You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am not entirely sure. Sorry. I haven't used it in a while. Coronaviruses don't have plasmids.
You'd have to experiment. Maybe remove all the lines of mapping to the plasmid from the vcf (or even the sam file) manually before continuing to make the alignment.
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 16:29, ulfschaefer ***@***.***> wrote:
Phil!
I am not entirely sure. Sorry. I haven't used it in a while. Coronaviruses
don't have plasmids.
You'd have to experiment. Maybe remove all the lines of mapping to the
plasmid from the vcf (or even the sam file) manually before continuing to
make the alignment.
Ulf
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAT6FEVTVARNPHMDLTB5VLDSIXPWLANCNFSM4SBX7IRA>
.
Hello,
I'm using PHEnix for an organism where the reference genome has plasmids.
I want to leave the plasmids in for the mapping and snp calling so that plasmid reads don't map to the chromosome, potentially causing artefacts.
But then, the plasmids should be removed before the phylogeny is constructed.
What is the behaviour of vcf2fasta? Will it output a consensus fasta of the chromosome plus the plasmid?
Thanks!
Phil
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: