refactor: adjust layout refresh button and watermark; allow static i18n on language switch #4579
Conversation
…8n on language switch
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/README.md (2)
7-7: Improved header customization with detailed slot ranges.The update to the
header-right-nsorting range and the addition of specific ranges for common header elements greatly enhances the customization capabilities. This change provides developers with a clear structure for organizing header components while maintaining flexibility.The expanded range (0-49) for custom slots and the detailed ranges for specific elements (e.g., global-search, theme-toggle) offer precise control over the header layout. The large range (91-149) for notifications suggests support for a potentially complex notification system.
Consider adding a brief explanation or example of how to use these ranges in the actual implementation. This could help developers quickly understand how to apply these changes in their code.
6-7: Documentation updates align with PR objectives.These changes to the README file effectively document the adjustments made to the layout, specifically regarding the header slot configurations. This update aligns well with the PR objective of refactoring and adjusting the layout.
The expanded and more detailed slot ranges provide developers with greater flexibility and control over the header layout, which could potentially accommodate the mentioned layout refresh button and watermark adjustments.
As this change significantly alters the header slot configuration, ensure that:
- The implementation code accurately reflects these new ranges.
- Any existing custom header implementations in the project are updated to use the new ranges.
- The project's documentation or style guide is updated to reflect these new conventions for header customization.
packages/effects/hooks/src/use-watermark.ts (1)
Line range hint
40-83: Consider enhancing the reactivity of the watermark hook.The current implementation of
useWatermarkis functional, but it might benefit from improved reactivity. Here are some suggestions:
- Consider using a reactive object for
cachedOptionsinstead of aref. This would allow for more granular updates to the watermark options.- Implement a way to reactively update the watermark when certain conditions change, replacing the removed
watchfunction.- Expose a method to allow manual refresh of the watermark, which could be useful in scenarios where automatic updates are not triggered.
Here's a potential refactor to improve reactivity:
import { reactive, watch, onUnmounted } from 'vue'; // ... (keep the existing imports and type definitions) export function useWatermark() { const cachedOptions = reactive<Partial<WatermarkOptions>>({ // ... (keep the existing default options) }); const watermarkInstance = ref<Watermark | null>(null); async function initWatermark(options: Partial<WatermarkOptions>) { const { Watermark } = await import('watermark-js-plus'); Object.assign(cachedOptions, options); watermarkInstance.value = new Watermark(cachedOptions); await watermarkInstance.value.create(); } async function updateWatermark(options: Partial<WatermarkOptions>) { Object.assign(cachedOptions, options); if (watermarkInstance.value) { await nextTick(); await watermarkInstance.value.changeOptions(cachedOptions); } else { await initWatermark(options); } } function destroyWatermark() { watermarkInstance.value?.destroy(); watermarkInstance.value = null; } // Watch for changes in cachedOptions and update the watermark watch(cachedOptions, async () => { if (watermarkInstance.value) { await updateWatermark(cachedOptions); } }, { deep: true }); onUnmounted(() => { destroyWatermark(); }); return { destroyWatermark, updateWatermark, refreshWatermark: () => updateWatermark(cachedOptions), watermark: readonly(watermarkInstance), }; }This refactor introduces reactive options, automatic updates when options change, and a new
refreshWatermarkmethod for manual updates.apps/web-naive/src/router/guard.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Overall assessment of the changes in guard.tsThe modification to unconditionally track loaded paths in the
setupCommonGuardfunction appears to be a deliberate simplification of the routing logic. This change aligns with the PR's objective of refactoring the layout.However, given that this change might affect the behavior of page transitions and animations, it's crucial to:
- Thoroughly test the application to ensure no regressions in navigation behavior.
- Update any documentation that might reference the previous conditional path tracking.
- Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind this change for future maintainers.
