Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Abs features only #70

Open
wants to merge 80 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ilbarlow
Copy link

Tick box for when D/V sign is known, so default is unticked

luigiferiani and others added 30 commits June 13, 2018 13:57
…eful for Tierpsy in general, but I want it version controlled
…sing bitwise not and opencv to avoid type casting
…seful to test a synthetic, single file, as we found out
Sincing with 1.5.1-beta2 (working conda installation)
Merging upstream to my repo to get Avelino's new imporovements on NN BG subtractions
…paces, and a call to the debugger has been changed to put the value to nan when taking the moving average in /tierpsy/analysis/int_ske_orient/checkFinalOrientation.py if there are no valid skeletons. A file added, check_default_attrs.py, as a debugging script - it only reads the units conversions without changing them.
…nning in parralel and creating the same path at the same moment.
The feature sets tierpsy_8, tieprsy_16, tierpsy_256 and tierpsy_2k can be selected automatically from a drop down menu when feature_type=tierpsy.

The user can also select features based on keywords.
Syncing with Avelino's master
luigiferiani and others added 28 commits November 5, 2019 15:02
Implemented looking for wells on a grid via minimisation. Only works on square wells at the moment, falls back on legacy code for circles
Bringing master up to speed with ver228's master before PR
…s with some input parameters being lost during a merge
rolling back multicore summary - will put it back together with GUI changes to enable it
@ver228
Copy link
Owner

ver228 commented Dec 17, 2019

There are a lot of changes from the main branch consider that the modification you report is relatively small. I think you are using a version behind the last pull request. Could you sync to the current master HEAD and resend the pull request?

@ilbarlow
Copy link
Author

ilbarlow commented Dec 17, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants