Added MCDC Report feature

[Den1552]

Summary

Added an MC/DC report feature that allows the user to generate a report for a specific line. The report opens in a separate WebviewPanel, similar to the test generation report. Lines that are interactable are visually highlighted in the editor.

Usage

1. Ensure that Statement+MCDC is selected under Settings → VectorCAST Test Explorer → Build → Coverage Kind. If this setting is not selected, the coverage gutter will display the standard coverage icons and will not be interactable.

2. To generate a report, right-click on the coverage icon and choose Get MCDC Report. The report will open in a separate WebviewPanel.

3. In Settings → VectorCAST Test Explorer → MCDC Coverage Gutter Icons, you can choose to display either an arrow or an M as the icon in the coverage gutter.

TODOs

• Write a server-side implementation for retrieving the MCDC lines for the coverage icons, if necessary
• Refactoring

[github-actions]

Unit Test results - Vcast 2021sp0

 1 files  ±0   8 suites  ±0   13s ⏱️ ±0s
57 tests ±0  57 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
58 runs  ±0  58 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test results - Vcast 2023sp0

 1 files  ±0   8 suites  ±0   13s ⏱️ ±0s
57 tests ±0  57 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
58 runs  ±0  58 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test results - Vcast 2024sp5

 1 files  ±0   9 suites  ±0   14s ⏱️ -1s
65 tests ±0  65 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
66 runs  ±0  66 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Unit Test results - Vcast 2024sp4

 1 files  ±0   9 suites  ±0   14s ⏱️ ±0s
65 tests ±0  65 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
66 runs  ±0  66 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.23%. Comparing base (4fe9f6b) to head (9659af3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #243      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.20%   94.23%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        1450     1457       +7     
  Branches      157      157              
==========================================
+ Hits         1366     1373       +7     
  Misses         84       84              

Flag	Coverage Δ
Unit	94.23% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2023sp0 - Group build_different_envs

5 tests  ±0   5 ✅ ±0   35s ⏱️ ±0s
1 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2021sp0 - Group build_different_envs

5 tests  ±0   5 ✅ ±0   35s ⏱️ ±0s
1 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2024sp4 - Group build_different_envs_server

5 tests  ±0   5 ✅ ±0   32s ⏱️ -1s
1 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2024sp4 - Group build_different_envs

5 tests  ±0   5 ✅ ±0   32s ⏱️ -2s
1 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2021sp0 - Group flask_icon

9 tests  ±0   9 ✅ ±0   2m 6s ⏱️ -1s
1 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2023sp0 - Group flask_icon

9 tests  ±0   9 ✅ ±0   2m 4s ⏱️ +2s
1 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2021sp0 - Group build_env_failure

 2 files  ±0   2 suites  ±0   2m 42s ⏱️ +3s
 8 tests ±0   8 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
10 runs  ±0  10 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2021sp0 - Group func_basis

2 files  ±0  2 suites  ±0   2m 45s ⏱️ -1s
7 tests ±0  7 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
9 runs  ±0  9 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2023sp0 - Group build_env_failure

 2 files  ±0   2 suites  ±0   2m 40s ⏱️ -1s
 8 tests ±0   8 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
10 runs  ±0  10 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2023sp0 - Group func_basis

2 files  ±0  2 suites  ±0   2m 36s ⏱️ -10s
7 tests ±0  7 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
9 runs  ±0  9 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2024sp4 - Group build_env_failure_server

 2 files  ±0   2 suites  ±0   2m 34s ⏱️ ±0s
 8 tests ±0   8 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
10 runs  ±0  10 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2024sp4 - Group build_env_failure

 2 files  ±0   2 suites  ±0   2m 35s ⏱️ +2s
 8 tests ±0   8 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
10 runs  ±0  10 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9659af3. ± Comparison against base commit 4fe9f6b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2023sp0 - Group coverage

2 files  2 suites   1m 26s ⏱️
7 tests 7 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
9 runs  9 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 9659af3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2021sp0 - Group coverage

2 files  2 suites   1m 24s ⏱️
7 tests 7 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
9 runs  9 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 9659af3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2024sp4 - Group coverage

2 files  2 suites   1m 19s ⏱️
7 tests 7 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
9 runs  9 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 9659af3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2024sp4 - Group coverage_server

2 files  2 suites   1m 16s ⏱️
7 tests 7 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
9 runs  9 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 9659af3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2024sp5 - Group coverage

2 files  2 suites   1m 16s ⏱️
7 tests 7 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
9 runs  9 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 9659af3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

E2e Test results - Vcast 2024sp5 - Group coverage_server

2 files  2 suites   1m 16s ⏱️
7 tests 7 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
9 runs  9 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 9659af3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[Zbigor]

Went through all the changes, everything looks good. I haven't seen anything weird, the main comment is about the suggested refactor for clarity regarding all those nested if conditions.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
27 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud