-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf: adjustment of auth form spelling errors, type adjustment, closer to actual development #4694
Conversation
…actual development
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to both localization files and TypeScript components across various directories. The localization updates standardize Chinese terms related to authentication, while the TypeScript modifications primarily focus on changing parameter types from specific structures (like Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (27)
apps/web-antd/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json (1)
3-6
: Summary: Improved Chinese translations for login-related termsThe changes in this file consistently update the translation of "login" from "登陆" (to land) to "登录" (to log in) across multiple login-related terms. These corrections enhance the accuracy of the Chinese translations and improve the overall quality of the localization.
Consider implementing a glossary or translation memory system for maintaining consistency in translations across the project. This can help prevent similar discrepancies in the future and streamline the localization process.
packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/types.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-69
: Consider enhancing theAuthenticationProps
interfaceWhile the
AuthenticationProps
interface itself hasn't changed, here are some suggestions to improve its structure and maintainability:
Internationalization: Consider using English for JSDoc comments to improve accessibility for non-Chinese speaking developers. You could use a translation tool or documentation generator that supports multiple languages if bilingual documentation is needed.
Type Specificity: Some properties could benefit from more specific types. For example:
- Use a union type for
submitButtonText
to limit it to specific strings.- Consider using an enum for the different login paths.
Separation of Concerns: The interface mixes routing, UI state, and text content. Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused interfaces.
Here's an example of how you might refactor part of the interface:
enum LoginPath { CODE = '/code-login', QRCODE = '/qrcode-login', REGISTER = '/register', FORGET_PASSWORD = '/forget-password' } interface AuthenticationUIProps { showCodeLogin: boolean; showForgetPassword: boolean; showQrcodeLogin: boolean; showRegister: boolean; showRememberMe: boolean; showThirdPartyLogin: boolean; loading: boolean; } interface AuthenticationTextProps { title: string; subTitle: string; submitButtonText: 'Login' | 'Register' | 'Reset Password'; } interface AuthenticationProps { paths: Partial<Record<keyof typeof LoginPath, string>>; ui: Partial<AuthenticationUIProps>; text: Partial<AuthenticationTextProps>; }This refactoring improves type safety, separates concerns, and makes the interface more maintainable. Consider adopting a similar structure if it aligns with your project's needs.
apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (2)
31-34
: Update function body to match new parameter type.The change from
string
toRecordable<any>
for thevalue
parameter is good for flexibility. However, the function body should be updated to reflect this change.Consider the following improvements:
- Update the console.log statement to accurately represent the new data structure:
- console.log('reset email:', value); + console.log('reset data:', value);
- Consider using a more specific type instead of
Recordable<any>
for better type safety. For example:interface ForgetPasswordData { email: string; // Add any other fields that might be present } function handleSubmit(value: Recordable<ForgetPasswordData>) { console.log('reset data:', value); // Add type-safe handling of the value object }
- Implement proper error handling and form submission logic.
Line range hint
1-43
: Summary: Improved flexibility with potential for enhanced type safetyThe changes in this file align well with the PR objectives of adjusting types to be closer to actual development practices. The introduction of the
Recordable
type and the update to thehandleSubmit
function signature provide more flexibility in handling form data.However, to fully realize the benefits of these changes:
- Ensure that the increased flexibility doesn't come at the cost of type safety. Consider using more specific types where possible.
- Update the function body and any related logic to properly handle the new data structure.
- Verify that these changes are consistent across all related components in the authentication flow.
As you continue to refactor the authentication components, consider creating a shared interface for authentication-related data structures. This could help maintain consistency and type safety across the entire authentication flow.
apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (1)
Line range hint
1-44
: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives, but consider additional improvements.The modifications in this file successfully address the PR objective of type adjustment. The changes improve flexibility in handling form data, which is beneficial for actual development practices. However, there are a few points to consider:
While the type adjustments have been made, no spelling errors were addressed in this file. If there were any spelling issues, they might have been overlooked.
The increased flexibility comes with a potential trade-off in type safety. Consider if more specific types could be used without sacrificing the desired flexibility.
Ensure that these changes are consistently applied across all related components in the authentication module for maintainability and consistency.
Update any relevant documentation to reflect these changes, especially if they affect the component's API or usage.
To maintain consistency across the authentication module, consider creating a shared type for authentication-related form data. This could improve type safety while maintaining flexibility:
// In a shared types file (e.g., authTypes.ts) export interface AuthFormData extends Recordable<any> { email: string; // Add other common fields as needed } // Then in your component function handleSubmit(value: AuthFormData) { // ... }This approach would provide better type hinting and catch potential errors earlier in the development process.
apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (2)
31-31
: Approved: Function signature updated for flexibility, but consider improving type safety.The change from
string
toRecordable<any>
aligns with similar modifications across other components, allowing for more flexible input handling. This is good for standardizing the API across the authentication module.However, consider defining a more specific type instead of using
any
to maintain better type safety. For example:type ForgetPasswordFormData = { email: string; // Add any other fields that might be part of the form }; function handleSubmit(value: Recordable<ForgetPasswordFormData>) { // ... }This would provide flexibility while still ensuring type safety for the expected form fields.
Line range hint
1-44
: Overall: Changes improve flexibility while maintaining component integrity.The modifications to this component align well with the PR objectives of adjusting types to be closer to actual development practices. The changes improve flexibility without introducing breaking changes or altering the core functionality.
To further enhance the component, consider adding error handling to the
handleSubmit
function. For example:function handleSubmit(value: Recordable<any>) { try { // Perform the password reset logic here console.log('reset email:', value); } catch (error) { // Handle any errors that occur during the process console.error('Error during password reset:', error); // You might want to set an error state or display a notification to the user } }This would improve the robustness of the component and provide a better user experience in case of errors.
apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (1)
53-53
: Consider using a more specific type forvalues
.The change from
LoginCodeParams
toRecordable<any>
makes the function more flexible and consistent with changes in other authentication components. However, usingRecordable<any>
might lead to a loss of type safety.While this change is acceptable, consider using a more specific type if the structure of
values
is known. For example:async function handleLogin(values: Recordable<string>) { // ... }This would provide better type safety while still allowing for flexibility.
apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (1)
53-53
: Consider using a more specific type thanRecordable<any>
.The change to
Recordable<any>
aligns with the PR objectives and provides flexibility. However, usingany
might lead to potential type safety issues. If possible, consider defining a more specific interface for the expected login values to maintain type safety while still allowing for flexibility.For example, you could define a type like this:
type LoginValues = Recordable<string | number>;And then use it in the function signature:
async function handleLogin(values: LoginValues) { // ... }This would provide more type safety while still allowing for flexibility in the structure of the login values.
apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (1)
53-53
: Consider using a more specific type forhandleLogin
parameterThe change from
LoginCodeParams
toRecordable<any>
aligns with the PR objectives and makes the function more flexible. However, usingany
might reduce type safety.Consider defining a more specific type for the expected login values, e.g.,
Recordable<string>
or a custom interface, to maintain better type safety while still allowing flexibility.playground/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (1)
53-53
: LGTM: Function signature updated for flexibility, but consider type safety.The change from
LoginCodeParams
toRecordable<any>
aligns with the PR objectives and similar changes in other components. This provides more flexibility in handling different types of login data.However, using
any
might reduce type safety. Consider using a more specific type or interface that describes the expected structure of the login data, such asRecordable<{ phoneNumber: string; code: string }>
. This would maintain flexibility while providing better type checking.packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/qrcode-login.vue (1)
18-20
: Approved: Consistent terminology in comments.The update from "登陆路径" to "登录路径" in the comment for the
loginPath
property is a positive change. It aligns with the standardization of Chinese terms related to authentication across the project, as mentioned in the PR summary. This consistency in terminology helps maintain clear and accurate documentation.Consider reviewing other files in the project to ensure this terminology update is applied consistently across all relevant comments and documentation.
packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/forget-password.vue (2)
50-50
: Approved with suggestion: Consider using a more specific type for emitThe change from
[string]
to[Record<string, any>]
for thesubmit
event emission provides more flexibility in the data that can be emitted. This aligns with the PR objective of adjusting types to be closer to actual development practices.However, using
Record<string, any>
might lead to potential type safety issues. If the structure of the emitted data is known, consider using a more specific interface or type to maintain type safety while still allowing flexibility.For example:
interface SubmitData { email: string; // Add other fields as needed } submit: [SubmitData];This approach balances flexibility with type safety.
67-70
: Approved with suggestion: Improve error handling in handleSubmitThe changes to
handleSubmit
function are good improvements:
- It now properly validates the form before getting values.
- Emitting the entire
values
object allows for more comprehensive data submission.However, there's an opportunity to improve error handling. Consider adding error handling for the case where validation fails. Here's a suggested improvement:
async function handleSubmit() { try { const { valid } = await validate(); if (valid) { const values = await getValues(); emit('submit', values); } else { // Handle invalid form console.error('Form validation failed'); // Optionally, you could emit an error event or show a user-friendly message } } catch (error) { console.error('An error occurred during form submission:', error); // Handle any unexpected errors } }This approach provides more robust error handling and improves the overall reliability of the form submission process.
packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/code-login.vue (2)
51-51
: Approved: Emit type change increases flexibility, but consider type safety.The change from
LoginCodeEmits['submit']
to[Recordable<any>]
aligns with the more flexible typing approach. However, this reduces type safety for the emitted event data.Consider defining a specific interface for the emitted data to maintain some level of type safety:
interface CodeLoginSubmitData { code: string; phoneNumber: string; [key: string]: any; // Allow additional properties } // Then use it in the emit declaration submit: [CodeLoginSubmitData];This approach would provide better type checking while still allowing for flexibility.
Line range hint
68-75
: Approved: Updated emit structure, but consider adding value validation.The
handleSubmit
function has been updated to usegetValues()
and construct the emitted object with specific properties. This aligns well with the newRecordable<any>
type.Consider adding validation for the extracted values to prevent undefined values from being emitted:
const values = await getValues(); if (valid && values?.code && values?.phoneNumber) { emit('submit', { code: values.code, phoneNumber: values.phoneNumber, }); } else { // Handle the case where required values are missing console.error('Required form values are missing'); }This ensures that only valid and complete data is emitted.
packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/lock-screen/lock-screen-modal.vue (2)
26-26
: Consider using a more specific type for emitThe change from a specific
LockAndRegisterParams
type toRecordable<any>
aligns with the PR's objective of adjusting types. However, usingany
might reduce type safety. If possible, consider using a more specific type that still allows for flexibility, such asRecordable<string>
if the emitted value is always a string, or define a new interface that accurately represents the expected structure.
65-68
: LGTM with a suggestion for error handlingThe changes to the
handleSubmit
function improve code clarity by separating validation and value retrieval. Emitting only thelockScreenPassword
is more specific and potentially more secure than emitting the entire form values object.Consider adding error handling for cases where
values
orlockScreenPassword
might be undefined:if (valid && values?.lockScreenPassword) { emit('submit', values.lockScreenPassword); } else { // Handle error or invalid state console.error('Invalid form or missing lockScreenPassword'); }This would provide more robust error handling and prevent potential issues with undefined values.
apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (1)
90-93
: LGTM! Consider using a more specific type if possible.The change to
Recordable<any>
for thehandleSubmit
function parameter is consistent with the import modifications and increases flexibility. However, usingany
reduces type safety. If the structure of the input is known, consider using a more specific type to maintain type checking benefits.If the structure of the registration form data is known, consider defining a specific interface:
interface RegistrationFormData { username: string; password: string; confirmPassword: string; agreePolicy: boolean; } function handleSubmit(value: Recordable<RegistrationFormData>) { // Function body remains the same }This approach maintains flexibility while providing better type checking.
apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (1)
90-93
: Approved with suggestion: Consider using a more specific typeThe change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
in thehandleSubmit
function signature aligns with the import changes and makes the function more flexible. This change doesn't affect the current implementation as the function body only logs the received value.However, using
any
type might lead to a loss of type safety, potentially making it harder to catch errors at compile-time. Consider using a more specific type if the structure of the registration form data is known and consistent. For example:function handleSubmit(value: Recordable<string | boolean>) { // ... }This would still provide flexibility while maintaining some level of type safety.
apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (2)
90-93
: Consider adding runtime type checking forhandleSubmit
parametersWhile changing to
Recordable<any>
provides flexibility, it removes compile-time type checking. To maintain type safety, consider adding runtime type checking or validation for the expected properties of thevalue
parameter.Here's a suggestion to add basic type checking:
-function handleSubmit(value: Recordable<any>) { +function handleSubmit(value: Recordable<any>) { + // Basic runtime type checking + if (typeof value.username !== 'string' || typeof value.password !== 'string' || typeof value.confirmPassword !== 'string' || typeof value.agreePolicy !== 'boolean') { + console.error('Invalid input types for registration'); + return; + } // eslint-disable-next-line no-console console.log('register submit:', value); }
Line range hint
1-105
: Summary of changes and their implicationsThe changes in this file primarily involve adjusting the type system approach:
- Replacing
LoginAndRegisterParams
withRecordable<any>
.- Updating the
handleSubmit
function signature accordingly.These changes align with the PR objectives of type adjustment. While they introduce more flexibility, they also reduce type safety. Consider the following recommendations:
- Ensure this change is applied consistently across all relevant components.
- Add runtime type checking or validation where
Recordable<any>
is used to maintain type safety.- Update documentation to reflect these changes in the type system approach.
playground/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (1)
90-90
: Consider using a more specific type for improved type safety.The change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
aligns with the import changes and provides more flexibility. However, usingany
might lead to a loss of type safety.Consider defining a more specific type for the form data to maintain type safety while still allowing for flexibility. For example:
type RegisterFormData = { username: string; password: string; confirmPassword: string; agreePolicy: boolean; }; function handleSubmit(value: Recordable<RegisterFormData>) { // ... }This approach provides both flexibility and type safety.
playground/src/store/auth.ts (1)
29-30
: LGTM, but consider using a more specific type if possible.The change to
Recordable<any>
for theparams
parameter is consistent with the import changes and allows for more flexible parameter passing. However, if the structure of the login parameters is known, consider using a more specific type (e.g.,Recordable<string>
or a custom interface) to maintain some level of type safety while still allowing flexibility.If the login parameters have a known structure, consider defining a custom interface:
interface LoginParams { username: string; password: string; // Add other known fields } async function authLogin( params: Recordable<LoginParams>, onSuccess?: () => Promise<void> | void, ) { // ... existing implementation }apps/web-ele/src/store/auth.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-116
: Overall assessment of changes in auth.tsThe changes in this file align with the PR objectives of addressing spelling errors and making type adjustments. The parameter type change in
authLogin
increases flexibility but at the cost of type safety, which should be carefully considered. The comment correction improves consistency in terminology.Consider the following recommendations:
- Evaluate the trade-off between flexibility and type safety in the
authLogin
function.- Ensure that all calls to
authLogin
across the project are updated to match the new parameter type.- Review the entire file for any other instances where similar type adjustments or terminology corrections might be beneficial.
apps/web-naive/src/store/auth.ts (2)
28-28
: Consider using a more specific type instead ofRecordable<any>
.The change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
increases flexibility but might reduce type safety. While this aligns with changes in other files, consider using a more specific type if the structure of the login parameters is known. This could help prevent potential runtime errors and improve code maintainability.For example, if the login parameters are known, you could define a type like:
type LoginParams = Recordable<string | number | boolean>;This would provide more type safety than
Recordable<any>
while still allowing flexibility.
Line range hint
1-115
: Overall, the changes improve consistency but consider refining type definitions.The modifications in this file align well with the project-wide updates mentioned in the PR objectives and AI summary. The changes improve consistency in type usage and terminology across the project. However, to further enhance type safety and maintainability, consider defining more specific types for the login parameters instead of using
Recordable<any>
.As a follow-up action, it would be beneficial to review the actual structure of the login parameters and create a more specific type definition if possible. This would help balance the need for flexibility with the benefits of strong typing.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
- apps/web-antd/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json (1 hunks)
- apps/web-antd/src/store/auth.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (2 hunks)
- apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (2 hunks)
- apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (2 hunks)
- apps/web-ele/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json (1 hunks)
- apps/web-ele/src/store/auth.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (2 hunks)
- apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (2 hunks)
- apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (2 hunks)
- apps/web-naive/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json (1 hunks)
- apps/web-naive/src/store/auth.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (2 hunks)
- apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (2 hunks)
- apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (2 hunks)
- docs/src/guide/in-depth/access.md (1 hunks)
- packages/constants/src/core.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/code-login.vue (4 hunks)
- packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/forget-password.vue (3 hunks)
- packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/login.vue (3 hunks)
- packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/qrcode-login.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/register.vue (4 hunks)
- packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/lock-screen/lock-screen-modal.vue (3 hunks)
- playground/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json (1 hunks)
- playground/src/store/auth.ts (3 hunks)
- playground/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (2 hunks)
- playground/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (1 hunks)
- playground/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (2 hunks)
- playground/src/views/demos/access/button-control.vue (2 hunks)
- playground/src/views/demos/access/index.vue (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- apps/web-ele/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json
- apps/web-naive/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json
- packages/constants/src/core.ts
- playground/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (57)
apps/web-antd/src/locales/langs/zh-CN/page.json (3)
3-3
: Approved: Correction of Chinese translation for "login"The change from "登陆" to "登录" is correct. "登录" is the accurate term for "login" in Chinese, while "登陆" means "to land". This improvement enhances the translation accuracy.
5-5
: Approved: Consistent correction for "codeLogin" translationThe change from "验证码登陆" to "验证码登录" is correct and consistent with the previous update. This ensures that the term for "login" is accurately translated throughout the file.
6-6
: Approved: Consistent correction for "qrcodeLogin" translationThe change from "二维码登陆" to "二维码登录" is correct and consistent with the previous updates. This completes the standardization of the "login" term in this file.
To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script to check for any remaining instances of "登陆" in other localization files:
If any results are returned, consider updating those instances as well for project-wide consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following corrected script to check for any remaining instances of "登陆" in localization files:
Verified: No remaining instances of "登陆" found in localization files
The shell script did not find any instances of "登陆" in localization files, confirming that the translation change is consistent across the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of "登陆" in localization files # Search for "登陆" in all JSON files under the locales directory rg '"登陆"' $(fd -e json -p '**/locales/')Length of output: 333
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of "登陆" in localization files # Search for "登陆" in all JSON files under the locales directory rg '"登陆"' $(fd --glob 'locales/**/*.json')Length of output: 44
packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
7-8
: Consider the implications of removing type exportsThe removal of
LoginAndRegisterParams
andLoginCodeParams
type exports aligns with the PR objective of adjusting types. However, this change may have several implications:
- It could potentially break type checking in other parts of the codebase that were importing these types.
- Using
Recordable<any>
instead of specific parameter types might make the API less type-safe.- The change could affect documentation and developer experience, as specific parameter types often provide more clarity about expected input.
To assess the impact of this change, please run the following script:
This script will help us verify if all usages of the removed types have been updated and if
Recordable<any>
is now being used in their place.packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/types.ts (1)
70-70
: Verify the impact of removed exports on dependent modulesThe export statement has been simplified to only include
AuthenticationProps
. This change aligns with the removal of several types and interfaces (LoginAndRegisterParams
,LoginCodeParams
,LoginEmits
,LoginCodeEmits
,RegisterEmits
) as mentioned in the summary.While this simplification can lead to a cleaner API, it's crucial to ensure that:
- All modules previously importing these removed types have been updated accordingly.
- The shift to more generic types (like
Recordable<any>
) in place of specific types likeLoginAndRegisterParams
doesn't lead to a loss of type safety in dependent modules.To check for any remaining usage of the removed types, run the following script:
If any matches are found, please update the corresponding files to use the new type structure or import only
AuthenticationProps
as needed.playground/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (2)
Line range hint
1-42
: LGTM: Changes are consistent with component structureThe modification to the
handleSubmit
function signature is consistent with the overall structure of the component:
- It aligns well with the
formSchema
definition, which includes an email field.- The usage of
AuthenticationForgetPassword
component in the template remains correct with the@submit
event handler.- The
VbenFormSchema
type is properly imported and utilized in theformSchema
computed property.- Localization is correctly implemented using the
$t
function.These changes enhance type safety and flexibility without disrupting the component's functionality.
30-33
: Update console.log to reflect new parameter typeThe
handleSubmit
function now accepts aRecord<string, any>
instead of a string, which is a good change as it aligns with the form schema. However, the console.log statement should be updated to reflect this change.Consider updating the console.log statement as follows:
- console.log('reset email:', value); + console.log('reset email:', value.email);This change assumes that the email is stored in the
value
object, which aligns with the form schema defined informSchema
.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, let's check for similar patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Console.log update is consistent across the codebase
No additional
handleSubmit
functions withconsole.log
found in other.vue
files, ensuring the change is localized and consistent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar handleSubmit functions in other files rg -U 'function handleSubmit.*?\{.*?console\.log.*?\}' --type vueLength of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar handleSubmit functions in .vue files rg -U 'function handleSubmit.*?\{.*?console\.log.*?\}' --glob '*.vue'Length of output: 71
apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (1)
3-3
: LGTM. Verify type consistency across the project.The addition of the
Recordable
type import from '@vben/types' is appropriate and aligns with similar changes in other components. This change introduces more flexibility in handling data structures.To ensure consistency, let's verify the usage of
Recordable
type across the project:✅ Verification successful
Verified type consistency across the project.
All instances of
LoginAndRegisterParams
have been successfully replaced with theRecordable<any>
type, ensuring consistent type usage throughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of Recordable type across the project # Test: Search for Recordable type usage rg "Recordable<any>" --type ts --type vue # Test: Check for any remaining usage of LoginAndRegisterParams rg "LoginAndRegisterParams" --type ts --type vueLength of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of Recordable type across the project # Test: Search for Recordable<any> usage in .ts and .vue files rg "Recordable<any>" --type ts -g "*.vue" # Test: Check for any remaining usage of LoginAndRegisterParams in .ts and .vue files rg "LoginAndRegisterParams" --type ts -g "*.vue"Length of output: 1878
apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (2)
3-3
: LGTM: New import aligns with type adjustments.The addition of the
Recordable
type import from '@vben/types' is appropriate and necessary for the subsequent changes in the file. This change supports the PR's objective of type adjustment and improves type safety.
31-31
: Approved with suggestions: Consider type safety and function implementation.The change from
string
toRecordable<any>
for thehandleSubmit
function parameter allows for more flexible input types, which aligns with the PR's objective of type adjustment. However, consider the following suggestions:
Type safety: While
Recordable<any>
provides flexibility, it might reduce type safety. Consider using a more specific type if the structure of the form data is known.Function implementation: Ensure that the function body correctly handles the new input type to avoid potential runtime errors.
To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
This script will help identify potential areas that might need adjustment due to the type change.
✅ Verification successful
Change Verified:
handleSubmit
function signature updated correctly.The update from
string
toRecordable<any>
for thehandleSubmit
function parameter has been consistently applied across the codebase. NoTODO
orFIXME
comments related tohandleSubmit
were found, and error handling implementations remain unaffected. This change enhances flexibility without introducing type mismatches.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential type mismatches or errors related to the handleSubmit function # Search for usages of handleSubmit in the codebase echo "Searching for handleSubmit usages:" rg -p "handleSubmit" --type vue # Check for any TODO or FIXME comments related to handleSubmit echo "Checking for TODO or FIXME comments related to handleSubmit:" rg -p "TODO|FIXME.*handleSubmit" --type vue # Search for any error handling related to handleSubmit echo "Checking for error handling related to handleSubmit:" rg -p "try.*catch.*handleSubmit" --type vueLength of output: 532
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retry searching for handleSubmit usages without specifying file type echo "Searching for handleSubmit usages without specifying file type:" rg "handleSubmit" echo "Checking for TODO or FIXME comments related to handleSubmit without specifying file type:" rg -e "TODO.*handleSubmit" -e "FIXME.*handleSubmit" echo "Checking for error handling related to handleSubmit without specifying file type:" rg "try.*catch.*handleSubmit"Length of output: 7338
apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/forget-password.vue (1)
3-3
: LGTM: New import enhances type safety.The addition of the
Recordable
type import from '@vben/types' is a good practice. It provides explicit typing for thehandleSubmit
function parameter, enhancing type safety and code readability.apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (1)
2-3
: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The addition of the
Recordable
type import from '@vben/types' is consistent with the changes made to thehandleLogin
function signature. This change allows for more flexible typing, which can be beneficial when handling various form structures.apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (2)
2-3
: LGTM: Import changes align with type adjustments.The addition of
Recordable
import and removal ofLoginCodeParams
reflect a shift towards more generic typing. This change is consistent with the PR objectives and promotes flexibility in handling various data structures.
Line range hint
1-67
: Summary: Type adjustments improve flexibility with minimal impact on functionality.The changes in this file focus on type adjustments, moving from specific types to more generic ones. This aligns with the PR objectives and improves flexibility in handling login data. The core functionality of the component remains unchanged, and no breaking changes are introduced.
However, it's worth noting that the shift to more generic types (like
Recordable<any>
) might slightly reduce type safety. Consider balancing flexibility with type safety by using more specific generic types where possible.Overall, these changes are a step towards standardizing the handling of login-related parameters across the codebase.
apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (2)
2-3
: Import changes align with PR objectivesThe addition of
Recordable
import and the removal ofLoginCodeParams
are consistent with the PR's goal of type adjustment. This change allows for more flexible typing in the component.
Line range hint
66-70
: Verify compatibility with AuthenticationCodeLogin componentThe changes to the
handleLogin
function signature don't affect the template or form structure. However, it's important to ensure that theAuthenticationCodeLogin
component is compatible with the newRecordable<any>
type for the@submit
event.Please run the following script to check the
AuthenticationCodeLogin
component definition:playground/src/views/_core/authentication/code-login.vue (2)
2-3
: LGTM: Import changes align with type adjustments.The addition of
Recordable
import and removal ofLoginCodeParams
(as inferred from the AI summary) align with the PR objectives of type adjustment. This change moves towards a more flexible typing approach, which can be beneficial for actual development practices.
Line range hint
1-67
: Overall impact: Low risk, but verify functionality.The changes to this component are primarily type-related and don't affect its core functionality or behavior. The more flexible typing allows for easier integration with different data structures, which aligns with the PR objectives.
However, to ensure that these changes haven't introduced any unforeseen issues:
- Verify that the login process still works as expected with the new typing.
- Test edge cases, such as submitting the form with unexpected data structures.
- Ensure that any dependent components or services are compatible with the new
Recordable<any>
type.To assist in verifying the changes, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies or remaining usages of the old type, ensuring that the changes have been applied consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Type Changes Verified and Consistent Across Codebase
The changes to use
Recordable<any>
instead ofLoginCodeParams
are consistent across the codebase, with no remaining instances ofLoginCodeParams
found. TheRecordable<any>
type is uniformly applied in relevant components and store modules, ensuring type consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of LoginCodeParams and potential inconsistencies # Search for any remaining usage of LoginCodeParams echo "Searching for remaining usage of LoginCodeParams:" rg "LoginCodeParams" # Search for other similar changes from specific types to Recordable<any> echo "Searching for similar type changes to Recordable<any>:" rg "Recordable<any>" # Search for potential inconsistencies in handleLogin function signatures echo "Searching for handleLogin function signatures:" rg "function handleLogin"Length of output: 2882
packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/forget-password.vue (2)
20-20
: Approved: Corrected Chinese spelling for "login path"The change from "登陆路径" to "登录路径" is correct. This improves the accuracy of the Chinese localization for the login path description.
53-53
: Approved: Added getValues to form utilitiesThe addition of
getValues
to the destructured return value ofuseVbenForm
is a good improvement. This allows for more granular control over form data retrieval, separating it from the validation process. This change supports the more flexible data submission approach introduced in this PR.playground/src/views/demos/access/index.vue (1)
2-2
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider the trade-offs of using
Recordable<any>
The change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
for theaccounts
object type increases flexibility but may reduce type safety. While this aligns with similar changes across the project, consider the following points:
Flexibility vs. Type Safety:
Recordable<any>
allows for more flexible object structures but sacrifices some type checking benefits. This could potentially lead to runtime errors if unexpected data structures are used.Consistency: Ensure this change is consistent with the project's overall typing strategy and that it doesn't break any assumptions in other parts of the codebase.
Documentation: With a more flexible type, it becomes crucial to document the expected structure of the
accounts
object to prevent misuse.Consider using a more specific type that still allows for flexibility, such as:
type AccountInfo = { username: string; password: string; [key: string]: any; }; const accounts: Record<string, AccountInfo> = { // ... (rest of the code remains the same) };This approach maintains flexibility while providing some type safety for essential fields.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies or potential issues related to the type change.
Also applies to: 14-14
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Type Change Consistently Applied
The type change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
has been consistently applied in the relevant files (index.vue
andbutton-control.vue
), with no remaining references to the old type. No issues were found regarding type inconsistencies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of Recordable<any> and potential LoginAndRegisterParams references # Test 1: Check for any remaining references to LoginAndRegisterParams echo "Checking for LoginAndRegisterParams references:" rg "LoginAndRegisterParams" # Test 2: Verify consistent usage of Recordable<any> for account-related objects echo "Checking for consistent Recordable<any> usage:" rg "Record<string,\s*Recordable<any>>" # Test 3: Look for potential type-related issues or inconsistencies echo "Checking for potential type-related issues:" ast-grep --pattern 'const $VAR: $TYPE = $EXPR' -l typescriptLength of output: 229246
packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/code-login.vue (3)
21-21
: Approved: Corrected Chinese spelling for "login".The comment for the
loginPath
prop has been updated to use the correct Chinese character for "login". This improves the accuracy of the documentation.
56-56
: Approved: Improved form handling with separated validation and value retrieval.The changes in form handling logic improve the separation of concerns:
- Including
getValues
in the destructuring ofuseVbenForm
return value.- Separating the validation process from value retrieval in
handleSubmit
.These changes allow for more flexible handling of form data and align well with the use of
Recordable<any>
.Also applies to: 68-69
2-2
: Approved: Import change aligns with PR objectives, but consider type safety.The change from a specific
LoginCodeParams
type to the more flexibleRecordable<any>
aligns with the PR's goal of type adjustment. However, be aware that this may reduce type safety in the component.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Import changes are consistent across authentication components.
All instances of
LoginCodeParams
have been successfully replaced withRecordable<any>
in the authentication-related files, ensuring consistent and flexible type usage throughout the component.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of LoginCodeParams # and verify the adoption of Recordable<any> in related files. echo "Checking for remaining LoginCodeParams usages:" rg "LoginCodeParams" echo "\nVerifying Recordable<any> usage in authentication files:" rg "Recordable<any>" "packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/"Length of output: 595
packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/lock-screen/lock-screen-modal.vue (2)
2-2
: LGTM: Import of Recordable typeThe addition of the
Recordable
type import is appropriate and aligns with the type changes made in the component. This import enhances type safety and clarity in the code.
29-29
: LGTM: Destructuring getValues from useVbenFormThe addition of
getValues
to the destructured return value ofuseVbenForm
is a good change. It allows for more efficient access to form values and is used appropriately in thehandleSubmit
function.packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/register.vue (5)
21-21
: Approved: Chinese terminology correctionThe comment for
loginPath
has been updated from "登陆路径" to "登录路径". This change corrects the Chinese terminology and aligns with the PR objective of addressing spelling errors.
55-55
: Approved: AddedgetValues
method for form handlingThe
getValues
method has been added to the destructured return ofuseVbenForm
. This addition enhances the form handling capabilities and is likely related to changes in thehandleSubmit
function. It allows for more flexible retrieval of form values.
69-70
: Approved: Improved form submission processThe
handleSubmit
function has been updated to usevalidate()
andgetValues()
separately. This change:
- Separates the validation and value retrieval steps.
- Provides more control over the form submission process.
- Is consistent with the addition of
getValues
in theuseVbenForm
call.This approach allows for more flexible handling of form data and validation, which can be beneficial for error handling and user feedback.
52-52
: Approved: Emit type generalized, consider type safetyThe type of the
submit
event has been changed fromRegisterEmits['submit']
to[Recordable<any>]
. This change is consistent with the move towards more flexible typing and aligns with the PR objectives. However, while this enhances reusability, it might reduce type safety.Consider using a more specific type if possible, or adding runtime type checks to ensure data integrity.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across similar components:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent emit type changes in authentication components # Test: Search for similar emit declarations in authentication components echo "Emit declarations in authentication components:" rg "submit:.*Recordable.*" packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/
2-2
: Approved: Import ofRecordable
enhances type flexibilityThe addition of
Recordable
import from '@vben/types' and the removal ofLoginAndRegisterParams
(as mentioned in the AI summary) indicate a shift towards more flexible typing. This change aligns well with the PR objective of type adjustment and closer alignment with actual development practices.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of
Recordable
:apps/web-antd/src/store/auth.ts (3)
86-86
: Approved: Improved Chinese terminology in commentThe correction of "登陆" to "登录" in the comment improves the accuracy of the Chinese terminology used. This change enhances code readability for Chinese-speaking developers and maintains consistency with other localization updates in the project.
Line range hint
1-116
: Summary: Minor changes with potential implicationsThe changes in this file include:
- Updating the
authLogin
function parameter type toRecordable<any>
.- Correcting Chinese terminology in a comment.
While these changes are minor, the type change in
authLogin
could have broader implications for type safety and consistency across the project.To ensure these changes don't introduce inconsistencies, let's verify the usage of
authLogin
across the project:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of authLogin function across the project # Test: Search for authLogin function calls rg -A 5 'authLogin\('This will help identify any potential issues with how
authLogin
is being called in other parts of the codebase.
28-28
:⚠️ Potential issueConsider using a more specific type than
Recordable<any>
The change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
increases flexibility but at the cost of type safety. While this aligns with changes in other components, it may lead to potential runtime errors and reduced code clarity.Consider using a union type or a generic constraint to maintain some level of type safety while allowing for flexibility. For example:
type LoginParams = { username: string; password: string; [key: string]: any; }; async function authLogin( params: LoginParams, onSuccess?: () => Promise<void> | void, ) { // ... }This approach provides better type hinting for required fields while still allowing additional properties.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce inconsistencies, let's check the
loginApi
implementation:apps/web-antd/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (1)
2-3
: LGTM! Verify type compatibility across the codebase.The change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
aligns with the PR objective of type adjustment and potentially improves code flexibility. This change looks good, but ensure thatRecordable<any>
is compatible with the previousLoginAndRegisterParams
type throughout the codebase.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified! The import changes are correctly implemented, and
Recordable<any>
is consistently used without introducing type errors across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of LoginAndRegisterParams and verify Recordable usage # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of LoginAndRegisterParams echo "Checking for remaining LoginAndRegisterParams imports:" rg "import.*LoginAndRegisterParams.*from.*@vben/common-ui" # Test 2: Verify Recordable usage in other files echo "Checking Recordable usage:" rg "Recordable<any>" # Test 3: Check for any type errors related to this change echo "Checking for potential type errors:" rg "Type.*'Recordable<any>'.*is not assignable to type"Length of output: 2437
apps/web-ele/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (1)
2-3
: Approved: Import changes align with function signature updateThe addition of
Recordable
import and removal ofLoginAndRegisterParams
import are consistent with the changes in thehandleSubmit
function signature. This move towards a more flexible typing system could allow for easier extensibility of the registration form in the future.However, be aware that this change might slightly reduce type safety if
LoginAndRegisterParams
was providing more specific type information. Ensure that this doesn't lead to any loss of important type checks elsewhere in the codebase.To verify the impact of this change, let's check for any remaining usages of
LoginAndRegisterParams
:apps/web-naive/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (1)
2-3
: Consider the trade-offs of usingRecordable<any>
instead ofLoginAndRegisterParams
The change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
introduces more flexibility but potentially reduces type safety. While this allows for a more generic approach, it might make it harder to catch type-related errors at compile-time.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, let's verify the usage:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
LoginAndRegisterParams
has been fully replaced withRecordable<any>
All instances of
LoginAndRegisterParams
have been removed, andRecordable<any>
is consistently used in allhandleSubmit
functions across the codebase. This change ensures uniformity and increases flexibility in form handling.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of LoginAndRegisterParams # and verify consistent usage of Recordable<any> for form submissions # Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of LoginAndRegisterParams echo "Checking for remaining LoginAndRegisterParams imports:" rg "import.*LoginAndRegisterParams.*from.*@vben/common-ui" # Test 2: Verify consistent usage of Recordable<any> in handleSubmit functions echo "Checking for consistent usage of Recordable<any> in handleSubmit functions:" rg "function\s+handleSubmit.*:\s*Recordable<any>"Length of output: 1152
playground/src/views/_core/authentication/register.vue (2)
Line range hint
101-105
: Verify compatibility with AuthenticationRegister component.While the changes in import and function signature don't directly affect the rest of this component, it's important to ensure that the
AuthenticationRegister
component can handle the newRecordable<any>
type passed to it via the@submit
event.Please verify the following:
- Check the
AuthenticationRegister
component's implementation to ensure it can handle the newRecordable<any>
type.- Update any relevant documentation or prop types for the
AuthenticationRegister
component if necessary.You can use the following script to locate the
AuthenticationRegister
component definition:#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate AuthenticationRegister component definition # Test: Search for AuthenticationRegister component rg -A 10 "defineComponent.*AuthenticationRegister"
2-3
: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectives.The addition of
Recordable
type from '@vben/types' and the removal ofLoginAndRegisterParams
align with the PR's objective of type adjustment. This change suggests a move towards more flexible data structures for form handling.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining usages of
LoginAndRegisterParams
in the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Verified: Import changes are correctly implemented and do not introduce any issues.
The removal of
LoginAndRegisterParams
has been successfully verified with no remaining usages found in the codebase. The introduction ofRecordable
aligns with existing practices and its widespread usage across multiple files confirms a seamless integration.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of LoginAndRegisterParams # Test: Search for LoginAndRegisterParams usage rg "LoginAndRegisterParams"Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify removal of LoginAndRegisterParams and usage of Recordable # Search for any occurrences of LoginAndRegisterParams rg "LoginAndRegisterParams" # Search for usages of Recordable to ensure it's integrated properly rg "Recordable"Length of output: 4708
playground/src/store/auth.ts (3)
88-88
: LGTM: Comment spelling correction.The spelling correction in the Chinese comment improves clarity and correctness.
Line range hint
1-114
: Overall LGTM with minor suggestions for improvement.The changes in this file align well with the PR objectives of addressing spelling errors and adjusting types. The shift to
Recordable<any>
provides more flexibility but at the cost of some type safety. Consider using more specific types where possible to balance flexibility and type safety.As a final step, please ensure that these changes are consistent across the entire codebase and that all components interacting with the
authLogin
function are updated accordingly.Run the following script to verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of auth-related changes across the codebase echo "Checking for any remaining usages of LoginAndRegisterParams:" rg "LoginAndRegisterParams" echo "\nVerifying Recordable<any> usage for auth-related functions:" rg "params:\s*Recordable<any>" echo "\nChecking for any inconsistent usage of '登录' vs '登陆':" rg "登陆"
1-1
: LGTM, but consider type safety implications.The change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
aligns with the PR objective of type adjustment and provides more flexibility. However, be aware that this might reduce type safety, as it allows any key-value pairs.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
All references to
LoginAndRegisterParams
have been successfully removed, andRecordable<any>
is consistently used forparams
across all relevant auth store files. No type declarations or documentation references toLoginAndRegisterParams
were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of LoginAndRegisterParams # and verify the consistent use of Recordable<any> for login parameters. echo "Checking for remaining LoginAndRegisterParams usages:" rg "LoginAndRegisterParams" echo "\nVerifying Recordable<any> usage for login parameters:" rg "params:\s*Recordable<any>"Length of output: 729
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive verification of type changes in auth stores. echo "Verifying no remaining imports of LoginAndRegisterParams:" rg "import.*LoginAndRegisterParams" echo "\nEnsuring Recordable<any> is consistently used for params in auth stores:" rg "params:\s*Recordable<any>" playground/src/store/auth.ts apps/web-naive/src/store/auth.ts apps/web-antd/src/store/auth.ts apps/web-ele/src/store/auth.ts echo "\nChecking for any type declarations referencing LoginAndRegisterParams:" rg "LoginAndRegisterParams" $(fd -t f -e ts) echo "\nEnsuring no comments or documentation reference LoginAndRegisterParams:" rg "LoginAndRegisterParams" $(fd -t f -e md,ts)Length of output: 25488
apps/web-ele/src/store/auth.ts (2)
87-87
: Approved: Correction of Chinese term for "login"The change from "登陆" to "登录" in the comment is correct and aligns with the standardization of Chinese terms related to authentication.
To ensure consistency across the project, let's check for any remaining instances of "登陆":
#!/bin/bash # Search for remaining instances of "登陆" in the project rg "登陆" --type ts --type vuePlease review the results and consider updating any remaining instances for consistency.
28-28
:⚠️ Potential issueConsider using a more specific type instead of
Recordable<any>
The change from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable<any>
increases flexibility but at the cost of type safety. While this aligns with changes in other parts of the project, it may lead to potential runtime errors if the correct structure isn't maintained by the callers.Consider using a more specific type that still allows for flexibility. For example:
type LoginParams = Recordable<string | number | boolean>;This would provide some level of type checking while still allowing for a flexible structure.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce inconsistencies, let's check how
authLogin
is used across the project:Please review the results to ensure all calls to
authLogin
are updated accordingly.✅ Verification successful
Type change to
Recordable<any>
verified successfullyAll usages of
authLogin
have been updated to accommodate the newRecordable<any>
type without introducing type inconsistencies or errors.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of authLogin function rg "authLogin\(" -A 3Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of authLogin function in TypeScript and Vue files rg "authLogin\(" -A 3 -g "*.ts" -g "*.vue"Length of output: 2352
apps/web-naive/src/store/auth.ts (2)
1-1
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to include
Recordable
from '@vben/types', which aligns with the parameter type change in theauthLogin
function. Removing unused imports is a good practice for code cleanliness.
87-87
: LGTM: Comment updated for consistency.The Chinese terminology for "login page" has been corrected from "登陆页" to "登录页". This change improves consistency with other localization updates across the project and enhances the accuracy of the comment.
packages/effects/common-ui/src/ui/authentication/login.vue (5)
2-2
: LGTM: Consistent type import across authentication components.The import of
Recordable
from '@vben/types' aligns with the PR objective of making type adjustments. This change introduces more flexibility in type handling and is consistent with similar modifications in other authentication components.
47-47
: LGTM: Enhanced form value retrieval.The addition of
getValues
to the destructured return value ofuseVbenForm
is a good change. It provides more explicit control over form value retrieval and is consistent with the updates in thehandleSubmit
function.
66-67
: LGTM: Improved form submission process.The updates to the
handleSubmit
function enhance the clarity and consistency of the form submission process:
- Separating validation from value retrieval (lines 66-67) provides a more robust approach.
- Directly emitting
values
(line 73) is consistent with the updated emit type definition.These changes simplify the submission process and make it more straightforward.
Also applies to: 73-73
Line range hint
1-173
: Overall assessment: Positive improvements to login component.The changes in this file successfully address the PR objectives by:
- Enhancing type flexibility with the introduction of
Recordable<any>
.- Improving form handling and submission process.
- Maintaining consistency with other authentication components.
These modifications contribute to a more standardized and flexible authentication system across the project. The changes are well-implemented and align with best practices in Vue component development.
44-44
: LGTM: Flexible emit type definition.The updated emit type definition for the 'submit' event to
[Recordable<any>]
is consistent with theRecordable
import and allows for more flexible data structures. This change enhances the component's adaptability to various use cases.Please verify that the parent component correctly handles the potentially more flexible structure of the emitted data. Run the following script to check the usage of this component:
playground/src/views/demos/access/button-control.vue (4)
Line range hint
1-165
: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe changes in this file are part of a broader effort to adjust types in the project, replacing
LoginAndRegisterParams
with the more flexibleRecordable<any>
. While this change aligns with the PR objectives, it introduces some potential risks:
- Reduced type safety: The new
Recordable<any>
type is less specific, which could lead to type-related issues.- Potential runtime errors: Parts of the code that rely on specific properties of the account objects may now be prone to runtime errors.
- Code clarity: The use of a more generic type might make it less clear what structure is expected in the
accounts
object.Recommendations:
- Carefully review all usages of the
accounts
object to ensure compatibility with the new type.- Consider adding runtime checks or type guards where necessary to maintain the expected structure of account objects.
- Update any documentation or comments to reflect the new, more flexible type of the
accounts
object.- If possible, consider using a more specific type than
Recordable<any>
that still captures the structure of the account objects.To ensure these changes don't introduce unintended consequences, please run comprehensive tests, paying special attention to the login and account switching functionality.
14-14
: Verify the impact of using a more generic type foraccounts
.The type of
accounts
has been changed fromRecord<string, LoginAndRegisterParams>
toRecord<string, Recordable<any>>
. This change introduces more flexibility but also reduces type safety. Consider the following points:
- Type safety: The
Recordable<any>
type is very permissive and might allow properties that weren't intended in the originalLoginAndRegisterParams
type.- Code maintainability: With a less specific type, it may become harder to track what properties are expected in the account objects.
- Potential runtime errors: If any part of the code relies on specific properties of
LoginAndRegisterParams
, this change could lead to runtime errors.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check how the
accounts
object is used throughout the component:#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the accounts object ast-grep --pattern 'accounts.$_'Review the results to ensure that all usages of
accounts
are compatible with the newRecordable<any>
type.
Line range hint
37-46
: EnsurechangeAccount
function remains compatible with the newaccounts
type.While the
changeAccount
function hasn't been modified, it uses theaccounts
object which now has a less specific type. Consider the following:
- Type safety: The function assumes certain properties (like
password
andusername
) exist in the account object. With the newRecordable<any>
type, these properties are no longer guaranteed by the type system.- Potential runtime errors: If the structure of the account objects changes, it could lead to runtime errors in this function.
To ensure the
changeAccount
function remains compatible, please review its usage of theaccounts
object:#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of accounts object properties in changeAccount function ast-grep --pattern 'function changeAccount($_) { $$$ accounts[$_] $$$ }'Verify that all properties accessed from
accounts[role]
are still valid with the new type.
2-2
: Consider the implications of using a more generic type.The import has been changed from
LoginAndRegisterParams
toRecordable
. While this aligns with the PR objective of adjusting types, it's important to consider the following:
- Type safety:
Recordable
is likely more flexible but potentially less specific thanLoginAndRegisterParams
. This could lead to reduced type checking and potential runtime errors if not handled carefully.- Code clarity: The more generic type might make it less clear what structure is expected in the
accounts
object.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any usage of
LoginAndRegisterParams
in the codebase:If there are no results, it confirms that the type has been consistently updated across the project.
docs/src/guide/in-depth/access.md (2)
14-14
: Approved: Consistent terminology correctionThe change from "登陆" to "登录" is a correct typographical adjustment. This modification aligns with similar updates made across various localization files in the project, ensuring consistency in login-related terms.
Line range hint
1-391
: Suggestion: Conduct a comprehensive review of the entire documentWhile only one minor change was made to correct terminology, this document contains crucial information about access control mechanisms. Given the PR's focus on adjusting forms and types, it would be beneficial to:
- Verify that all code snippets and examples are up-to-date and align with the latest implementation.
- Ensure that the documentation accurately reflects any changes made to the access control system in this PR.
- Check for any other instances of "登陆" that might need to be updated to "登录" for consistency.
This comprehensive review will help maintain the accuracy and reliability of the documentation.
…actual development (vbenjs#4694)
Description
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yaml
unless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:dev
command.pnpm test
.feat:
,fix:
,perf:
,docs:
, orchore:
.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Recordable<any>
, enhancing input handling for login and registration processes.Documentation