fix: memory leak from warnOnce()
#47537
build_and_test.yml
on: pull_request
Determine changes
9s
build-next
/
build
1m 3s
optimize-ci
/
Graphite CI Optimizer
3s
build-native
/
build
27s
validate-docs-links
12s
Matrix: test unit
test cargo benches
/
Test
5m 2s
test next-swc wasi
/
build
test devlow package
/
build
Matrix: test prod
Matrix: test dev
Matrix: test integration
Matrix: Test new tests for flakes (dev)
Matrix: Test new tests for flakes (prod)
Matrix: test ppr dev
Matrix: test ppr prod
Matrix: test turbopack dev
Matrix: test turbopack development integration
Matrix: test turbopack production integration
Matrix: test turbopack production
Matrix: Run devlow benchmarks
Matrix: Test new tests when deployed
report test results to datadog
1m 32s
thank you, next
0s
Annotations
20 warnings and 10 notices
Determine changes
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
validate-docs-links
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
optimize-ci / Graphite CI Optimizer
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
ast-grep lint
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/diagnostics/mod.rs#L114
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/source_map/mod.rs#L61
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/source_map/mod.rs#L95
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/source_map/mod.rs#L96
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/reference/mod.rs#L37
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/reference/mod.rs#L52
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/reference/mod.rs#L90
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/reference/mod.rs#L129
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/proxied_asset.rs#L18
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
no-vc-struct:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/proxied_asset.rs#L19
Don't use a Vc directly in a struct
|
rustdoc check / build:
crates/napi/src/next_api/project.rs#L950
public documentation for `project_update_info_subscribe` links to private item `UpdateMessage::Start`
|
rustdoc check / build:
crates/napi/src/next_api/project.rs#L950
public documentation for `project_update_info_subscribe` links to private item `UpdateMessage::End`
|
rustdoc check / build:
crates/napi/src/next_api/project.rs#L950
public documentation for `project_update_info_subscribe` links to private item `UpdateMessage::End`
|
rustdoc check / build:
crates/napi/src/next_api/project.rs#L950
public documentation for `project_update_info_subscribe` links to private item `UpdateMessage::Start`
|
thank you, next
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
report test results to datadog
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/reference/mod.rs#L180
Calling `RawModule::new(*source).to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/reference/mod.rs#L195
Calling `module.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-dev-server/src/source/asset_graph.rs#L180
Calling `asset.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/resolve/mod.rs#L1062
Calling `FileSource::new(**path).to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/resolve/mod.rs#L1080
Calling `FileSource::new(**path).to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/resolve/mod.rs#L2262
Calling `Request::parse(Value::new(Pattern::Constant(request)))
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/rebase.rs#L55
Calling `RebasedAsset::new(*module, *self.input_dir, *self.output_dir)
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-css/src/chunk/mod.rs#L272
Calling `chunk_item_key.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbopack-css/src/chunk/mod.rs#L316
Calling `SingleItemCssChunk::new(*this.chunking_context, **item)
|
to-resolved-in-loop:
turbopack/crates/turbo-tasks-fs/src/embed/fs.rs#L52
Calling `path.join(entry_name.clone()).to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
Name | Size | |
---|---|---|
test-playwright-snapshots-test-dev-react--1-4
|
816 KB |
|
test-reports-test-dev-react--1-4
|
130 KB |
|
turbo-run-summary-test-dev-react--1-4
|
238 KB |
|