Consider documenting the decision to remove the conditional check on
preferences.tabbar.enablein a comment above theloadedPaths.add(to.path);line. This will help future developers understand the reasoning behind this architectural change.packages/@core/preferences/src/types.ts (2)
219-220: LGTM! Consider enhancing the comment for consistency.The addition of the
refreshproperty to theWidgetPreferencesinterface is a good enhancement, allowing for more granular control over the refresh button's visibility. This change aligns well with the PR objective of adjusting the layout refresh button.For consistency with other comments in the file, consider updating the comment to:
- /** 显示刷新按钮 */ + /** 是否显示刷新按钮 */ refresh: boolean;This change would make the comment style consistent with other boolean properties in the file.
Line range hint
1-1: Summary of changes and their impactThe main change in this file is the addition of the
refreshproperty to theWidgetPreferencesinterface, which aligns with the PR objective of adjusting the layout refresh button. This change, combined with the reported removal ofshowRefreshfromTabbarPreferences, suggests a reorganization of the refresh button functionality.These modifications appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to improve the organization of preferences in the application. The changes should provide more flexibility in managing the visibility of the refresh button.
To ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that all references to the old
TabbarPreferences.showRefreshhave been updated to useWidgetPreferences.refreshinstead.- Update any documentation or comments related to the refresh button functionality to reflect these changes.
- Ensure that the UI components and logic handling the refresh button have been updated to use the new preference location.
Consider adding a brief comment in the
TabbarPreferencesinterface to explain why the refresh functionality was moved, if it's not obvious from the context. This will help future developers understand the reasoning behind this architectural change.packages/locales/src/langs/zh-CN.json (1)
318-319: LGTM! New translations added for lock screen and refresh functionalities.The additions of "lockScreen" and "refresh" keys under the "widget" section are correct and consistent with the existing translations. These changes align with the PR objectives of adjusting the layout refresh button.
Consider updating the PR description to mention the addition of the lock screen feature, as it wasn't initially included in the PR objectives.
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/layout.vue (2)
144-146: LGTM. Consider optimizing the refresh approach.The addition of this watch function aligns with the PR objective of allowing static i18n on language switch. It's a common approach to refresh the page after a language update to ensure all components reflect the new language.
However, consider if a full page refresh is necessary. Depending on your i18n implementation, you might be able to update the language more efficiently by emitting an event or using a reactive store, which could provide a smoother user experience.
298-300: LGTM. Consider adding a transition for smoother UX.The addition of the
LayoutContentSpinnerwhenpreferences.transition.loadingis true is a good enhancement for user experience during layout transitions or refreshes. This is consistent with the overall theme of layout adjustments mentioned in the PR objectives.To further improve the user experience, consider adding a fade transition to the spinner's appearance and disappearance. This can make the loading state feel more smooth and less abrupt.
docs/src/guide/essentials/settings.md (3)
Line range hint
1-30: LGTM! Clear and informative addition to environment variable configuration.The new section on environment variable configuration provides valuable information for developers. It clearly explains the file naming conventions, loading rules, and the importance of the
VITE_prefix for client-side variables.Consider adding a brief example of how to access these variables in the code, such as:
console.log(import.meta.env.VITE_APP_TITLE);This would provide a complete picture of how to define and use environment variables in the project.
Line range hint
95-164: LGTM! Comprehensive explanation of dynamic configuration capabilities.The new section on production environment dynamic configuration is well-detailed and informative. It clearly explains the purpose of the
_app.config.jsfile, how to use it, and how to add new dynamic configuration variables.To enhance clarity, consider adding a brief explanation of why using a
.jsfile for configuration is preferred over other formats (e.g., JSON). This would help developers understand the rationale behind this approach.
284-286: LGTM! New preference option added for refresh functionality.The addition of the
refreshproperty to theWidgetPreferencesinterface enhances the customization options for the application. This change aligns with the PR objective of adjusting the layout refresh button.Consider adding a brief description of the
refreshproperty in the documentation, explaining its purpose and effect when enabled or disabled. This would help developers understand how to use this new preference option effectively.Also applies to: 495-496
packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/preferences-drawer.vue (2)
147-147: Overall changes look good, but consider adding documentationThe addition of the
widgetRefreshpreference is well-implemented and consistent with the existing code structure. It partially fulfills the PR objectives by addressing the layout refresh button.However, I have a few suggestions:
- Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and behavior of the
widgetRefreshpreference.- The PR objectives mention adjusting the watermark, but there are no visible changes related to this. If this is still planned, please update the PR description or add a TODO comment.
Would you like me to suggest a documentation comment for the
widgetRefreshmodel?Also applies to: 361-361
Watermark Integration Missing in Preferences Drawer
The watermark functionality appears to be implemented in other parts of the codebase. However, the
preferences-drawer.vuefile does not import or utilize theuse-watermark.tsmodule. To fully address the PR objectives, please ensure that the watermark adjustment is integrated within the preferences drawer component.
- Action Required: Import and implement
use-watermark.tsinpackages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/preferences-drawer.vueto enable watermark adjustments as intended.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-433: Summary: Changes look good, but PR objectives are partially addressedThe implementation of the
widgetRefreshpreference is well done and consistent with the existing code structure. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
The PR objectives mention adjusting both the layout refresh button and the watermark. While the refresh button preference has been added, there are no visible changes related to the watermark adjustment. Please clarify if this is still planned or if the PR description needs updating.
Consider adding brief documentation comments for the new
widgetRefreshpreference to explain its purpose and behavior.Overall, the changes improve the component's functionality by adding a new customizable widget preference. Great job on maintaining consistency with the existing code structure and following Vue 3 best practices!
To ensure all PR objectives are met, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if watermark-related changes are present in the codebase # Check for any watermark-related changes echo "Searching for watermark-related changes:" rg --type vue -i 'watermark' # Check for any additional files that might contain watermark logic echo "Searching for potential watermark-related files:" fd -e vue -e ts watermarkLength of output: 326
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected script to search for watermark-related changes in .vue files echo "Searching for watermark-related changes in .vue files:" rg -i 'watermark' --glob '*.vue' echo "Checking if 'use-watermark.ts' is imported in 'preferences-drawer.vue':" rg 'use-watermark' packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/preferences-drawer.vueLength of output: 3451
docs/src/en/guide/essentials/settings.md (2)
Line range hint
264-471: LGTM: Newrefreshproperty added to widget preferencesThe addition of the
refreshproperty to theWidgetPreferencesinterface is a good improvement. It allows for configuring the visibility of a refresh button, which can enhance user experience.Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a brief explanation of the refresh button's functionality in the documentation. This would help developers understand the purpose and use case of this new preference option.
Line range hint
1-471: Excellent documentation update with room for minor enhancementThis comprehensive update to the documentation significantly improves its value to developers. The additions provide clear explanations of environment configurations, dynamic settings, and the preferences system. The structure is logical and easy to follow, with appropriate code examples and type definitions.
