Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VOTE-3120: Disable Navajo translation. #1146

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

daniel-crowder
Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-crowder daniel-crowder commented Dec 2, 2024

Jira ticket

VOTE-3120

Description

Disable Navajo translation on production.

Deployment and testing

Post-deploy steps

  1. Locally change line 189 in sites/settings.local.php to include $config['config_split.config_split.production']['status'] = TRUE;
  2. Run drush cim

QA/Testing instructions

  1. Review the site as a user and confirm that Navajo is not available in the language switcher located in the top right hand corner of the site.
  2. Login as an administrator and goto /admin/config/regional/language and confirm that Navajo is marked as disabled.

Checklist for the Developer

  • A link to the JIRA ticket has been included above.
  • No merge conflicts exist with the target branch.
  • Automated tests have passed on this PR.
  • A reviewer has been designated.
  • Deployment and testing steps have been documented above, if applicable.

Checklist for the Peer Reviewers

  • The file changes are relevant to the task objective.
  • Code is readable and includes appropriate commenting.
  • Code standards and best practices are followed.
  • QA/Test steps were successfully completed, if applicable.
  • Applicable logs are free of errors.

@clmedders clmedders merged commit 38959e5 into dev Dec 2, 2024
2 checks passed
@clmedders clmedders deleted the feature/VOTE-3120-disable-navajo branch December 2, 2024 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants