Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Objects365 images GB vs zips GB #7335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2022
Merged

Conversation

glenn-jocher
Copy link
Member

@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher commented Apr 7, 2022

@kalenmike

πŸ› οΈ PR Summary

Made with ❀️ by Ultralytics Actions

🌟 Summary

Enhancements to Objects365 dataset configuration in YOLOv5.

πŸ“Š Key Changes

  • Updated the Objects365.yaml file, potentially refining the dataset paths or structure.
  • The specifics of the change are not clear from the provided diff excerpt, as the actual lines altered are not shown.

🎯 Purpose & Impact

  • 🎨 Improves data handling for the Objects365 dataset within the YOLOv5 framework by possibly fixing issues or optimizing the dataset referencing method.
  • πŸ‘©β€πŸ’» Allows users of YOLOv5 to train models more effectively using Objects365, either through more efficient access to data or more accurate dataset division into train/val/test sets.
  • πŸš€ May lead to better performance and convenience for researchers and developers working on object detection tasks using this dataset.

@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher changed the title Objects365 dataset breakdown images vs zips Objects365 GB images vs zips Apr 7, 2022
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher changed the title Objects365 GB images vs zips Objects365 images GB vs zips GB Apr 7, 2022
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher merged commit 5783de2 into master Apr 7, 2022
@glenn-jocher glenn-jocher deleted the glenn-jocher-patch-2 branch April 7, 2022 14:12
BjarneKuehl pushed a commit to fhkiel-mlaip/yolov5 that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant