Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Update bfs to 4.0 #446

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2024
Merged

ci: Update bfs to 4.0 #446

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2024

Conversation

tavianator
Copy link
Contributor

And fix diff-bfs.sh for the new test result format.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.47%. Comparing base (d9d2a4e) to head (bcaea4f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #446   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.47%   66.47%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        4278     4278           
  Branches      958      958           
=======================================
  Hits         2844     2844           
  Misses       1041     1041           
  Partials      393      393           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

Commit 0492e01 has GNU testsuite comparison:

Run GNU findutils tests: GNU tests summary = TOTAL: 659 / PASS: 477 / FAIL: 179 / ERROR: 2
Run GNU findutils tests: Changes from main: PASS +0 / FAIL +0 / ERROR +0 / SKIP +0 
Run GNU findutils tests: Gnu tests No changes
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test  57 / 288 is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed:  70 / 317.  70 / 317 is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/HLP. common/HLP is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus. common/gid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus_plus. common/gid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus. common/gid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus_plus. common/gid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test common/name_slashes is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus. common/uid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus_plus. common/uid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus. common/uid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus_plus. common/uid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Changes from main: PASS +11 / SKIP +5 / FAIL +13
Run BFS tests: BFS tests summary = TOTAL: 317 / PASS: 241 / SKIP: 6 / FAIL: 70

And fix diff-bfs.sh for the new test result format.
Copy link

Commit bcaea4f has GNU testsuite comparison:

Run GNU findutils tests: GNU tests summary = TOTAL: 659 / PASS: 477 / FAIL: 179 / ERROR: 2
Run GNU findutils tests: Changes from main: PASS +0 / FAIL +0 / ERROR +0 / SKIP +0 
Run GNU findutils tests: Gnu tests No changes
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/HLP. common/HLP is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus. common/gid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus_plus. common/gid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus. common/gid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus_plus. common/gid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test common/name_slashes is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus. common/uid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus_plus. common/uid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus. common/uid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus_plus. common/uid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: gnu/ignore_readdir_race_loop. gnu/ignore_readdir_race_loop is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Changes from main: PASS +11 / SKIP +5 / FAIL +13
Run BFS tests: BFS tests summary = TOTAL: 317 / PASS: 241 / SKIP: 6 / FAIL: 70

@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit abf851d into uutils:main Aug 17, 2024
19 checks passed
@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants