fix: button-control page mistake #4963
Conversation
按钮控制展示逻辑错误
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the visibility conditions of buttons in the Changes
Suggested labels
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
playground/src/views/demos/access/button-control.vueOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.15.0 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find module '/node_modules/@vben/eslint-config/dist/index.mjs' imported from /eslint.config.mjs 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
playground/src/views/demos/access/button-control.vue (1)
Inconsistencies found in access code usage
There are several inconsistencies between the access codes used in the code and their display values:
In
playground/src/views/demos/access/button-control.vue:
- Code uses
AC_100100but displaysAC_1000100in button text- Inconsistent pairing of codes in combined access checks (e.g.,
AC_100100, AC_100030vsAC_100100, AC_1000001)In
apps/backend-mock/utils/mock-data.ts, the actual implemented access codes are:
- Super user:
['AC_100100', 'AC_100110', 'AC_100120', 'AC_100010']- Admin user:
['AC_100010', 'AC_100020', 'AC_100030']- User:
['AC_1000001', 'AC_1000002']Documentation in both English and Chinese versions shows different combinations of these codes than what's actually implemented
Please align the displayed values with the actual access codes being used, and ensure consistency with the backend mock data implementation.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
84-144: Verify access code consistency across the codebaseLet's ensure these access code changes are consistent across the entire codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of old access codes echo "Checking for old access codes..." rg -l "AC_100100|AC_100010" --type vue echo "Checking for new access codes usage..." rg -l "AC_1000100|AC_100030" --type vue echo "Checking for potential mixed usage..." rg -C 2 "AC_\d+" --type vueLength of output: 443
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any instances of access codes in all files echo "Checking for access codes usage..." rg -C 2 "AC_\d+" # Also check for specific access codes echo -e "\nChecking for specific access codes..." rg -C 2 "AC_1000100|AC_100030|AC_100100|AC_1000001"Length of output: 24752
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
playground/src/views/demos/access/button-control.vue(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
playground/src/views/demos/access/button-control.vue (1)
148-148: Good addition of frontend-only role-based access control
The conditional rendering of role-based controls based on accessMode is a good practice that prevents confusion when using backend mode.
Description
按钮控制展示逻辑错误
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Summary by CodeRabbit