Suggestion for future improvement:
Consider adding a changelog section at the beginning or end of the document to highlight recent changes or additions. This would help returning users quickly identify new features or important updates in the documentation.apps/web-ele/src/layouts/basic.vue (1)
108-122: Add error handling in the asynchronous watch callbackThe asynchronous operations within the
watchcallback may fail, and currently, there is no error handling in place.Consider wrapping the asynchronous code in a
try...catchblock to handle potential errors gracefully:async (enable) => { + try { if (enable) { const username = userStore.userInfo?.username ?? 'Guest'; await updateWatermark({ content: username, }); } else { destroyWatermark(); } + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to update watermark:', error); + } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/@core/preferences/__tests__/__snapshots__/config.test.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
- apps/web-antd/src/layouts/basic.vue (3 hunks)
- apps/web-antd/src/router/guard.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web-ele/src/layouts/basic.vue (3 hunks)
- apps/web-ele/src/router/guard.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web-naive/src/layouts/basic.vue (3 hunks)
- apps/web-naive/src/router/guard.ts (1 hunks)
- docs/src/en/guide/essentials/settings.md (2 hunks)
- docs/src/guide/essentials/settings.md (2 hunks)
- packages/@core/preferences/src/config.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/@core/preferences/src/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/@core/ui-kit/tabs-ui/src/components/widgets/index.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/@core/ui-kit/tabs-ui/src/components/widgets/tool-refresh.vue (0 hunks)
- packages/effects/hooks/src/use-watermark.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/README.md (1 hunks)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/header/header.vue (4 hunks)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/layout.vue (4 hunks)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/tabbar/tabbar.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/blocks/layout/tabbar.vue (0 hunks)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/blocks/layout/widget.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/preferences-drawer.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/locales/src/langs/en-US.json (1 hunks)
- packages/locales/src/langs/zh-CN.json (1 hunks)
- playground/src/layouts/basic.vue (3 hunks)
- playground/src/router/guard.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- packages/@core/ui-kit/tabs-ui/src/components/widgets/index.ts
- packages/@core/ui-kit/tabs-ui/src/components/widgets/tool-refresh.vue
- packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/blocks/layout/tabbar.vue
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (34)
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/README.md (1)
6-6: Expanded range for left header slots improves flexibility.The update to the
header-left-nsorting range (now 0-19) provides more options for custom slot placement. This change, along with specifying the breadcrumb's starting position at 21, offers clearer guidance and increased flexibility for developers when customizing the header layout.packages/effects/hooks/src/use-watermark.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-83: Summary of changes and suggestions
The removal of the
preferencesimport and associatedwatchfunction simplifies the code but may affect how the watermark is controlled globally. Ensure this change aligns with the intended behavior of the application.The core functionality of
useWatermarkremains intact, but there's an opportunity to enhance its reactivity and flexibility.Consider implementing the suggested refactor to improve reactivity, introduce automatic updates when options change, and add a manual refresh method.
Verify that all components and functions that previously relied on preference-based watermark control have been updated accordingly.
These changes and suggestions aim to maintain the functionality of the watermark feature while potentially improving its integration with the rest of the application.
3-3: Verify the impact of removing thepreferencesimport.The removal of the
preferencesimport suggests that the watermark functionality no longer depends on user preferences. This change aligns with the removal of thewatchfunction mentioned in the AI summary.Please ensure that:
- The watermark behavior is still correctly managed without relying on user preferences.
- Any components or functions that previously relied on preference-based watermark control have been updated accordingly.
To verify the impact, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Removal of
preferencesimport verified and safe.The
useWatermarkhook no longer relies on user preferences, and no other references topreferences.app.watermarkwere found in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to preferences related to watermarks # Search for any remaining references to preferences.app.watermark rg --type typescript "preferences\.app\.watermark" -g '!packages/effects/hooks/src/use-watermark.ts' # Search for any usage of the useWatermark hook that might expect preference-based behavior rg --type typescript "useWatermark" -A 10 -B 5Length of output: 219
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to preferences related to watermarks in TypeScript files # Search for any remaining references to preferences.app.watermark in .ts and .tsx files rg "preferences\.app\.watermark" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Search for any usage of the useWatermark hook that might expect preference-based behavior in .ts and .tsx files rg "useWatermark" -A 10 -B 5 -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 1203
packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/blocks/layout/widget.vue (2)
25-25: LGTM: New widget refresh model added correctly.The new
widgetRefreshmodel is correctly implemented usingdefineModel<boolean>('widgetRefresh'). It follows the established pattern for other widget preference models in this file and is appropriately typed as a boolean.
65-67: LGTM: Widget refresh preference added to the template.The new
SwitchItemfor the widget refresh preference is correctly implemented:
- It uses
v-model="widgetRefresh"to bind to the new model.- The label is properly internationalized using
$t('preferences.widget.refresh').- The placement at the end of the widget preferences list is appropriate.
packages/@core/preferences/src/config.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-115: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this file focus on reorganizing the refresh functionality by moving it from the
tabbarobject to thewidgetobject. This aligns with the PR objective of adjusting the layout refresh button.Key points:
- The
showRefreshproperty has been removed fromtabbar.- A new
refreshproperty has been added towidget.These changes may impact the application's layout and user interaction patterns. Ensure that corresponding UI components and logic are updated to reflect this new structure.
Note: The PR objectives also mentioned enabling static i18n on language switch, but there are no visible changes related to this in the current file. This might be implemented in other files not included in this review.
To ensure a smooth transition, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old structure and confirm the implementation of the new one:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the transition of refresh functionality # Test 1: Check for any remaining references to tabbar.showRefresh echo "Checking for tabbar.showRefresh references:" rg 'tabbar\.showRefresh' --type vue --type ts # Test 2: Check for implementations of the new widget.refresh echo "Checking for widget.refresh implementations:" rg 'widget\.refresh' --type vue --type tsReview the results to ensure that all necessary updates have been made throughout the codebase.
110-110: Approve the addition ofrefreshtowidgetThe addition of
refresh: trueto thewidgetobject is consistent with the PR objective of adjusting the layout refresh button. This change, in conjunction with the removal ofshowRefreshfromtabbar, suggests a reorganization of the refresh functionality.To ensure this change is properly implemented, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the implementation of the new widget.refresh property # Test: Search for widget.refresh usage in Vue and TypeScript files rg 'widget\.refresh' --type vue --type tsEnsure that the results show appropriate usage of this new property in the application's components or logic.
Line range hint
78-86: Confirm the removal ofshowRefreshfromtabbarThe
showRefreshproperty has been removed from thetabbarobject, which aligns with the PR objective of adjusting the layout refresh button. This change suggests that the refresh functionality is being handled differently, possibly moved to thewidgetobject.To ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, those occurrences should be updated to use the new refresh mechanism.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The removal of
showRefreshfrom thetabbarobject has been successfully implemented without any remaining references. Additionally, therefreshproperty has been correctly added to thewidgetobject and is properly utilized in relevant components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to tabbar.showRefresh # Test: Search for tabbar.showRefresh usage rg 'tabbar\.showRefresh' --type vue --type tsLength of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-check for any remaining references to tabbar.showRefresh and widget.refresh using file extensions # Check for tabbar.showRefresh usage in .vue and .ts files echo 'Checking for tabbar.showRefresh references:' rg 'tabbar\.showRefresh' --glob '*.vue' --glob '*.ts' # Check for widget.refresh implementations in .vue and .ts files echo 'Checking for widget.refresh implementations:' rg 'widget\.refresh' --glob '*.vue' --glob '*.ts'Length of output: 509
playground/src/router/guard.ts (2)
36-36: Simplified path tracking logic approved, but verify impact.The unconditional addition of the current path to
loadedPathssimplifies the code. However, this change might affect the behavior of subsequent navigation to the same route, potentially impacting the layout refresh functionality mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verification:
✅ Verification successful
Path tracking logic verified and approved.
The unconditional addition of the current path to
loadedPathsis localized toplayground/src/router/guard.tsand does not affect other parts of the codebase. No unintended side effects related to layout refresh, watermark, or i18n were detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other uses of loadedPaths that might be affected by this change # Search for other occurrences of loadedPaths rg 'loadedPaths' --type tsLength of output: 6647
Line range hint
1-124: Verify alignment with PR objectivesThe changes in this file, while valid, don't directly address the stated PR objectives of adjusting the layout refresh button and watermark, or allowing static i18n on language switch.
To ensure all objectives are met, please run the following verification:
If these changes are implemented in other files, consider updating the PR description to accurately reflect all modifications. If the objectives have changed, please update the PR description accordingly.
apps/web-naive/src/router/guard.ts (1)
37-37: Approve the unconditional path tracking, but verify its impact.The change to unconditionally add paths to
loadedPathssimplifies the code and ensures consistent tracking of loaded pages. This aligns with the refactoring objective of the PR.However, it's important to verify that this change doesn't negatively impact other parts of the application that might have relied on the previous conditional behavior.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verification:
This script will help identify any potential areas that might need adjustment due to the changed behavior of
loadedPaths.✅ Verification successful
Verified: The unconditional addition of paths to
loadedPathsdoes not impact other parts of the application. The change is approved.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any usage of loadedPaths that might be affected by this change # Search for usage of loadedPaths in the codebase echo "Searching for loadedPaths usage:" rg "loadedPaths" --type ts -C 5 # Search for any code that might rely on preferences.tabbar.enable in relation to route handling echo "Searching for preferences.tabbar.enable usage in routing context:" rg "preferences\.tabbar\.enable" --type ts -C 5 | rg -C 5 "route|path|navigation"Length of output: 5770
apps/web-antd/src/router/guard.ts (1)
37-37: Approve change, but clarify intention and impact.The simplification of always adding the current path to
loadedPathsimproves code clarity and ensures consistent behavior across all route transitions. This aligns with the PR's refactoring objective.However, please clarify:
- Was the removal of the
preferences.tabbar.enablecheck intentional?- Are there any other parts of the application that might rely on the previous conditional behavior?
To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Completed: No Additional Usages Found
No other instances of
preferences.tabbar.enablewere found in the codebase. The removal of the conditional check inguard.tsappears to be safe and does not affect other parts of the application.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of preferences.tabbar.enable # Test: Search for other occurrences of preferences.tabbar.enable rg "preferences\.tabbar\.enable" --type tsLength of output: 163
apps/web-ele/src/router/guard.ts (1)
37-37: Approve simplification, but verify intentional removal of conditional checkThe unconditional addition of paths to
loadedPathssimplifies the code and ensures consistent tracking of visited paths. This change aligns well with the refactoring objective of the PR.However, please confirm:
- Was the removal of the
preferences.tabbar.enablecondition intentional?- Does this change affect any existing functionality that might have relied on the conditional path tracking?
To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verification:
If the removal of the condition was intentional and doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, please update any related documentation to reflect this change in behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Change Verified: Conditional Removal is Isolated and Safe
The removal of the
preferences.tabbar.enablecondition inapps/web-ele/src/router/guard.tsis confined to this specific file. Other parts of the codebase still referencepreferences.tabbar.enableappropriately, ensuring no unintended side effects.
loadedPathsis scoped within eachguard.ts, preventing cross-file interference.- The change aligns with the refactoring objectives and simplifies the code without impacting functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to preferences.tabbar.enable in relation to loadedPaths # Search for any remaining references to preferences.tabbar.enable echo "Searching for remaining references to preferences.tabbar.enable:" rg "preferences\.tabbar\.enable" # Search for any usage of loadedPaths that might be affected by this change echo "Searching for usage of loadedPaths:" rg "loadedPaths"Length of output: 1680
packages/@core/preferences/src/types.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Verify the removal ofshowRefreshfromTabbarPreferences.The AI summary mentions the removal of the
showRefreshproperty from theTabbarPreferencesinterface. However, this change is not visible in the provided code snippet. This shift in refresh button management aligns with the PR objective but requires verification.Please run the following script to confirm the removal and check for any remaining references:
This script will help us confirm the removal and identify any areas that might need updating due to this change.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of
showRefreshfromTabbarPreferencesconfirmed. No remaining references found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of showRefresh from TabbarPreferences and check for any remaining references # Check if showRefresh was removed from TabbarPreferences echo "Checking for showRefresh in TabbarPreferences:" rg --type typescript 'showRefresh.*TabbarPreferences' packages/@core/preferences/src/types.ts # Check for any remaining references to showRefresh in the codebase echo "Checking for any remaining references to showRefresh:" rg --type typescript 'showRefresh' # Check for any usage of the old TabbarPreferences.showRefresh echo "Checking for usage of TabbarPreferences.showRefresh:" rg --type typescript 'TabbarPreferences.*showRefresh'Length of output: 626
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of showRefresh from TabbarPreferences and check for any remaining references # Check if showRefresh was removed from TabbarPreferences echo "Checking for showRefresh in TabbarPreferences:" rg 'showRefresh\s*:\s*' packages/@core/preferences/src/types.ts # Check for any remaining references to showRefresh in the codebase echo "Checking for any remaining references to showRefresh:" rg 'showRefresh' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' # Check for usage of TabbarPreferences.showRefresh echo "Checking for usage of TabbarPreferences.showRefresh:" rg 'TabbarPreferences\..*showRefresh' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 499
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/layout.vue (3)
6-6: LGTM. Please clarify the addition ofuseLockStore.The change from
useWatermarktouseRefreshaligns with the PR objective of adjusting the layout refresh functionality. However, the addition ofuseLockStorewasn't mentioned in the PR objectives. Could you please provide more context on why this was added and how it relates to the layout adjustments?Also applies to: 13-13
48-48: LGTM. Consistent with import changes.The addition of
refreshfromuseRefresh()is consistent with the import statement changes and aligns with the PR objective of adjusting the layout refresh functionality.
Line range hint
1-335: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The modifications in this file successfully implement the layout refresh adjustments and enable static i18n on language switch as described in the PR objectives. The code quality is good, and the changes are well-integrated into the existing structure.
A few minor suggestions have been made for potential improvements:
- Clarify the addition of
useLockStore.- Consider optimizing the language switch refresh approach.
- Add a transition effect to the loading spinner for smoother UX.
These suggestions are not critical and can be addressed at your discretion. Great job on the implementation!
packages/locales/src/langs/en-US.json (1)
318-319: New widget options added.The new entries for "lockScreen" and "refresh" under the "widget" section are consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. These additions align with the PR objectives of adjusting the layout refresh button.
packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/preferences-drawer.vue (2)
147-147: LGTM: Addition ofwidgetRefreshmodelThe addition of the
widgetRefreshmodel is consistent with the existing code structure and follows Vue 3 best practices. It's correctly typed as a boolean, which is appropriate for a toggle-like preference.
361-361: LGTM: Usage ofwidgetRefreshin Widget componentThe
widgetRefreshmodel is correctly bound to theWidgetcomponent usingv-model:widget-refresh="widgetRefresh". This usage is consistent with other widget preferences and follows Vue 3 best practices for two-way binding.docs/src/en/guide/essentials/settings.md (1)
Line range hint
1-264: LGTM: Comprehensive documentation updateThe changes to this documentation file are extensive and provide valuable information about environment variable configuration, dynamic configuration in production, and preferences. The additions enhance the clarity and usability of the project setup.
Key improvements include:
- Detailed explanation of environment variable files and their usage.
- Clear instructions on dynamic configuration in the production environment.
- Comprehensive overview of the preferences system, including default configurations and types.
These changes will greatly assist developers in understanding and configuring the project.
apps/web-antd/src/layouts/basic.vue (4)
4-4: Correctly importing 'watch' from 'vue'The addition of
watchto the import statement is appropriate and necessary for the newly added watch function.
8-8: Importing 'useWatermark' hookImporting
useWatermarkfrom@vben/hooksis correctly implemented to handle the watermark functionality.
58-58: Destructuring functions from 'useWatermark'Extracting
destroyWatermarkandupdateWatermarkvia destructuring is correctly implemented and prepares the functions for use.
108-122:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure 'username' is defined before updating watermark
While the optional chaining
userStore.userInfo?.usernamehandles undefineduserInfo, ifusernameisundefined, the watermark content may be empty or display as'undefined'. Consider providing a default value or checking ifusernameexists before updating the watermark to enhance user experience.Apply this diff to provide a default value:
await updateWatermark({ - content: `${userStore.userInfo?.username}`, + content: `${userStore.userInfo?.username || 'Guest'}`, });Run the following script to verify if
userStore.userInfo.usernameis always defined before the watch executes:apps/web-naive/src/layouts/basic.vue (2)
4-4: Import 'watch' correctly addedThe
watchfunction is now imported from'vue'to support reactive behavior.
8-8: Import 'useWatermark' hookThe
useWatermarkhook is imported from'@vben/hooks'to enable the watermark functionality.playground/src/layouts/basic.vue (3)
4-4: LGTMThe import of
watchfrom'vue'is necessary for the reactive watch functionality added below.
8-8: LGTMImporting
useWatermarkfrom'@vben/hooks'correctly sets up the watermark feature.
58-58: Correctly Destructure Watermark FunctionsDestructuring
destroyWatermarkandupdateWatermarkfromuseWatermark()is appropriate and sets up the necessary functions for managing the watermark.apps/web-ele/src/layouts/basic.vue (4)
4-4: Importing 'watch' from 'vue'The
watchfunction is correctly imported and used in the component.
8-8: Importing 'useWatermark' from '@vben/hooks'The import of
useWatermarkis appropriate for managing the watermark functionality.
58-58: Destructuring 'destroyWatermark' and 'updateWatermark'The destructuring assignment from
useWatermarkto extractdestroyWatermarkandupdateWatermarkis correct.
108-122: Ensure 'preferences.app.watermark' is reactiveVerify that
preferences.app.watermarkis a reactive property so that thewatchfunction can detect changes appropriately. If it's not reactive, the watcher won't trigger when the watermark preference changes.
packages/effects/layouts/src/widgets/preferences/blocks/layout/widget.vue
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/header/header.vue (1)
42-42: Approve changes torightSlots, suggest modification toleftSlotsThe changes to
rightSlotsusingREFERENCE_VALUEare consistent and correct. ForleftSlots, while the addition of the 'refresh' item is correct, consider adjusting its index for consistency:if (preferences.widget.refresh) { list.push({ - index: 0, + index: REFERENCE_VALUE - 10, name: 'refresh', }); }This change would maintain a consistent indexing strategy across both
leftSlotsandrightSlots.Also applies to: 45-45, 52-52, 58-58, 64-64, 70-70, 76-76, 91-98
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/header/header.vue (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/header/header.vue (4)
4-5: LGTM: New imports for refresh functionalityThe new imports (
useRefresh,RotateCw,VbenIconButton) are correctly added and align with the introduction of the refresh feature.Also applies to: 8-8
34-35: LGTM: ConstantREFERENCE_VALUEcorrectly definedThe constant
REFERENCE_VALUEis correctly defined with a value of 50. This addresses the previous typographical error mentioned in past review comments where it was incorrectly namedREFERENCE_VALUTE.
39-39: LGTM: Correct usage ofuseRefreshhookThe
refreshfunction is correctly destructured from theuseRefreshhook, preparing it for use in the new refresh functionality.
116-125: LGTM: Template changes for refresh functionalityThe template changes are well-implemented:
- The filter for
leftSlotscorrectly usesREFERENCE_VALUE, maintaining consistency with the script changes.- The new 'refresh' template is correctly implemented, using the
VbenIconButtonandRotateCwicon, and is properly connected to therefreshfunction.These changes effectively integrate the new refresh functionality into the component's UI.
Also applies to: 131-131
Description
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
pnpm-lock.yamlunless you introduce a new test example.Checklist
pnpm run docs:devcommand.pnpm test.feat:,fix:,perf:,docs:, orchore:.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores