Cannot find module ‘./image-optimizer’ |
|
The bug you have mentioned is not related to missing "sharp" binaries. |
styfle
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 6, 2024
…ep (#61696) ## History Previously, we added support for `squoosh` because it was a wasm implementation that "just worked" on all platforms when running `next dev` for the first time. However, it was slow so we always recommended manually installing `sharp` for production use cases running `next build` and `next start`. Now that [`sharp` supports webassembly](https://sharp.pixelplumbing.com/install#webassembly), we no longer need to maintain `squoosh`, so it can be removed. We also don't need to make the user install sharp manually because it can be installed under `optionalDependencies`. I left it optional in case there was some platform that still needed to manually install the wasm variant with `npm install --cpu=wasm32 sharp` such as codesandbox/stackblitz (I don't believe sharp has any fallback built in yet). Since we can guarantee `sharp`, we can also remove `get-orientation` dep and upgrade `image-size` dep. I also moved an [existing `sharp` test](#56674) into its own fixture since it was unrelated to image optimization. ## Related Issues - Fixes #41417 - Closes #54670 - Related #54708 - Related #44804 - Related #48820
styfle
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 25, 2024
…ependency (#63321) ## History Previously, we added support for `squoosh` because it was a wasm implementation that "just worked" on all platforms when running `next dev` for the first time. However, it was slow so we always recommended manually installing `sharp` for production use cases running `next build` and `next start`. Now that [`sharp` supports webassembly](https://sharp.pixelplumbing.com/install#webassembly), we no longer need to maintain `squoosh`, so it can be removed. We also don't need to make the user install sharp manually because it can be installed under `optionalDependencies`. I left it optional in case there was some platform that still needed to manually install the wasm variant with `npm install --cpu=wasm32 sharp` such as codesandbox/stackblitz (I don't believe sharp has any fallback built in yet). Since we can guarantee `sharp`, we can also remove `get-orientation` dep and upgrade `image-size` dep. I also moved an [existing `sharp` test](#56674) into its own fixture since it was unrelated to image optimization. ## Related Issues - Fixes #41417 - Related #54670 - Related #54708 - Related #44804 - Related #48820 - Related #61810 - Related #61696 - Related #44685 - Closes #64362 ## Breaking Change This is a breaking change because newer versions of `sharp` no longer support `yarn@1`. - lovell/sharp#3750 The workaround is to install with `yarn --ignore-engines` flag. Also note that Vercel no longer defaults to yarn when no lockfile is found - vercel/vercel#11131 - vercel/vercel#11242 Closes NEXT-2823
ForsakenHarmony
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2024
…ependency (#63321) ## History Previously, we added support for `squoosh` because it was a wasm implementation that "just worked" on all platforms when running `next dev` for the first time. However, it was slow so we always recommended manually installing `sharp` for production use cases running `next build` and `next start`. Now that [`sharp` supports webassembly](https://sharp.pixelplumbing.com/install#webassembly), we no longer need to maintain `squoosh`, so it can be removed. We also don't need to make the user install sharp manually because it can be installed under `optionalDependencies`. I left it optional in case there was some platform that still needed to manually install the wasm variant with `npm install --cpu=wasm32 sharp` such as codesandbox/stackblitz (I don't believe sharp has any fallback built in yet). Since we can guarantee `sharp`, we can also remove `get-orientation` dep and upgrade `image-size` dep. I also moved an [existing `sharp` test](#56674) into its own fixture since it was unrelated to image optimization. ## Related Issues - Fixes #41417 - Related #54670 - Related #54708 - Related #44804 - Related #48820 - Related #61810 - Related #61696 - Related #44685 - Closes #64362 ## Breaking Change This is a breaking change because newer versions of `sharp` no longer support `yarn@1`. - lovell/sharp#3750 The workaround is to install with `yarn --ignore-engines` flag. Also note that Vercel no longer defaults to yarn when no lockfile is found - vercel/vercel#11131 - vercel/vercel#11242 Closes NEXT-2823
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to two years of inactivity. It will be closed in 7 days unless there’s further input. If you believe this issue is still relevant, please leave a comment or provide updated details. Thank you. |
|
This issue has been automatically closed due to two years of inactivity. If you’re still experiencing a similar problem or have additional details to share, please open a new issue following our current issue template. Your updated report helps us investigate and address concerns more efficiently. Thank you for your understanding! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Verify canary release
Provide environment information
P.s. Dockerfile in the example hasn't change in the canary
Which example does this report relate to?
with-docker
What browser are you using? (if relevant)
No response
How are you deploying your application? (if relevant)
Self deployed via docker-compose
Describe the Bug
Error occurs during build in standalone mode:
The bug is caused by line 20 in Dockerfile https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/examples/with-docker/Dockerfile#L20-L21
First it copies node_modules from deps and then it overrides them by copying from local directory COPY . .
Expected Behavior
It should build without any errors.
There's how to fix it: #35296 (comment)
To Reproduce
See related discussion #35296
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: