Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

VOTE-3121: Enable Navajo translations on production. #1162

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

VOTE-3121: Enable Navajo translations on production. #1162

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

daniel-crowder
Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-crowder daniel-crowder commented Dec 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Jira ticket

VOTE-3121

Description

Re-enable Navajo translations on production.

Deployment and testing

Post-deploy steps

  1. n/a

QA/Testing instructions

  1. Confirm that Navajo translations are enabled on production once deployed.

Checklist for the Developer

  • A link to the JIRA ticket has been included above.
  • No merge conflicts exist with the target branch.
  • Automated tests have passed on this PR.
  • A reviewer has been designated.
  • Deployment and testing steps have been documented above, if applicable.

Checklist for the Peer Reviewers

  • The file changes are relevant to the task objective.
  • Code is readable and includes appropriate commenting.
  • Code standards and best practices are followed.
  • QA/Test steps were successfully completed, if applicable.
  • Applicable logs are free of errors.

@clmedders clmedders merged commit 32ac5b6 into dev Dec 11, 2024
2 checks passed
@clmedders clmedders deleted the feature/vote-3121-enable-navajo-translation branch December 11, 2024 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@clmedders clmedders clmedders approved these changes

Assignees

@clmedders clmedders

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@daniel-crowder @clmedders