-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 455
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(next): warn for missing suspense boundary #3449
Merged
JoviDeCroock
merged 1 commit into
urql-graphql:main
from
JoviDeCroock:next-suspense-warning
Dec 6, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
'@urql/next': patch | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Show a warning when the `Suspense` boundary is missing under the UrqlProvider |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, my only concern here is that there could be legitimate uses for this. I'm imagining that some router systems may use suspense in unexpected ways, so not sure if we can somehow make detection work without a custom boundary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That feels counter-intuitive as for the Provider to work you would need a boundary either way so even-if something higher up is a Suspense boundary that would render the urql provider pointless
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this Suspense is inserted on the server side, the Promise resolution in the React component will change to streaming instead of waiting.
I'm sorry, but SSR in urql without Suspense will be impossible.
https://next-blog.croud.jp/contents/7m4dShGLIpFkc0GKHIrW
Can you please adjust the server side so that Suspense is not interrupted?