Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

/usr/bin/ar: permission denied when running haste-boot #353

Closed
simonjrp opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 10 comments
Closed

/usr/bin/ar: permission denied when running haste-boot #353

simonjrp opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

@simonjrp
Copy link

simonjrp commented Dec 7, 2015

I can't run haste-boot after a fresh installation on El Capitan (via cabal). I immediately get "/usr/bin/ar: permission denied", even when running as root. This might be related to the "System Integrity Protection" that Apple introduced in OS X El Capitan.

Edit: Seems to work if one disables SIP before running haste-boot (boot into safe mode and run "csrutil disable"), and then re-enables it again afterwords.

@valderman
Copy link
Owner

That's interesting, and slightly weird: Haste should never be calling ar. Does your .cabal/config contain shared: True or any other interesting flags? This seems like it may be related to, or at least the same kind of problem as, #348.

@bananu7
Copy link

bananu7 commented Dec 19, 2015

It's called by haste-boot which calls haste-cabal which tries to call ar. I can, sadly, reproduce. No shared: True.

And I'm pretty sure it's related to this main cabal issue.

I have unix 2.7.1.0 installed system-wide, but I suppose haste-cabal is downloaded as a binary and thus might have older version in it. I'll see if I can build just that from source with new unix.

EDIT: I hit environment problems while building cabal. Will retry soon and see if getting new unix in fixes it. I am pretty sure it will.

@atamon
Copy link

atamon commented Mar 3, 2016

@bananu7 I've run into the same issue it seems. I tried building cabal from source as stated in the README, and it includes unix 2.7.1.0 when run. But I still get the same error as above.

Did you get this working, if so, how? :)

Cheers

@bananu7
Copy link

bananu7 commented Mar 3, 2016

It was a while ago; I think that fixing unix got it to work though.

@atamon
Copy link

atamon commented Mar 3, 2016

Alright, thanks for the lead! :)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:45 PM Bartek Banachewicz [email protected]
wrote:

It was a while ago; I think that fixing unix got it to work though.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#353 (comment)
.

@valderman
Copy link
Owner

Until this is fixed (and even after that - this build is finicky), it's highly recommended that you use the pre-built binaries for non-Linux platforms. Not only does this have a substantially higher likelihood of working, but you also get niceties such as manual pages and not having to wait forever for haste-boot to complete.

@saurabhnanda
Copy link

I have downloaded the pre-build Haste binary and am trying to compile https://github.com/yamafaktory/reflex-starter with it.

  • haste-cabal init worked
  • haste-cabal install is throwing a /usr/bin/ar: permission denied

@vilhelms
Copy link

vilhelms commented Oct 2, 2016

Unfortunately, I don't think using the pre-build binary is a solution, because the haste-cabal that comes with it still doesn't seem to work:

$ haste-cabal install parsec
haste-cabal: /usr/bin/ar: permission denied

@valderman
Copy link
Owner

Fixed as of release 0.5.5.1.

@saurabhnanda
Copy link

So, time to try reflex-frp with haste now?

On 16 Oct 2016 4:06 am, "Anton Ekblad" [email protected] wrote:

Fixed as of release 0.5.5.1.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#353 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABu0W63w0Shuwtdnoo816D15x-nTh3oks5q0VV4gaJpZM4Gv6g-
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants