Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed Build a Block editor article #6795

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Removed Build a Block editor article #6795

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

eshanrnh
Copy link
Contributor

@eshanrnh eshanrnh commented Jan 14, 2025

Description

  • Removed Build a Block Editor article for ALL versions.

  • Ensured any links to the article are removed/updated.

  • Add redirect to the Block Editor section in Fundamentals for ALL versions.

Type of suggestion

  • Typo/grammar fix
  • Updated outdated content
  • New content
  • Updates related to a new version
  • Other

Product & version (if relevant)

v10, v13, v14, v15

Deadline (if relevant)

Anytime

Copy link
Contributor

@sofietoft sofietoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good @eshanrnh ! 💪

But, should we also delete the actual article from the file structure?

@eshanrnh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, we definitely should. I somehow missed deleting the articles earlier 🙈 It should be gone now 💪

Copy link
Contributor

@sofietoft sofietoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😄
Figured it was an oversight!

The changes LGTM 💪

@eshanrnh eshanrnh merged commit 8fda0e6 into main Jan 15, 2025
11 checks passed
@eshanrnh eshanrnh deleted the build-block-editor branch January 15, 2025 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants